The opposing groups are limbering up for the battle. The proposal is to build a high speed railway between London and Birmingham where the line will bifurcate, one limb going to Manchester, the other to Leeds.
Proponents of the scheme point to the slashed journey times between major cities, the increasing demand for rail travel and the problem of some existing routes being close to saturation.
See:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/8668412/HS2-the-fast-track-fix-for-bridging-the-North-South-divide.html
Opponents point to the environmental damage the new line will cause, dispute the need for speed over capacity and argue that the funding would be better spent on improving existing routes and re-opening closed lines. See also:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/8672802/Full-scale-of-opposition-to-34-billion-High-Speed-2-rail-link-revealed.html
Building new railways is a very slow process from initial planning to completion and it is vital that plans to deal with the capacity problems on the routes from London to Birmingham and Manchester are put in motion now. The question though is: is the proposed solution the correct one?
The West Coast Main Line (WCML) is a very busy route serving, inter alia, London, Coventry, Birmingham, Wolverhampton, Stoke-on-Trent, Stockport, Manchester, Chester, Liverpool, Preston, Blackpool and Glasgow. The problem is that some stations along the line have a poor service in order to maximise capacity for trains between major cities. Places such as Milton Keynes, Northampton, Rugby, Nuneaton, Tamworth, Litchfield and Stafford suffer.
There is an alternative route to Birmingham from London Marylebone via High Wycombe, Bicester and Leamington Spa. This route has had significant upgrades in recent years and operates a half-hourly service between London and Birmingham. It is slower, but cheaper, by this route. It is difficult to see how capacity can be raised much more without a detrimental effect on the suburban traffic from London to High Wycombe and Aylesbury.
There are those who claim the answer is not to build a new high speed line but to enhance the capacity of the WCML. It is difficult to see how this could be achieved. It would be more expensive than building a new line and there would be untold disruption on the route for the third time in sixty years.
Is there anything else that can be done? One suggestion is to re-open the Bedford-Northampton line to enable Thameslink trains to reach the latter town and thence to Birmingham or along the Trent valley to Stafford.
One of the major problems in the Manchester-London traffic. At one time it was possible to reach four London termini from Manchester. The only remaining route is that to Euston via Stafford. Until the 1970s it was possible to travel via Derby to St Pancras, via Sheffield, Nottingham and Leicester to Maryleone and via Sheffield and Grantham to King's Cross. I believe consideration should be given to re-opening at least one alternative route between Manchester and London.
See: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/jul/29/boris-johnson-high-speed-rail
TYKE IN KENT'S THEOLOGICAL RAMBLINGS
Saturday, 30 July 2011
Friday, 29 July 2011
Where do I live?
I live in the Borough of Tunbridge Wells. More specifically I lived until May of this year in Royal Tunbridge Wells which is the unparished part of the borough. Now Rusthall has a parish council. Does this mean that I no longer live in Royal Tunbridge Wells?
Wild Rusthall
A Rusthall resident has been handed a nine year sentence for robbing a post office van in a suburb of Tunbridge Wells
Another resident has been handed a ten month prison sentence suspended for two years for an unprovoked attack in a Rusthall street on a young woman.
Think I'll order some body armour.
Another resident has been handed a ten month prison sentence suspended for two years for an unprovoked attack in a Rusthall street on a young woman.
Think I'll order some body armour.
Rail Competition
Yesterday I watched a programme about the vital part the railways played in the Second World War. By the end of the war the railway infrastructure was much weakened and the railways were nationalised by the Labour government. The position was such that any government after the war would have had to nationalise to ensure investment in repairing the system. In those days there were no motorways and most goods and minerals were conveyed by rail.
The programme mentioned the role the railway played in the preparations leading up to D-Day and the fact that there were so many alternative routes that could be used.
Acting on the recommendations contained in the Beeching Report Conservative and Labour governments in the 1960s closed many competing railways and reduced capacity on lines that were retained. Margaret Thatcher decided to privatise the railways -the poll tax on wheels - as Nicholas Ridley MP described it. What privatisation lacked was the introduction of competition, franchises deliver monopolies.
The history of the development of railways in the nineteenth century is one of competition and the avoidance of monopoly. Some of the competition resulted in ruination for the railway companies involved. Some cities were served by by two or more competing companies, some by only one company.
The classic example of ruinous competition is that of the London Chatham & Dover Railway and the South Eastern Railway. Where one company went, the other was sure to follow. Eventually common sense prevailed and the two companies in effect merged to become the London and South Eastern Railway and operate an integrated service.
At one time it was possible to travel by train from Manchester to London Euston via Stafford and Rugby, to London St Pancras via Derby, to London Marylebone via Sheffield, Nottingham and Rugby and to London King's Cross via Sheffield. Today the only route is that to London Euston. The line is almost full to capacity and the franchise holder has a monopoly. Such is progress.
The programme mentioned the role the railway played in the preparations leading up to D-Day and the fact that there were so many alternative routes that could be used.
Acting on the recommendations contained in the Beeching Report Conservative and Labour governments in the 1960s closed many competing railways and reduced capacity on lines that were retained. Margaret Thatcher decided to privatise the railways -the poll tax on wheels - as Nicholas Ridley MP described it. What privatisation lacked was the introduction of competition, franchises deliver monopolies.
The history of the development of railways in the nineteenth century is one of competition and the avoidance of monopoly. Some of the competition resulted in ruination for the railway companies involved. Some cities were served by by two or more competing companies, some by only one company.
The classic example of ruinous competition is that of the London Chatham & Dover Railway and the South Eastern Railway. Where one company went, the other was sure to follow. Eventually common sense prevailed and the two companies in effect merged to become the London and South Eastern Railway and operate an integrated service.
At one time it was possible to travel by train from Manchester to London Euston via Stafford and Rugby, to London St Pancras via Derby, to London Marylebone via Sheffield, Nottingham and Rugby and to London King's Cross via Sheffield. Today the only route is that to London Euston. The line is almost full to capacity and the franchise holder has a monopoly. Such is progress.
An interest in railways
My home in my early years overlooked two railway lines, the former Great Central and London and North Eastern Railway line between London Marylebone and Sheffield and the Midland and London Midland and Scottish Railway between London St Pancras and Leeds. From our house I could see Tapton Junction where the former Midland line to Sheffield and Rotherham diverted from the 'old road' direct to Rotherham. George Stephenson had lived at Tapton House.
My father was interested in earlier transport links, turnpikes and canals, and was awarded a Ph.D. by Sheffield University for a thesis on turnpikes and canals in and around Sheffield and North Derbyshire. He encouraged me to take an interest in railways from an historical perspective and also the current railway scene.
My knowledge of the geography of the United Kingdom was gained through looking at railway timetables and maps. I developed an understanding of goods and mineral traffic flows and how they served industry. Watching trains go by was of secondary interest and I never bothered to collect numbers. However I was interested in why, where I lived, the former LMS line was always busy whilst trains were few and far between on the former LNER line. Why were two competing lines built between Sheffield, Nottingham, Leicester and London?
Often I played with friends by the side of the Chesterfield Canal close to the lines of the two railway companies which had been nationalised in 1947 and named 'British Railways'. We would see the 'Devonian' heading for Birmingham, Bristol and Torquay, the 'Waverley Express' for Leeds, Carlisle and Edinburgh and the 'Thames-Clyde Express' also for Carlisle and thence to Glasgow. In those days, before the advent of motorways, these far away places existed in our imagination. What were they like? No Internet or Google maps to refer to.
The south and the 'electric' trains of the Southern Region were a foreign land to us and all we knew about them was encapsulated in the London to Brighton in Four Minutes film.
We lived in a more innocent age, didn't watch much television, no computer games to play, no fear of strangers. The pace of life was slower and we didn't have washing machines, cars, supermarkets and all the other boons to modern day living. On the hand there was washing day drudgery, frequent visits to the shops, poor housing and many people worked in dangerous industries.
In my lifetime scientific knowledge and new technology has wrought hugely beneficial changes to our society, but I am thankful for the experiences of my childhood.
My father was interested in earlier transport links, turnpikes and canals, and was awarded a Ph.D. by Sheffield University for a thesis on turnpikes and canals in and around Sheffield and North Derbyshire. He encouraged me to take an interest in railways from an historical perspective and also the current railway scene.
My knowledge of the geography of the United Kingdom was gained through looking at railway timetables and maps. I developed an understanding of goods and mineral traffic flows and how they served industry. Watching trains go by was of secondary interest and I never bothered to collect numbers. However I was interested in why, where I lived, the former LMS line was always busy whilst trains were few and far between on the former LNER line. Why were two competing lines built between Sheffield, Nottingham, Leicester and London?
Often I played with friends by the side of the Chesterfield Canal close to the lines of the two railway companies which had been nationalised in 1947 and named 'British Railways'. We would see the 'Devonian' heading for Birmingham, Bristol and Torquay, the 'Waverley Express' for Leeds, Carlisle and Edinburgh and the 'Thames-Clyde Express' also for Carlisle and thence to Glasgow. In those days, before the advent of motorways, these far away places existed in our imagination. What were they like? No Internet or Google maps to refer to.
The south and the 'electric' trains of the Southern Region were a foreign land to us and all we knew about them was encapsulated in the London to Brighton in Four Minutes film.
We lived in a more innocent age, didn't watch much television, no computer games to play, no fear of strangers. The pace of life was slower and we didn't have washing machines, cars, supermarkets and all the other boons to modern day living. On the hand there was washing day drudgery, frequent visits to the shops, poor housing and many people worked in dangerous industries.
In my lifetime scientific knowledge and new technology has wrought hugely beneficial changes to our society, but I am thankful for the experiences of my childhood.
Thursday, 28 July 2011
Royal Tunbridge Wells and nostalgia
As the regeneration saga in Royal Tunbridge Wells bumbles along one key group in the discussion has been the Aspic Brigade, hell bent on preserving the town in a time-warp. The focus of attention has been the civic complex, which, as I have noted before, did not receive acclaim from Pevsener
An article in today's Daily Telegraph is critical of the decision to list a number of London Underground stations.
One paragraph from the article:
Nostalgia, of the kind to which the English are so prone, can be a debilitating condition. Is there any nation which spends so much time looking over its shoulder and so little time looking forward? The Underground may be a part of our cultural heritage, but it is also, and far more urgently, a problem crying out for a solution.
I enjoyed the following comment I received:
An article in today's Daily Telegraph is critical of the decision to list a number of London Underground stations.
One paragraph from the article:
Nostalgia, of the kind to which the English are so prone, can be a debilitating condition. Is there any nation which spends so much time looking over its shoulder and so little time looking forward? The Underground may be a part of our cultural heritage, but it is also, and far more urgently, a problem crying out for a solution.
I enjoyed the following comment I received:
It's fine to be nostalgic. Take out some of the red tiles and build a partial copy somewhere as part of a museum of the Underground. Take a bunch of nice photographs of each of these architectural works, preserve some tiles, make some nice ...displays. Perhaps the displays can even go on tour. And then build modern, efficient Underground stations, because the purpose of the Underground is the utilitarian purpose of TRANSPORTATION.
The civic complex in Royal Tunbridge Wells includes a museum/art gallery which is too small, a library on need of modernisation and an inadequate theatre.
As my correspondent notes, a building should fulfill its utilitarian purpose. Canterbury City Council has bitten the bullet and has demolished and rebuilt the Marlow Theatre. Kent County Council is providing funding for a new museum and library in the city. In Ashford a new library has been built.
Time to stop looking over our shoulder in Tunbridge Wells and look forward.
Surfing along: political parties
One of the joys of the Internet is the freedom it gives to study the views of political parties/ pressure groups and their members.
It is fascinating to a political anorak such as myself to explore the machinations of the minor parties of right and left. Both left and right spend more time attacking organisations on their wing than attacking the opposing wing, or challenging the major parties. In this regard nothing has changed over the years. What has changed is the weaponry used to mount attacks. Websites, fora and blogs have replaced the pamphlet.
The small parties of left and right engage in bitter internecine arguments of little interest to the vast majority of the population. A flavour of the disputation may be found by following this link:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/142531385797995
It is fascinating to a political anorak such as myself to explore the machinations of the minor parties of right and left. Both left and right spend more time attacking organisations on their wing than attacking the opposing wing, or challenging the major parties. In this regard nothing has changed over the years. What has changed is the weaponry used to mount attacks. Websites, fora and blogs have replaced the pamphlet.
The small parties of left and right engage in bitter internecine arguments of little interest to the vast majority of the population. A flavour of the disputation may be found by following this link:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/142531385797995
Wednesday, 27 July 2011
A wedding in Rugby
Many years ago I was invited to a wedding at Rugby Registry Office. Nothing very special about that, but the day was enlivened by the arrival of a friend of mine and his wife. The wife was carrying a cine-camera (that shows how long ago it was) and she said she hoped the marriage we were about to witness would last longer than the previous one. The groom's previous marriage, also at Rugby Registry Office, had broken down before the camera toting lady had had the film developed.
Following the ceremony the wedding party set off for the matrimonial home. The immediate problem we faced was getting past the geese into the bungalow. Geese are not only noisy and aggressive, but very messy. Once inside it was not a good idea to leave the safe haven and inspect the garden.
The journey home was trouble free. The car radio was on and a reporter was commenting on the outbreak of a small fire under the stand at Bradford City Football Club. Soon, the whole stand was aflame and many died. A sombre end to the day.
Below is a link to the television report on the fire.
http://www.footballclips.net/forum/general-video-clips/3760-bradford-city-football-club-fire-may-11-1985-warning-clip-may-offend.html
Following the ceremony the wedding party set off for the matrimonial home. The immediate problem we faced was getting past the geese into the bungalow. Geese are not only noisy and aggressive, but very messy. Once inside it was not a good idea to leave the safe haven and inspect the garden.
The journey home was trouble free. The car radio was on and a reporter was commenting on the outbreak of a small fire under the stand at Bradford City Football Club. Soon, the whole stand was aflame and many died. A sombre end to the day.
Below is a link to the television report on the fire.
http://www.footballclips.net/forum/general-video-clips/3760-bradford-city-football-club-fire-may-11-1985-warning-clip-may-offend.html
Having a Google
Having a few moments to spare I opened Google Maps and had a wander down Chatsworth Road, Chesterfield. Much was familiar, but in the twenty-five years since I moved from the town a number of landmarks have disappeared.
The Terminus Hotel, so named as it was at the end of the tram line from Whittington Moor, has been demolished and replaced by retirement flats. Not called Terminus Court I note.
The Terminus was a pub caught in a 1930s time warp. Then it all changed and went 'posh'. Some of the pub's characters adapted to the change very easily, they were oblivious to the up-market image the proprietors were keen to develop. One of the regulars was Harry Hall who had spent his life as a showman and ran Harry Hall's Amusements in Matlock Bath. A larger-than-life figure Harry would regale us with stories. Harry liked a Turkish bath and decided he would visit a local massage parlour. Unfortunately Harry did not understand that such places were not for a good massage, but had a rather different purpose. Harry was caustic in his criticism of the massage he had received.
Further down Chatsworth Road was Bradbury Hall owned by Robinson & Sons, a major company in the area. The hall was used as the works' canteen and once a year was given over to the company based operatic society. The performances were fun, but not of a high standard. One year the highlight for me was the appearance on stage of an individual who announced in a very broad Derbyshire accent that he was Captain Lopez of the Mexican police force. Our small party applauded vigorously and by the end of the performance Captain Lopez was the undisputed star of the show.
The hall was taken over of Mike Watterson and turned into an up-market snooker hall. Mike had been the promoter of the World Snooker Championship at The Crucible Theatre in Sheffield.
Further down Chatsworth Road was Brampton Brewery, then closed, now demolished. I never had the pleasure of drinking Brampton Mild, but older boozers' eyes would glaze over in fond remembrance of the drink.
One establishment still open is The Star. The former landlady, who had a passing resemblance to Hilda Baker, was a gem. The highlight of the year was the visit of Charlie Drake who stayed at the pub. The regulars would treat him as any other customer and would be rewarded with moments of comedy. I was never impressed by Charlie as a performer on television, but in the flesh he was very funny.
.
The Terminus Hotel, so named as it was at the end of the tram line from Whittington Moor, has been demolished and replaced by retirement flats. Not called Terminus Court I note.
The Terminus was a pub caught in a 1930s time warp. Then it all changed and went 'posh'. Some of the pub's characters adapted to the change very easily, they were oblivious to the up-market image the proprietors were keen to develop. One of the regulars was Harry Hall who had spent his life as a showman and ran Harry Hall's Amusements in Matlock Bath. A larger-than-life figure Harry would regale us with stories. Harry liked a Turkish bath and decided he would visit a local massage parlour. Unfortunately Harry did not understand that such places were not for a good massage, but had a rather different purpose. Harry was caustic in his criticism of the massage he had received.
Further down Chatsworth Road was Bradbury Hall owned by Robinson & Sons, a major company in the area. The hall was used as the works' canteen and once a year was given over to the company based operatic society. The performances were fun, but not of a high standard. One year the highlight for me was the appearance on stage of an individual who announced in a very broad Derbyshire accent that he was Captain Lopez of the Mexican police force. Our small party applauded vigorously and by the end of the performance Captain Lopez was the undisputed star of the show.
The hall was taken over of Mike Watterson and turned into an up-market snooker hall. Mike had been the promoter of the World Snooker Championship at The Crucible Theatre in Sheffield.
Further down Chatsworth Road was Brampton Brewery, then closed, now demolished. I never had the pleasure of drinking Brampton Mild, but older boozers' eyes would glaze over in fond remembrance of the drink.
One establishment still open is The Star. The former landlady, who had a passing resemblance to Hilda Baker, was a gem. The highlight of the year was the visit of Charlie Drake who stayed at the pub. The regulars would treat him as any other customer and would be rewarded with moments of comedy. I was never impressed by Charlie as a performer on television, but in the flesh he was very funny.
.
Contrary to speculation.....
I do not spend all day on my blogs and social networking sites.
Yesterday was a case in point: board meeting of a charity in the morning, visit to a community centre to give advice at lunchtime and a political meeting in the evening. Quite like old times. In amongst this working on developing Communities Food Community Interest Company.
Yesterday was a case in point: board meeting of a charity in the morning, visit to a community centre to give advice at lunchtime and a political meeting in the evening. Quite like old times. In amongst this working on developing Communities Food Community Interest Company.
Tuesday, 26 July 2011
Atos Assessments...boo!!
The Work and Pensions Committee report published today makes for bleak reading.
The report in full is available at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/work-and-pensions-committee/publications/
I declare an interest. For a time I was the Campaign Co-ordinator for ACT NOW. ACT NOW is concerned about the inappropriateness of the Atos assessment procedures as applied to people with autism. (It should be added that ACT NOW campaigns on other issues affecting children and adults with autism and their parents and carers.)
The campaign has been difficult. The last Labour government introduced the assessments and so, in opposition, the Labour Party was not well-placed to criticise the Coalition for continuing with the policies it inherited.
However, there has been support from backbenchers in the Labour Party. Jon Cruddas MP has been a strong supporter and indeed became the patron of ACT NOW.
The committee's report is but the start of the campaign to effect change in the procedures for assessing a person's ability to work. I note the Department of Work and Pensions published its own report today in a feeble attempt to take the sting out of the committee's report.
The BBC article (see link below) covers both the committee and the DWP reports.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14280849
As a bit of light relief I have posted a photograph of Anna Kennedy and Carole Rutherford, two of the core founder members of ACT NOW with John Cruddas earlier this year. I managed to sneak in as did Terry Rutherford, a staunch ACT NOW supporter.
The report in full is available at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/work-and-pensions-committee/publications/
I declare an interest. For a time I was the Campaign Co-ordinator for ACT NOW. ACT NOW is concerned about the inappropriateness of the Atos assessment procedures as applied to people with autism. (It should be added that ACT NOW campaigns on other issues affecting children and adults with autism and their parents and carers.)
The campaign has been difficult. The last Labour government introduced the assessments and so, in opposition, the Labour Party was not well-placed to criticise the Coalition for continuing with the policies it inherited.
However, there has been support from backbenchers in the Labour Party. Jon Cruddas MP has been a strong supporter and indeed became the patron of ACT NOW.
The committee's report is but the start of the campaign to effect change in the procedures for assessing a person's ability to work. I note the Department of Work and Pensions published its own report today in a feeble attempt to take the sting out of the committee's report.
The BBC article (see link below) covers both the committee and the DWP reports.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14280849
As a bit of light relief I have posted a photograph of Anna Kennedy and Carole Rutherford, two of the core founder members of ACT NOW with John Cruddas earlier this year. I managed to sneak in as did Terry Rutherford, a staunch ACT NOW supporter.
Peterborough leading the way?
Interesting article in today's Guardian (see link below) on the issue of civic engagement and participation. It is not simply about providing capital or revenue resources, it is about empowering people to shape public services and have a say in their delivery
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/jul/26/peterborough-power-to-people
Above all, it is not just about producing strategies. It is about delivering strategies.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/jul/26/peterborough-power-to-people
Above all, it is not just about producing strategies. It is about delivering strategies.
Sunday, 24 July 2011
Europe: where next for the United Kingdom?
We have a two tier European Union: countries which are part of the eurozone and them that are not. Despite warnings at the time the eurozone was formed that it would end in disaster unless there was fiscal as well as monetary union, as well as adherence to the criteria for joining the euro, countries rushed lemming like to join.
Last Thursday eurozone leaders, together with the European Central Bank and the EU Commission, cobbled together a short-term palliative which might hold off the looming disaster until the autumn. But a heavy price has been paid. Greece has defaulted despite all the fine words to the contrary, moves towards a transfer union and eventually a eurozone treasury have begun. EU constitutional rules have been ignored.
The stakes are particularly high for Germany. The risk for that nation is that it will finish up paying more to support failing countries for decades, which will make the reparations paid after the Great War look like loose change. Will the German people stand for it? Shall we see a resurgence of German nationalism, something which the Common Market was meant to deflate?
We should be grateful that John Major and Gordon Brown kept us out of the euro. Does the United Kingdom really want to be at the heart of Europe as a member of eurozone mark 2? I think not, although Mr Clegg and the Liberal Democrats seem to want us in.
A dreadful economic and social cost has beset Ireland, Greece, Portugal, Spain and Italy. The ability of the governments of sovereign nations to set economic, monetary and fiscal policy is at the heart of the democratic process. All the aforementioned countries have lost sovereignty to the EU fist. Would we wish to go down that road, to be controlled by an organisation beyond our ability to have any meaningful democratic control over it? I doubt it.
Since I wrote this I have noted the pertinent article in the Daily Telegraph. See link below:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/8658331/Angela-Merkel-faces-revolt-in-Germany-over-rescue-deal.html
Also this article:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,776411,00.html
Last Thursday eurozone leaders, together with the European Central Bank and the EU Commission, cobbled together a short-term palliative which might hold off the looming disaster until the autumn. But a heavy price has been paid. Greece has defaulted despite all the fine words to the contrary, moves towards a transfer union and eventually a eurozone treasury have begun. EU constitutional rules have been ignored.
The stakes are particularly high for Germany. The risk for that nation is that it will finish up paying more to support failing countries for decades, which will make the reparations paid after the Great War look like loose change. Will the German people stand for it? Shall we see a resurgence of German nationalism, something which the Common Market was meant to deflate?
We should be grateful that John Major and Gordon Brown kept us out of the euro. Does the United Kingdom really want to be at the heart of Europe as a member of eurozone mark 2? I think not, although Mr Clegg and the Liberal Democrats seem to want us in.
A dreadful economic and social cost has beset Ireland, Greece, Portugal, Spain and Italy. The ability of the governments of sovereign nations to set economic, monetary and fiscal policy is at the heart of the democratic process. All the aforementioned countries have lost sovereignty to the EU fist. Would we wish to go down that road, to be controlled by an organisation beyond our ability to have any meaningful democratic control over it? I doubt it.
Since I wrote this I have noted the pertinent article in the Daily Telegraph. See link below:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/8658331/Angela-Merkel-faces-revolt-in-Germany-over-rescue-deal.html
Also this article:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,776411,00.html
Friday, 22 July 2011
Getting our priorities right.
Until today two issues dominated the news: the News International telephone hacking and the travails of the Eurozone. In order of importance the hacking story has been given greater prominence and disgusting as it is the damage it has done is minimal when set against what could have happened had a short-term palliative not been found to the debt contagion issue.
However both issues have been overtaken by the obscene events in Oslo today. It has been quiet of late, but the threat of a terrorist attack in Europe is ever-present. In London in particular the risk will increase as the Olympic Games come ever closer.
Has our ability to counter terrorist attacks been damaged by the blood-letting at the top of the Metropolitan Police and the distraction to come of the inquiries the government has set up?
However both issues have been overtaken by the obscene events in Oslo today. It has been quiet of late, but the threat of a terrorist attack in Europe is ever-present. In London in particular the risk will increase as the Olympic Games come ever closer.
Has our ability to counter terrorist attacks been damaged by the blood-letting at the top of the Metropolitan Police and the distraction to come of the inquiries the government has set up?
Regeneration: Tunbridge Wells style.
I commented recently (link) on the massive regeneration being undertaken in Canterbury - a new Marlowe Theatre, a new library and a new museum, mostly funded by the city council with some support from Kent County Council. Forward looking, visionary, brave: call it what you will, but at least it shows a sense of purpose, direction and determination to provide modern facilities to enhance the cultural, educational, social and economic life of Canterbury.
And then there is Royal Tunbridge Wells which is part of the Borough of Tunbridge Wells. The contrast between the two councils is lamentable. This was emphasised at the Tunbridge Wells Borough Council (TWBC) meeting earlier this week to consider a report on a public consultation undertaken for the Tunbridge Wells Regeneration Company of which the Council is a partner. The Cranbrook nafia (sic) was out in force. It is clear that tensions within the Conservative Group continue despite the best efforts of the Leader, Councillor Bob Atwood to calm proceedings.
Unfortunately the pronouncements of Councillor Atwood do little to diminish concern that the cabinet is frozen by indecision, caught like a rabbit in the headlights, fearful of upsetting the Aspic Brigade.
As Councillor Tracey Moore stated: no more delays. Action this day: direction and determination to push on with regeneration is needed urgently.
And then there is Royal Tunbridge Wells which is part of the Borough of Tunbridge Wells. The contrast between the two councils is lamentable. This was emphasised at the Tunbridge Wells Borough Council (TWBC) meeting earlier this week to consider a report on a public consultation undertaken for the Tunbridge Wells Regeneration Company of which the Council is a partner. The Cranbrook nafia (sic) was out in force. It is clear that tensions within the Conservative Group continue despite the best efforts of the Leader, Councillor Bob Atwood to calm proceedings.
Unfortunately the pronouncements of Councillor Atwood do little to diminish concern that the cabinet is frozen by indecision, caught like a rabbit in the headlights, fearful of upsetting the Aspic Brigade.
As Councillor Tracey Moore stated: no more delays. Action this day: direction and determination to push on with regeneration is needed urgently.
YUK awards come round again
Yes reader, it is the time of year when the Directory of Social Change launches publicity for its annual awards:
http://www.socialchangeawards.org.uk/?dm_i=6S7,GY87,N8PCP,1DSRQ,1
http://www.socialchangeawards.org.uk/?dm_i=6S7,GY87,N8PCP,1DSRQ,1
Thursday, 21 July 2011
Germany calling, Germany calling
Twice in the twentieth century Germany called. Defeated after the Great War it took Germany only twenty years to mount a repeat fixture. Never again was the cry after the Great War. The Treaty of Versailles was a failure and after the Second World War a new strategy was needed to contain Germany. The plan that emerged was for countries in western Europe to work together and the hope was that the mistrust of Germany and that country's predilection to wage war as an extension of diplomacy would be overcome by the benefits of closer collaboration and the suppression of nationalism. Hence the formation of the European Economic Community (Common Market) and later the European Union.
The partition of Europe after the Second World War helped allay concerns about Germany. Half the nation was behind the Iron Curtain and part of the Soviet bloc.
After the false dawns of the Hungarian Uprising and the Prague Spring, eventually the USSR empire crumbled, as do all empires.. Fear of the power of a reunited Germany accelerated the demand for closer integration and hence the drive towards monetary union, but not fiscal union. Now it is recognised that there cannot be a workable monetary union without fiscal union.
Despite the drag on its economy of the former East Germany, the unified Germany has become the economic powerhouse of Europe. Like it or not, Germany is calling the shots in resolving the current problems facing the eurozone. Germany has come calling again.
The Brussels empire is as dismissive of the demands of the population under its fist as was the USSR of the people of its pliant states in eastern Europe. There will be a day of reckoning.
NB: The link below is to an article in the Guardian published on 22 July. Well worth a read.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jul/21/monetary-union-european-eurozone-sceptics
As is this:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/peteroborne/100098260/this-crisis-will-give-germany-the-empire-its-always-dreamed-of/
The partition of Europe after the Second World War helped allay concerns about Germany. Half the nation was behind the Iron Curtain and part of the Soviet bloc.
After the false dawns of the Hungarian Uprising and the Prague Spring, eventually the USSR empire crumbled, as do all empires.. Fear of the power of a reunited Germany accelerated the demand for closer integration and hence the drive towards monetary union, but not fiscal union. Now it is recognised that there cannot be a workable monetary union without fiscal union.
Despite the drag on its economy of the former East Germany, the unified Germany has become the economic powerhouse of Europe. Like it or not, Germany is calling the shots in resolving the current problems facing the eurozone. Germany has come calling again.
The Brussels empire is as dismissive of the demands of the population under its fist as was the USSR of the people of its pliant states in eastern Europe. There will be a day of reckoning.
NB: The link below is to an article in the Guardian published on 22 July. Well worth a read.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jul/21/monetary-union-european-eurozone-sceptics
As is this:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/peteroborne/100098260/this-crisis-will-give-germany-the-empire-its-always-dreamed-of/
Wednesday, 20 July 2011
Washing away the guilt.
The Labour Party, under the less than inspiring leadership of Ed Miliband, has formulated a policy to deal with its grievous failures in government. Simple: after the general election all the party did is in the past. What matters is the now. The election defeat has cleansed the party of all guilt, of its economic mismanagement and the sordid relationship it had with News International. It won't wash and when the inquiry looks into the relationship between Labour and News Corporation, the evangelical fervour with which little Ed is tearing into Cameron will be shown up as the rankest hypocrisy.
Monday, 18 July 2011
Crisis upon Crisis: More like FIFA every day
Quite apart from the crisis in the eurozone and the borrowing limit paralysis in the USA, we have our own fair share of crises to contend with.
Metropolitan Police in disarray, Crown Prosecution Service in disarray, a major media company in meltdown and concerns at the actions of the Prime Minister. What next?
Add to that the MPs and peers expenses scandal and the money for honours issue.
This country is becoming more like FIFA as each day goes by. Indeed FIFA is a paragon of honesty and transparency when set against what is happening in the UK.
Metropolitan Police in disarray, Crown Prosecution Service in disarray, a major media company in meltdown and concerns at the actions of the Prime Minister. What next?
Add to that the MPs and peers expenses scandal and the money for honours issue.
This country is becoming more like FIFA as each day goes by. Indeed FIFA is a paragon of honesty and transparency when set against what is happening in the UK.
Rip-off merchants
Please look at the item below
http://conservativehome.blogs.com/parliament/2011/07/tory-mps-debate-4500-interest-rates-charged-by-legal-lenders.html
It is a disgrace that it is legal to charge over 4,000% interest on loans.
It is with some pride that I say that I played a small part in the formation of Essex Savers Credit Union and also Kent Savers Credit Union. Credit unions are regulated and deposits with them are protected. Interest rates on loans are fair.
Go to the Association of British Credit Unions website for more information (link below)
http://www.abcul.org/home
http://conservativehome.blogs.com/parliament/2011/07/tory-mps-debate-4500-interest-rates-charged-by-legal-lenders.html
It is a disgrace that it is legal to charge over 4,000% interest on loans.
It is with some pride that I say that I played a small part in the formation of Essex Savers Credit Union and also Kent Savers Credit Union. Credit unions are regulated and deposits with them are protected. Interest rates on loans are fair.
Go to the Association of British Credit Unions website for more information (link below)
http://www.abcul.org/home
What a shambles
The wheels are coming off! What a shambles the hacking scandal has become. Pity the gentlemen in my photograph below are not around to bring a modicum of common sense and sanity to the proceedings,
Sunday, 17 July 2011
The stench is overpowering
The British people are being taken for mugs by the political elite.
Last year we had the sordid spectacle of MPs and peers gorging in the trough of public money to fund their lifestyles.
We had to endure the distasteful episode during which manifesto promises were broken as the politicians grubbed around to gain power.
The latest revelations concerning hacking show the depths and lengths to which politicians would go to curry favour with the Murdoch empire. Let there be no doubt, Labour sucked up to Murdoch in spades, so the self-righteous pontification by Ed Miliband leaves a very bad taste in the mouth.
Recently Miliband stated that Rebekah Brooks should resign as the wrongdoing had happened on her watch. I agree, but when was the last time a government minister or local authority leader resigned for something that happened on their watch? What we are told by the person overseeing a failure is that they are best placed to retrieve the position. Pass the sick bag please. More a case of politicians wishing to preserve their power and perks than take responsibility.
And politicians wonder why people are reluctant to vote!
Last year we had the sordid spectacle of MPs and peers gorging in the trough of public money to fund their lifestyles.
We had to endure the distasteful episode during which manifesto promises were broken as the politicians grubbed around to gain power.
The latest revelations concerning hacking show the depths and lengths to which politicians would go to curry favour with the Murdoch empire. Let there be no doubt, Labour sucked up to Murdoch in spades, so the self-righteous pontification by Ed Miliband leaves a very bad taste in the mouth.
Recently Miliband stated that Rebekah Brooks should resign as the wrongdoing had happened on her watch. I agree, but when was the last time a government minister or local authority leader resigned for something that happened on their watch? What we are told by the person overseeing a failure is that they are best placed to retrieve the position. Pass the sick bag please. More a case of politicians wishing to preserve their power and perks than take responsibility.
And politicians wonder why people are reluctant to vote!
Friday, 15 July 2011
Parish Jottings
Rusthall Parish Council has decided to embark on the production of a community led parish plan. Excellent news. According to a report in the local newspaper the council may use the services of Action with Communities in Rural Kent (ACRK). I declare an interest. ACRK is supporting Communities Food Community Interest Company and one of my fellow directors is employed by ARCK to work on community led parish plans.
It is reported in the press that Tunbridge Wells Borough Council has made a grant of £10,000 to the parish council. Again, excellent news, but is it a grant and therefore not repayable?
The newspaper carried a short story that the parish council gave its consent to a proposal to put a phone mast....'. Unless the law has changed the parish council cannot give consent to or refuse a planning proposal. It is invited to comment.
It is reported in the press that Tunbridge Wells Borough Council has made a grant of £10,000 to the parish council. Again, excellent news, but is it a grant and therefore not repayable?
The newspaper carried a short story that the parish council gave its consent to a proposal to put a phone mast....'. Unless the law has changed the parish council cannot give consent to or refuse a planning proposal. It is invited to comment.
Anodyne Civic Complex motion.
I quote from the Tunbridge Wells Borough Council's website:
On Wednesday 20 July at 6.30pm, there will be a Full Council meeting in Tunbridge Wells Town Hall which will consider, among other agenda items, the report from M&N Communications which gives feedback about the public consultation on the future of the civic complex in Royal Tunbridge Wells town centre.
The council will consider the following motion:
"That this Council notes the content of the M&N Consultation report, and thanks the many people who have contributed to it through questionnaires, workshops, drop-in sessions and focus groups. Furthermore, this Council undertakes to take account of the wide ranging and diverse views expressed in this Report together with the views expressed directly by members of the public, by Councillors, and in other relevant reports and documents, before taking any further decisions concerning the future of the Civic Complex."
The future of the civic complex is always a matter of great interest and therefore arrangements have been made for a live webcast of the meeting to be broadcast on the council’s website. The webcast will also be available to be viewed again on the website after the meeting."
Doubtless there will be the usual grandstanding questions from the aspic bridge and posturing from the more excitable councillors.
What I cannot fathom is why the motion is before the council as all it states is it will note and take account of opinions expressed before taking any further decisions concerning the future of the civic complex. Time for a big yawn. Reads more like a PR exercise than anything else. Methinks we should import a few councillors from Canterbury to put some dynamism into the Tunbridge Wells crawlers.
On Wednesday 20 July at 6.30pm, there will be a Full Council meeting in Tunbridge Wells Town Hall which will consider, among other agenda items, the report from M&N Communications which gives feedback about the public consultation on the future of the civic complex in Royal Tunbridge Wells town centre.
The council will consider the following motion:
"That this Council notes the content of the M&N Consultation report, and thanks the many people who have contributed to it through questionnaires, workshops, drop-in sessions and focus groups. Furthermore, this Council undertakes to take account of the wide ranging and diverse views expressed in this Report together with the views expressed directly by members of the public, by Councillors, and in other relevant reports and documents, before taking any further decisions concerning the future of the Civic Complex."
The future of the civic complex is always a matter of great interest and therefore arrangements have been made for a live webcast of the meeting to be broadcast on the council’s website. The webcast will also be available to be viewed again on the website after the meeting."
Doubtless there will be the usual grandstanding questions from the aspic bridge and posturing from the more excitable councillors.
What I cannot fathom is why the motion is before the council as all it states is it will note and take account of opinions expressed before taking any further decisions concerning the future of the civic complex. Time for a big yawn. Reads more like a PR exercise than anything else. Methinks we should import a few councillors from Canterbury to put some dynamism into the Tunbridge Wells crawlers.
News: priorities
The past fortnight has witnessed a media frenzy attacking News International over the telephone hacking issue and the police for alleged incompetence in investigating the hacking. Obviously these are important issues, but the danger is that restrictions on the media's freedom to investigate may be the eventual outcome of the inquiries set up to consider the issues. In the UK we have a secretive system of government. Curtailing the investigative tools at the disposal of the media will be welcomed by the establishment.
One of the unedifying spectacles during recent days has been the attacks made by two-bit politicians on News International and the police. Now, don't misunderstand me, there is much to criticise. However, the sight and sound of politicians 'bravely' speaking out leads me to ask why they were not so forthright before. The answer is simple: the two major parties sucked up to Murdoch. The police are being hammered in revenge for the investigation into the Honours scandal. As a letter writer to the Daily Telegraph put it:
Given Keith Vaz’s past disgrace, it would be nice if the lead in the questioning of police was taken by someone of greater credibility. Such as Coco the Clown.
There has been very little media coverage of the deterioration of the stability of the eurozone and the financial crisis developing in the United States, issues which could have a profound effect on the United Kingdom. The mere fact that there is even talk of returning to the Gold Standard should be sending out alarm signals.
Am I alone in thinking that the Westminster village and the media have got their priorities wrong?
One of the unedifying spectacles during recent days has been the attacks made by two-bit politicians on News International and the police. Now, don't misunderstand me, there is much to criticise. However, the sight and sound of politicians 'bravely' speaking out leads me to ask why they were not so forthright before. The answer is simple: the two major parties sucked up to Murdoch. The police are being hammered in revenge for the investigation into the Honours scandal. As a letter writer to the Daily Telegraph put it:
Given Keith Vaz’s past disgrace, it would be nice if the lead in the questioning of police was taken by someone of greater credibility. Such as Coco the Clown.
There has been very little media coverage of the deterioration of the stability of the eurozone and the financial crisis developing in the United States, issues which could have a profound effect on the United Kingdom. The mere fact that there is even talk of returning to the Gold Standard should be sending out alarm signals.
Am I alone in thinking that the Westminster village and the media have got their priorities wrong?
Thursday, 14 July 2011
European Union and English Nationalism
My avid reader knows I am in favour of withdrawal from the European Union and that I long to see a resolution of the West Lothian Question.
Both issues have risen up the political agenda; Europe because of the problems in the eurozone and the likelihood that the EU will use the current travails to press for greater integration and also proposals for the EU to have tax raising powers. Resolution of the West Lothian Question becomes more pressing following the stunning victory of the Scottish Nationalists in the recent elections for the Scottish parliament.
Recent opinion polls suggest that a majority of voters for each of three largest political parties is in favour of withdrawal from the EU. The parties though remain europhile. None of the parties has addressed the West Lothian Question in any meaningful way, although some progress is being made. See:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/democracylive/hi/house_of_lords/newsid_9535000/9535684.stm
In England two political parties have a clear policy of withdrawal from the EU - the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) and the English Democrats (ED).
The parties differ on how to deal with the West Lothian Question. UKIP's policy is for Westminster MPs from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to be barred from voting on purely English legislation.
The ED policy is for a separate English legislature and English government which I consider to be preferable to the UKIP proposal.
What needs to be determined is should the governments of the four nations be part of a federal structure and if so, what would be the responsibilities of the federal and national governments?
Fascinating as constitutional issues are, it has to be recognised that the electorate votes in UK elections on a wide range of issues, although a US President was probably right when he said: 'It's the economy stupid' which determines how people vote.
UKIP do well at European Parliament elections, but have not had any success at Westminster elections and little success in local government elections. The problem UKIP and the ED have is that what unites the membership are the constitutional issues. Both parties have policies on a wider range of issues, but these are seldom debated. To be successful both parties need to develop a supporter base which goes beyond constitutional issues.
Both issues have risen up the political agenda; Europe because of the problems in the eurozone and the likelihood that the EU will use the current travails to press for greater integration and also proposals for the EU to have tax raising powers. Resolution of the West Lothian Question becomes more pressing following the stunning victory of the Scottish Nationalists in the recent elections for the Scottish parliament.
Recent opinion polls suggest that a majority of voters for each of three largest political parties is in favour of withdrawal from the EU. The parties though remain europhile. None of the parties has addressed the West Lothian Question in any meaningful way, although some progress is being made. See:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/democracylive/hi/house_of_lords/newsid_9535000/9535684.stm
In England two political parties have a clear policy of withdrawal from the EU - the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) and the English Democrats (ED).
The parties differ on how to deal with the West Lothian Question. UKIP's policy is for Westminster MPs from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to be barred from voting on purely English legislation.
The ED policy is for a separate English legislature and English government which I consider to be preferable to the UKIP proposal.
What needs to be determined is should the governments of the four nations be part of a federal structure and if so, what would be the responsibilities of the federal and national governments?
Fascinating as constitutional issues are, it has to be recognised that the electorate votes in UK elections on a wide range of issues, although a US President was probably right when he said: 'It's the economy stupid' which determines how people vote.
UKIP do well at European Parliament elections, but have not had any success at Westminster elections and little success in local government elections. The problem UKIP and the ED have is that what unites the membership are the constitutional issues. Both parties have policies on a wider range of issues, but these are seldom debated. To be successful both parties need to develop a supporter base which goes beyond constitutional issues.
Tunbridge Wells: a tourist destination
Royal Tunbridge Wells is in commuter land. In the morning and evening rush hours some trains run non-stop between High Brooms (a suburb of the town) and London. Off-peak there are four trains an hour to London. However, the town has retained a distinctiveness which sets it apart from other commuter land towns such as Guildford and Reading.
There are many attractions for tourists in the Borough of Tunbridge Wells as well as in Royal Tunbridge Wells. The 'jewel in the crown' is the area known as the Pantiles and it is a major tourist attraction. For many years the tourist information centre was located in the Pantiles. However, the council decided, as a money saving measure, to re-locate the centre during the week to the Gateway. The Gateway is a mile from the Pantiles.
The council was warned that the move would be a disaster and it has been. Now the council is considering a recommendation to return the centre to full time operation in the Pantiles and abandon the presence in the Gateway.
Beggars belief that the council was so out of touch with reality.
There are many attractions for tourists in the Borough of Tunbridge Wells as well as in Royal Tunbridge Wells. The 'jewel in the crown' is the area known as the Pantiles and it is a major tourist attraction. For many years the tourist information centre was located in the Pantiles. However, the council decided, as a money saving measure, to re-locate the centre during the week to the Gateway. The Gateway is a mile from the Pantiles.
The council was warned that the move would be a disaster and it has been. Now the council is considering a recommendation to return the centre to full time operation in the Pantiles and abandon the presence in the Gateway.
Beggars belief that the council was so out of touch with reality.
Wednesday, 13 July 2011
Royal Victoria Place goes down market
Yes, I have blogged on this topic before, but a recent visit to RVP has left me even more depressed. When RVP opened the spacious circulating area and open spaces were a delight. But what has happened? Decking has been added at first floor level, cafes squeezed into the circulating area and a plethora of mobile stands added. More Lakeside than Bluewater.
The owners are sweating the assets and as a consequence the shopping experience has deteriorated. The recently opened extension to the shopping centre at County Square, Ashford is reminiscent of what RVP used to be like.
The owners are sweating the assets and as a consequence the shopping experience has deteriorated. The recently opened extension to the shopping centre at County Square, Ashford is reminiscent of what RVP used to be like.
A tale of two councils in Kent
Perusing the web, or 'surfing' if you prefer, this evening I came across an article to which I have provided the following link:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2011/jul/13/marlowe-theatre-canterbury-city-council
What an eye-opener! A few quotes from the article to whet your appetite.
If the public sector does not invest in infrastructure, no one else is going to do so," said Colin Carmichael, the city council's chief executive. "To be honest, we would make the same decision to go ahead if we were taking it now. This says we've got confidence in this place, come and invest here."
When city councillors, from all parties, voted to press ahead with the project two years ago, they knew the recession was biting but decided to go forward anyway as a way of boosting visitors to the city centre in the evenings and revitalising tourism and business in east Kent as a whole.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2011/jul/13/marlowe-theatre-canterbury-city-council
What an eye-opener! A few quotes from the article to whet your appetite.
If the public sector does not invest in infrastructure, no one else is going to do so," said Colin Carmichael, the city council's chief executive. "To be honest, we would make the same decision to go ahead if we were taking it now. This says we've got confidence in this place, come and invest here."
When city councillors, from all parties, voted to press ahead with the project two years ago, they knew the recession was biting but decided to go forward anyway as a way of boosting visitors to the city centre in the evenings and revitalising tourism and business in east Kent as a whole.
John Gilbey, Tory leader of the city council, donned a hard hat and fluorescent jacket to look over the site where builders and decorators remain hard at work, said: "Fifty councillors from all parties stood up and were counted. This has been a long-term ambition and this is a long-term gesture. We have had our reductions in funding too, but we have rationalised our services. Nobody will be able to point their finger at us and say we are abolishing essential services to build this theatre."
Canterbury received a cut in central funding of £2.7m this year, with a further £1.4m to come next year, equivalent to a 20% reduction followed by a further 13%. It has made savings of £2m and is sharing services with other local authorities. Not only is there a theatre, but a new library and art museum are also rising in the city, a further £13m in public expenditure. The council put up £17m towards the theatre, the county council a further £2m and more than £5m has been raised from trusts, business and private donations, with only £600,000 left to raise. The calculation is that, whereas the old theatre brought revenues of £13m a year to the city, the new one will increase that to £22m.
Canterbury received a cut in central funding of £2.7m this year, with a further £1.4m to come next year, equivalent to a 20% reduction followed by a further 13%. It has made savings of £2m and is sharing services with other local authorities. Not only is there a theatre, but a new library and art museum are also rising in the city, a further £13m in public expenditure. The council put up £17m towards the theatre, the county council a further £2m and more than £5m has been raised from trusts, business and private donations, with only £600,000 left to raise. The calculation is that, whereas the old theatre brought revenues of £13m a year to the city, the new one will increase that to £22m.
I take my hat off to Canterbury City Council: a total of £38.6 million on regeneration in Canterbury.
Now, look at Tunbridge Wells. The council has been scratching around for years and still we have no emerging picture of what it intends to do about town centre regeneration. Where is the vision and dynamism to drive forward projects on even half the scale of Canterbury?
For too long the council has been paying homage to the aspic brigade. Sadly the main opposition party in Tunbridge Wells, the Liberal Democrats, is even more reactionary than the Conservative majority. Liberal Democrats are engaged in a tawdry vote-grubbing exercise with no regard to the long term economic welfare of Tunbridge Wells.
When plans for the regeneration of the civic complex are published for consultation let us hope the plans bear some resemblance in approach to that of the forward looking councillors in Canterbury. I live in hope...................
Tuesday, 12 July 2011
Michael Evans
We have known for a long time that Michael Evans was unwell, but news of his death at 59 still comes as a shock.
Michael was supportive of the work of Tunbridge Wells Churches' Social Responsibility Group and Kent Industrial Mision.
He was a keen Leeds United supporter and a photograph of the 1960s team had pride of place on the wall above his desk.
Michael was supportive of the work of Tunbridge Wells Churches' Social Responsibility Group and Kent Industrial Mision.
He was a keen Leeds United supporter and a photograph of the 1960s team had pride of place on the wall above his desk.
European Union and The Eurozone
I think the position currently is illustrated well by the photograph:
Community led parish plan
In a previous blog I noted that Rusthall Parish Council had an item on the agenda concerning a community led parish plan. In the earlier blog are two links to websites which go into great detail about the value of such plans and also the process to produce them.
I support the development of a community led parish plan, so long as it is that, and not something which the parish council and/or the Village Association seek to control. The worst scenario would be for a few siren voices to dominate the process.
A community led plan must not become the 'be all and end all' of community engagement. One idea I like was suggested to me by the leader of a district council in Kent. He suggested that community meetings be held to discuss topics. Statutory bodies would attend and would undertake to go away and consider the issues raised and report back within three months on progress (or otherwise) in dealing with residents' concerns. This idea strikes me as being one which the parish council should take on board.
I support the development of a community led parish plan, so long as it is that, and not something which the parish council and/or the Village Association seek to control. The worst scenario would be for a few siren voices to dominate the process.
A community led plan must not become the 'be all and end all' of community engagement. One idea I like was suggested to me by the leader of a district council in Kent. He suggested that community meetings be held to discuss topics. Statutory bodies would attend and would undertake to go away and consider the issues raised and report back within three months on progress (or otherwise) in dealing with residents' concerns. This idea strikes me as being one which the parish council should take on board.
Monday, 11 July 2011
Weight watcher
Waiting in the doctor's surgery recently to have my ears syringed I noticed a chart which set out the 'healthy' weight of a person by height. On examination of the chart I noted that my 'healthy' weight is 12 stone 10 pounds (none of the metric rubbish on my blog).
Last Friday I stepped onto the scales and was shocked to discover I weigh 15 stone 1 pound.
Time for action!!
I am keeping a record of progress, or lack of it.
8 July: 15st. 1lb, 9 July: 14st. 12lb, 10 July: 14st. 13lb, 11 July: 14st. 11lb,
12 July: 14st. 12lb, 13 July: 14st. 13lb, 14 July: 14st. 12lb, 15 July: 14st. 11lb, 16 July: 14st 12lb,
17 July: 14st. 12lb, 18 July: 14st. 12lb, 19 July: 14st. 12lb, 20 July: 14st 11lb, 21 July: 14st 12lb, 22 July: 14st. 11lb, 23 July: 14st 12lb, 24 July: 14st. 12lb, 25 July: 14st, 12lb, 26th July: 14st. 12lb, 27th July: 14st 12lb, 28th July: 14st 12lb, 29th July: 14st 12lb, 30th July: 14st 13lb, 31st July: 14st. 12lb.
Last Friday I stepped onto the scales and was shocked to discover I weigh 15 stone 1 pound.
Time for action!!
I am keeping a record of progress, or lack of it.
8 July: 15st. 1lb, 9 July: 14st. 12lb, 10 July: 14st. 13lb, 11 July: 14st. 11lb,
12 July: 14st. 12lb, 13 July: 14st. 13lb, 14 July: 14st. 12lb, 15 July: 14st. 11lb, 16 July: 14st 12lb,
17 July: 14st. 12lb, 18 July: 14st. 12lb, 19 July: 14st. 12lb, 20 July: 14st 11lb, 21 July: 14st 12lb, 22 July: 14st. 11lb, 23 July: 14st 12lb, 24 July: 14st. 12lb, 25 July: 14st, 12lb, 26th July: 14st. 12lb, 27th July: 14st 12lb, 28th July: 14st 12lb, 29th July: 14st 12lb, 30th July: 14st 13lb, 31st July: 14st. 12lb.
Sunday, 10 July 2011
Rusthall Parish Council Meeting: 11 July
The next meeting of the parish council will be held on 11th July at the United Reformed Church commencing at 7.30PM.
An interesting item on the agenda is the development of a parish plan and public consultation regarding said plan.
Below is a link to a website devoted to community led plans.
http://www.clp-se.org.uk/#moreabout
The link below is devoted to community led plans.
http://www.ruralkent.org.uk/ourwork/community-planning.htm
An interesting item on the agenda is the development of a parish plan and public consultation regarding said plan.
Below is a link to a website devoted to community led plans.
http://www.clp-se.org.uk/#moreabout
The link below is devoted to community led plans.
http://www.ruralkent.org.uk/ourwork/community-planning.htm
Friday, 8 July 2011
Rusthall Fete: 16th July
The second Rusthall Fete is being held on Saturday 16th July from noon to 5.00PM at the Southwood Road Recreation Ground.
Last year's fete was a success and the organisers claim the forthcoming event will be even better.
Last year's fete was a success and the organisers claim the forthcoming event will be even better.
Habsburg Humour
Archduke Otto von Habsburg, who died on July 4 aged 98, began his public life as the infant Crown Prince of the multinational Austro-Hungarian Empire, and ended it as Father of the multinational European Parliament.
When he was asked by an aide in the European Parliament if he was attending the next Austria-Hungary football match, he apparently replied: 'Who are we playing?'.
When he was asked by an aide in the European Parliament if he was attending the next Austria-Hungary football match, he apparently replied: 'Who are we playing?'.
Tuesday, 5 July 2011
My other Blog: Communities Food Community Interest Company
My avid reader will know I am involved with Communities Food Community Interest Company which is seeking to tackle the problem of food poverty in Kent. You may visit my Blog by following this link:
http://communitiesfoodcic.blogspot.com/
http://communitiesfoodcic.blogspot.com/
Cessation of smoking
On Sunday evening I ran out of tobacco. This morning I decided not to go to the shop and buy new supplies. It is over twenty-four hours since I had a smoke and now there is no opportunity for me to acquire tobacco before 7.00AM tomorrow morning.
Will I give up the habit? I'll keep you posted.
Will I give up the habit? I'll keep you posted.
Saturday, 2 July 2011
Pedestrians beware!!
Dangerous place for pedestrians is Tunbridge Wells. Here is my list of danger spots.
1. Carr's Corner.
2. London Road/ Vale Road junction
3. Mount Ephraim Road (vehicles driving wrong way along one-way part of the road).
4. Roundabout by the Spa Hotel.
5. Grosvenor Road pedestrianised area. (Supposedly limited to buses and taxis between 10.00AM-4.00PM.)
6. Crossing A264 Langton Road between Rusthall Road and Coach Road junctions
7. Rusthall Road at its junction with Langton Road.
8. Eridge Road/Nevill Terrace roundabout.
1. Carr's Corner.
2. London Road/ Vale Road junction
3. Mount Ephraim Road (vehicles driving wrong way along one-way part of the road).
4. Roundabout by the Spa Hotel.
5. Grosvenor Road pedestrianised area. (Supposedly limited to buses and taxis between 10.00AM-4.00PM.)
6. Crossing A264 Langton Road between Rusthall Road and Coach Road junctions
7. Rusthall Road at its junction with Langton Road.
8. Eridge Road/Nevill Terrace roundabout.
Friday, 1 July 2011
Borough Council Magazine: oops
My copy of Tunbridge Wells Borough Council's magazine was delivered today. On page 20 we are informed that the Mayor is Councillor Mrs Elizabeth Warren. By page 21 the Mayor is identified correctly as Councillor Mrs Elizabeth Thomas! Wonder why the name Warren was used?
When I retired from the Borough Council in 2000 I was somewhat surprised when, following the elections, I looked at the mug-shots of councillors on the town hall noticeboard. There was my photograph and name! My successor, Bob Wratten was not happy: he had been omitted.
When I retired from the Borough Council in 2000 I was somewhat surprised when, following the elections, I looked at the mug-shots of councillors on the town hall noticeboard. There was my photograph and name! My successor, Bob Wratten was not happy: he had been omitted.
White Elephants or Community Assets?
In Southborough there is a community centre known as Cafe Bliss. It was established by the Better Living in Southborough Society and has been a roaring success. Situated on the main road there is a heavy footfall which undoubtedly helps trade. Location, location, location. Local statutory and voluntary organisations hold surgeries at the premises and there is a thriving youth group. The success of Cafe Bliss owes much to the hard work and commitment of Elaine Lawrence.
In Showfields, Tunbridge Wells there is the Number One Community Centre. For various reasons the cafe has not been a success in recent years, the community does not engage with the centre and it has proved difficult to establish a vibrant community group.
The TN2 community centre in Sherwood is well located close to the shops and is quite busy. Unfortunately the layout of the building is appalling and this acts as a severe limitation on the activities which can be undertaken.
A problem common to Number One and TN2 is the degree of 'ownership' by the local communities. The communities do not have control of the centres, although it is not for want of trying by the local authorities to develop community engagement and participation.
One vibrant community in Tunbridge Wells has a thriving community group, the Rusthall Village Association. Rusthall has a recently formed parish council, a lunch club for older people and the long-standing Rusthall Youth and Community Project. The lunch club is held at one of the church halls and the youth project uses the local library outbuilding and a mobile hut it purchased and erected.
The two church halls and the Rusthall Club (a workingmens' club) are venues for community activities. The church halls are used by a variety of organisations.
The local housing association has built sheltered accommodation in Rusthall which should be open this September. Part of the building is a 'community facility', including a cafe. It will be interesting to see which local voluntary organisations make use of the facilities and the extent of public usage. One can but hope it will be successful. Given the nature of of the Rusthall community it could do well. My main concern is the effect it might have on the viability of other venues.
In Showfields, Tunbridge Wells there is the Number One Community Centre. For various reasons the cafe has not been a success in recent years, the community does not engage with the centre and it has proved difficult to establish a vibrant community group.
The TN2 community centre in Sherwood is well located close to the shops and is quite busy. Unfortunately the layout of the building is appalling and this acts as a severe limitation on the activities which can be undertaken.
A problem common to Number One and TN2 is the degree of 'ownership' by the local communities. The communities do not have control of the centres, although it is not for want of trying by the local authorities to develop community engagement and participation.
One vibrant community in Tunbridge Wells has a thriving community group, the Rusthall Village Association. Rusthall has a recently formed parish council, a lunch club for older people and the long-standing Rusthall Youth and Community Project. The lunch club is held at one of the church halls and the youth project uses the local library outbuilding and a mobile hut it purchased and erected.
The two church halls and the Rusthall Club (a workingmens' club) are venues for community activities. The church halls are used by a variety of organisations.
The local housing association has built sheltered accommodation in Rusthall which should be open this September. Part of the building is a 'community facility', including a cafe. It will be interesting to see which local voluntary organisations make use of the facilities and the extent of public usage. One can but hope it will be successful. Given the nature of of the Rusthall community it could do well. My main concern is the effect it might have on the viability of other venues.
Wednesday, 29 June 2011
The truth will out.
Following the 'revelation' by the Courier newspaper that a well known Tunbridge Wells' person was a 'racist' there has been no response on the letters page. Of course, there may have been responses which have not been published. Certainly the person castigated in the newspaper has not been granted a right of reply.
One of the issues mentioned by the paper as being an example of racism was a comment by the person 'outed' as a racist that white children were at risk from Asian men.
Low and behold what do we read today and have paraded across BBC News. Follow the link:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13957129
In particular may I draw your attention to this paragraph from the article:
Earlier this year, the former Home and Justice Secretary Jack Straw said that while offenders came from all backgrounds, there was a specific problem of young Pakistani men targeting white girls because they regarded them as "easy meat".
Now, I haven't noted Jack Straw being castigated as a racist, yet our local press had an hysterical outburst against the local resident who said much the same as Jack Straw.
As I have stated before, the problem of grooming is not confined to one ethnic group but, as the BBC said in a news item, the proportion of Asian men involved in grooming is higher than the proportion of Asian men in the UK population.
It is easy to stifle debate by using the epithet 'racist' against someone who raises serious inconvenient issues. Admittedly the resident 'liked' on Facebook a joke that I and I am sure many others would consider to be in very poor taste. However, 'ironic' comedians (Frankie Boyle springs to mind) utter jokes in appalling taste and are defended by the media.
The main issue though is not who perpetrates these vile activities but why it is permitted to happen. Child protection legislation and statutory agencies have failed the children. It is a scandal. One can only hope that there has not been a reluctance to act for fear of being branded racist. Unfortunately there are reports from Lancashire that this was indeed the case.
One of the issues mentioned by the paper as being an example of racism was a comment by the person 'outed' as a racist that white children were at risk from Asian men.
Low and behold what do we read today and have paraded across BBC News. Follow the link:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13957129
In particular may I draw your attention to this paragraph from the article:
Earlier this year, the former Home and Justice Secretary Jack Straw said that while offenders came from all backgrounds, there was a specific problem of young Pakistani men targeting white girls because they regarded them as "easy meat".
Now, I haven't noted Jack Straw being castigated as a racist, yet our local press had an hysterical outburst against the local resident who said much the same as Jack Straw.
As I have stated before, the problem of grooming is not confined to one ethnic group but, as the BBC said in a news item, the proportion of Asian men involved in grooming is higher than the proportion of Asian men in the UK population.
It is easy to stifle debate by using the epithet 'racist' against someone who raises serious inconvenient issues. Admittedly the resident 'liked' on Facebook a joke that I and I am sure many others would consider to be in very poor taste. However, 'ironic' comedians (Frankie Boyle springs to mind) utter jokes in appalling taste and are defended by the media.
The main issue though is not who perpetrates these vile activities but why it is permitted to happen. Child protection legislation and statutory agencies have failed the children. It is a scandal. One can only hope that there has not been a reluctance to act for fear of being branded racist. Unfortunately there are reports from Lancashire that this was indeed the case.
Saturday, 25 June 2011
The future of Tunbridge Wells
The local press carries letters from people expressing opinions about the future of Tunbridge Wells. One is from Ptolemy Dean who, apart from having a rant at a former elected councillor, doesn't have much to say except that Tunbridge Wells is better than Maidstone or Ashford. Another writer pleads for the extension of the Pantiles cafe culture.
What is needed is definition of what is the supposed character of Tunbridge Wells it is sought to defend and/or enhance. More specifically, how will this character be diminished by the redevelopment of the civic complex and former cinema sites?
Seems to me that much of what has been said so far is the special pleading of a small group of elitist snobs which has little relevance to the needs of majority and certainly no regard for the future prosperity of the town.
What is needed is definition of what is the supposed character of Tunbridge Wells it is sought to defend and/or enhance. More specifically, how will this character be diminished by the redevelopment of the civic complex and former cinema sites?
Seems to me that much of what has been said so far is the special pleading of a small group of elitist snobs which has little relevance to the needs of majority and certainly no regard for the future prosperity of the town.
Noise, noise, noise
I was delighted to read that Gravesham Council has confiscated the audio equipment of a twerp who was broadcasting to the neighbourhood from his home. Councils should be far more pro-active in dealing with the problem of noise.
Where I live we have the following noise pollution
Where I live we have the following noise pollution
- Parties in gardens accompanied by very loud music until the early hours of the morning.
- The idiot wannabe drummer parading his lack of ability to the neighbourhood.
- The Rusthall FC Football Fayre: two days of incessant loudspeaker use. Could be heard over a half mile radius.
Friday, 24 June 2011
Rusthall Parish Council Clerk
According to the local newspaper Rusthall Parish Council has an 'interim clerk' who will be in post until May 2012. The clerk is Paul Cummins. He works for Tunbridge Wells Borough Council.
Is the Parish Council paying Mr Cummins or is the Borough Council subsidising the Parish Council? Is Mr Cummins doing this on a voluntary basis?
Perhaps we should not read too much into the fact that Mr Cummins will be in post until next May. The inference I draw is that the parish Council is not going to receive sufficient funding in the current financial year to employ its own clerk.
Is the Parish Council paying Mr Cummins or is the Borough Council subsidising the Parish Council? Is Mr Cummins doing this on a voluntary basis?
Perhaps we should not read too much into the fact that Mr Cummins will be in post until next May. The inference I draw is that the parish Council is not going to receive sufficient funding in the current financial year to employ its own clerk.
Tuesday, 21 June 2011
Recruiting
My local Conservative Association is on a recruitment drive for potential candidates for local elections. It has published a press release which contains the following:
'Nicholas Rogers, the Association’s Deputy Chairman with responsibility for campaigning said,
“Across the Borough there are hundreds of people with much to offer. Some of our most successful candidates in recent years have come from outside the usual political structures.
This initiative is designed to reach those people who would not normally consider themselves as politicians and is a good example of David Cameron’s Big Society. “ '
Think I will go to the meeting people are invited to attend.
'Nicholas Rogers, the Association’s Deputy Chairman with responsibility for campaigning said,
“Across the Borough there are hundreds of people with much to offer. Some of our most successful candidates in recent years have come from outside the usual political structures.
This initiative is designed to reach those people who would not normally consider themselves as politicians and is a good example of David Cameron’s Big Society. “ '
Think I will go to the meeting people are invited to attend.
Rusthall Parish Council
I missed the June meeting of the parish council as I was on holiday in Somerset. Set me thinking though. How do I get to see the minutes of council meetings? Some parish councils send a copy of the minutes to the local library and/or have a website from which it is possible to download agendas, minutes etc.
Sunday, 19 June 2011
Rusthall Blues
So, only two members of the public attended the first meeting of Rusthall Parish Council following the annual meeting. Much as might be expected, given the boring nature of most parish council business. Two is better than none, as often was the case at meetings of Tunbridge Wells Borough Council until Roy Bullock agitated the local citizenry.
The view expressed by a local resident that the failure of the public to attend does not bode well is wide of the mark. I imagine there will be a good turnout when a contentious matter is on the agenda.
The newly elected Borough councillor for Rusthall, Victor Webb, has weighed in with the comment that the majority of people did not want a parish council. Admittedly, most residents did not bother to express an opinion during the consultations, but of those that did a big majority were 'for' a parish council. Using Cllr Webb's logic, the majority of people did not want him as a Borough councillor.
Cllr Webb points out that 40 people attended the Village Association AGM and asserts there is more appetite for the association than the parish council. The difference between the two is that the former is a voluntary organisation and people can speak at meetings. The parish council is a statutory body elected by residents at which members of the public only have limited speaking rights. Different as chalk and cheese.
Let's wait and see how the parish council performs, that is how it will be judged. Why be so negative at this early stage in the council's life?
As I stated in an earlier blog, the funding farce is a disgrace. The received wisdom was that Tunbridge Wells Borough Council would make available a repayable loan of £40,000 to tide the parish council over the first year. TWBC has offered a 'gift' of £500 and presumably the £40,000 will become available once the parish council has drawn up a financial plan. It is sensible to have a financial plan and the difficulty is that until the council came into being it could not agree a plan. Presumably the £500 will pay for essential expenditure for a couple of months by which time the financial plan could be in place. I agree with Councillor Webb, TWBC should have been more pro-active in preparing a draft financial plan, particularly as the Leader of TWBC was one of the staunchest supporters of the proposal to form a parish council.
The view expressed by a local resident that the failure of the public to attend does not bode well is wide of the mark. I imagine there will be a good turnout when a contentious matter is on the agenda.
The newly elected Borough councillor for Rusthall, Victor Webb, has weighed in with the comment that the majority of people did not want a parish council. Admittedly, most residents did not bother to express an opinion during the consultations, but of those that did a big majority were 'for' a parish council. Using Cllr Webb's logic, the majority of people did not want him as a Borough councillor.
Cllr Webb points out that 40 people attended the Village Association AGM and asserts there is more appetite for the association than the parish council. The difference between the two is that the former is a voluntary organisation and people can speak at meetings. The parish council is a statutory body elected by residents at which members of the public only have limited speaking rights. Different as chalk and cheese.
Let's wait and see how the parish council performs, that is how it will be judged. Why be so negative at this early stage in the council's life?
As I stated in an earlier blog, the funding farce is a disgrace. The received wisdom was that Tunbridge Wells Borough Council would make available a repayable loan of £40,000 to tide the parish council over the first year. TWBC has offered a 'gift' of £500 and presumably the £40,000 will become available once the parish council has drawn up a financial plan. It is sensible to have a financial plan and the difficulty is that until the council came into being it could not agree a plan. Presumably the £500 will pay for essential expenditure for a couple of months by which time the financial plan could be in place. I agree with Councillor Webb, TWBC should have been more pro-active in preparing a draft financial plan, particularly as the Leader of TWBC was one of the staunchest supporters of the proposal to form a parish council.
Saturday, 18 June 2011
Further vindication for local man accused of racism
I have commented at some length on the 'expose' of a resident of Tunbridge Wells as a racist by the local newspaper. The initial report was spread across three pages of the local paper and included a large photograph on the front page. The paper has continued to report on this.
The person concerned has been given no right of reply.
Two matters have arisen in the past few days which add credibility to the comments made by the person vilified in the paper.
The first is to be found in the following link:
http://www.christian.org.uk/news/bishop-backs-bill-to-tackle-sharia-courts/
The second is this report in the Daily Telegraph:
A group of Asian men "trafficked, raped or sexually abused" young girls, after bombarding them with gifts and attention, a court was told yesterday.
The nine, who were mostly married, joined forces with some acting as pimps, others used their homes as brothels and some using them as prostitutes.
The men, all from Telford, Shropsbire, were charged with a total of 56 counts relating to eight girls aged between 13 and 17.
When the Tunbridge Wells' resident claimed these things were happening he was accused of being 'racist'. Earlier this month a number of Asian men were arrested in Rochdale for similar offences.
Manchester police have made further arrests:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-13759651
We shall have to wait to learn if the arrested people in Manchester are, to use the Daily Telegraph's word, 'Asian'. What has happened in Rochdale and Telford gives credibility to what the Tunbridge Wells' resident said.
The prosecuting counsel in the Telford case warned the jury that, as the trial unfolded, they would be introduced to a world "that I expect few of you were aware of". Clearly the editor of the local newspaper is not aware (really?), or if he is, it shows how easy it is to attempt to stifle debate by playing the racist card. Yet here we are talking about a massive failure of child protection procedures to which some would have us close our eyes, as to comment is 'racist'.
The person concerned has been given no right of reply.
Two matters have arisen in the past few days which add credibility to the comments made by the person vilified in the paper.
The first is to be found in the following link:
http://www.christian.org.uk/news/bishop-backs-bill-to-tackle-sharia-courts/
The second is this report in the Daily Telegraph:
A group of Asian men "trafficked, raped or sexually abused" young girls, after bombarding them with gifts and attention, a court was told yesterday.
The nine, who were mostly married, joined forces with some acting as pimps, others used their homes as brothels and some using them as prostitutes.
The men, all from Telford, Shropsbire, were charged with a total of 56 counts relating to eight girls aged between 13 and 17.
When the Tunbridge Wells' resident claimed these things were happening he was accused of being 'racist'. Earlier this month a number of Asian men were arrested in Rochdale for similar offences.
Manchester police have made further arrests:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-13759651
We shall have to wait to learn if the arrested people in Manchester are, to use the Daily Telegraph's word, 'Asian'. What has happened in Rochdale and Telford gives credibility to what the Tunbridge Wells' resident said.
The prosecuting counsel in the Telford case warned the jury that, as the trial unfolded, they would be introduced to a world "that I expect few of you were aware of". Clearly the editor of the local newspaper is not aware (really?), or if he is, it shows how easy it is to attempt to stifle debate by playing the racist card. Yet here we are talking about a massive failure of child protection procedures to which some would have us close our eyes, as to comment is 'racist'.
Back from my hols.
My, hasn't a lot been happening in the world this week? We go away for five days and return to read that Greece is in an even worse mess, that the UK government is making 'U-turns' and the Jeremiahs are focusing their attention on Rusthall Parish Council.
We enjoyed visiting Bridport, West Bay, Lyme Regis, Abbotsbury and Forde Abbey. Enjoyed the Flowers and Tribute ales. We stayed near Crewkerne and found an excellent establishment for our evening meals - the George in the centre of Crewkerne. Spent some time browsing in second hand bookshops and acquired a few tombs on railway history.
We enjoyed visiting Bridport, West Bay, Lyme Regis, Abbotsbury and Forde Abbey. Enjoyed the Flowers and Tribute ales. We stayed near Crewkerne and found an excellent establishment for our evening meals - the George in the centre of Crewkerne. Spent some time browsing in second hand bookshops and acquired a few tombs on railway history.
Sunday, 12 June 2011
Racism: an abused word.
Let's get one matter out in the open. My Facebook site is eclectic and by that I mean I publish posts and comments from a very wide spectrum of political and religious opinion. Some of the material on my page is not politically correct (PC): indeed many of my opinions would not be regarded as PC by the PC brigade - an intolerant bunch masquerading as liberals. But then I have always believed in calling a spade a spade - or is that non-PC and should I write shovel?
Racism, as was to be found in South Africa and the United States of America where people were (in the USA in some aspects still are) discriminated against solely on the colour of their skin, has no place in a modern 21st century society and is to be fought against. Nor has discrimination based on class, faith beliefs or nationality. In this regard I may be regarded by some as a weepy liberal, but for me the starting position is 'treat others as you would wish to be treated' and that I think is not far from the position taken by the vast majority of citizens in the UK. We have a reputation for tolerance and calm under the severest provocation. Thousands died in the Second World War in defence of tolerant civilised society. The state in our country has not gone around murdering millions of its citizens or subjected peoples as happened with the USSR and Germany.
I do worry when I read reports in the press of the police being reluctant to act because they will be accused of racism. The law should be applied without fear or favour, but unfortunately (to put it mildly) accusations of racism are hurled around and police action is tempered. If anything is likely to make racial tension worse it is a perception that some in our society gain preferential treatment by playing the race card.
However, we must not suppose that racism is not a problem in this country. The issue is how to tackle it in a way which does not increase antagonism. In order to do this we have to analyse the issues which raise tensions. Racial tension is the symptom of underlying problems which have nothing to do with ethnicity, nationality or religious beliefs. Until we tackle these issues the symptoms will persist.
The issues, in random order, include housing, employment, welfare benefits, over-stretched public services, multi-culturalism (in its widest sense) and immigration. Sadly debate on these issues is stifled often by playing the race card. Until recently, it was almost impossible to discuss immigration without the epithet 'racist' being thrown round to stop debate.
We need to debate these issues in a rational way, but it must not be used to threaten any individuals who have UK citizenship and settled expectations of a quiet life. Until we have that debate the forces of intolerance will continue to flourish and spread their evil.
Racism, as was to be found in South Africa and the United States of America where people were (in the USA in some aspects still are) discriminated against solely on the colour of their skin, has no place in a modern 21st century society and is to be fought against. Nor has discrimination based on class, faith beliefs or nationality. In this regard I may be regarded by some as a weepy liberal, but for me the starting position is 'treat others as you would wish to be treated' and that I think is not far from the position taken by the vast majority of citizens in the UK. We have a reputation for tolerance and calm under the severest provocation. Thousands died in the Second World War in defence of tolerant civilised society. The state in our country has not gone around murdering millions of its citizens or subjected peoples as happened with the USSR and Germany.
I do worry when I read reports in the press of the police being reluctant to act because they will be accused of racism. The law should be applied without fear or favour, but unfortunately (to put it mildly) accusations of racism are hurled around and police action is tempered. If anything is likely to make racial tension worse it is a perception that some in our society gain preferential treatment by playing the race card.
However, we must not suppose that racism is not a problem in this country. The issue is how to tackle it in a way which does not increase antagonism. In order to do this we have to analyse the issues which raise tensions. Racial tension is the symptom of underlying problems which have nothing to do with ethnicity, nationality or religious beliefs. Until we tackle these issues the symptoms will persist.
The issues, in random order, include housing, employment, welfare benefits, over-stretched public services, multi-culturalism (in its widest sense) and immigration. Sadly debate on these issues is stifled often by playing the race card. Until recently, it was almost impossible to discuss immigration without the epithet 'racist' being thrown round to stop debate.
We need to debate these issues in a rational way, but it must not be used to threaten any individuals who have UK citizenship and settled expectations of a quiet life. Until we have that debate the forces of intolerance will continue to flourish and spread their evil.
Worrying report on Tower Hamlets
I have written before on this blog concerning the sensationalist reporting by the Courier newspaper in Tunbridge Wells on the views expressed by a resident of Tunbridge Wells.
The resident's comments on the dangers posed by adherents of fundamentalist Islam were castigated as 'racist'. The newspaper did not test the veracity of any of the resident's claims. Since the item appeared in the paper articles have appeared in national newspapers (including one paper owned by the same organisation as the Courier) which support much of what the resident claimed.
The latest report is in today's Daily Telegraph. Click here for the link to the report.
The resident's comments on the dangers posed by adherents of fundamentalist Islam were castigated as 'racist'. The newspaper did not test the veracity of any of the resident's claims. Since the item appeared in the paper articles have appeared in national newspapers (including one paper owned by the same organisation as the Courier) which support much of what the resident claimed.
The latest report is in today's Daily Telegraph. Click here for the link to the report.
Friday, 10 June 2011
The sage of Lamberhurst opines
Roy Bullock, the deposed Leader of Tunbridge Wells Borough Council and de-selected Conservative candidate, has broken cover and fired a salvo of shells at his opponents. Welcome back Roy.
His subject matter is, as might be expected, the issues concerning the future of the civic complex. His letter, in today's Courier, takes careful aim at his opponents.
One target is the Aspic Brigade whom he describes as a vocal minority. His comment is scathing. The M & N report on consultation on town centre sites has given publicity to more reasonable voices.....from a far wider age group. The Aspic Brigade does not represent a dominant view and no minority group should be able to wield a veto when the future of our borough is at stake. The venom is palpable.
His second target is the current cabinet as he fears momentum could be lost. The comments of Councillor Jukes, reported in my blog earlier today, do give the impression that matters are proceeding very slowly, hence my question: when?
His final shell is aimed at the new cabinet and the new leader: I just hope we have the leadership in place to see the scheme positively progressed in 2011. Ouch.
Under Bullock's leadership the Council bungled the public information/consultation process, so much so that the economic arguments for redevelopment were lost in a welter of recrimination about process. I see signs that the new leadership is committed to the economic objectives. The consultation will be all the better for having a new Leader as it will be the issues that are discussed, rather than a consultation with the bear in the room.
I have been disappointed by the banal response of the Leader of the Liberal Democrats to the M & N report, describing it as a red-herring and a whitewash. He criticises also the report for not coming to a conclusion - how could it when there is such a diverse range of opinions? I had hoped the Liberal Democrats would rise above political mud-slinging and engage in constructive dialogue about the economic future of the town. Their current tactic is to ally with the Aspic Brigade which I believe is misconceived. the Aspic Brigade made the initial running and the Liberal Democrats jumped on the band-waggon. Unfortunately for the Liberal Democrats the N & M report does not show a predominance of support for the Aspic Brigade's view, hence the attempt by the Liberal Democrat Leader to rubbish the document.
His subject matter is, as might be expected, the issues concerning the future of the civic complex. His letter, in today's Courier, takes careful aim at his opponents.
One target is the Aspic Brigade whom he describes as a vocal minority. His comment is scathing. The M & N report on consultation on town centre sites has given publicity to more reasonable voices.....from a far wider age group. The Aspic Brigade does not represent a dominant view and no minority group should be able to wield a veto when the future of our borough is at stake. The venom is palpable.
His second target is the current cabinet as he fears momentum could be lost. The comments of Councillor Jukes, reported in my blog earlier today, do give the impression that matters are proceeding very slowly, hence my question: when?
His final shell is aimed at the new cabinet and the new leader: I just hope we have the leadership in place to see the scheme positively progressed in 2011. Ouch.
Under Bullock's leadership the Council bungled the public information/consultation process, so much so that the economic arguments for redevelopment were lost in a welter of recrimination about process. I see signs that the new leadership is committed to the economic objectives. The consultation will be all the better for having a new Leader as it will be the issues that are discussed, rather than a consultation with the bear in the room.
I have been disappointed by the banal response of the Leader of the Liberal Democrats to the M & N report, describing it as a red-herring and a whitewash. He criticises also the report for not coming to a conclusion - how could it when there is such a diverse range of opinions? I had hoped the Liberal Democrats would rise above political mud-slinging and engage in constructive dialogue about the economic future of the town. Their current tactic is to ally with the Aspic Brigade which I believe is misconceived. the Aspic Brigade made the initial running and the Liberal Democrats jumped on the band-waggon. Unfortunately for the Liberal Democrats the N & M report does not show a predominance of support for the Aspic Brigade's view, hence the attempt by the Liberal Democrat Leader to rubbish the document.
Run-in with the planners
I was fortunate to be a councillor before the cabinet system was introduced. From time to time the planning committee would disagree with the recommendation of officers, quite rightly, as the committee does not exist simply to rubber-stamp the conclusion of officers. The chairman of the committee was 'a first amongst equals' and in his/her role as chairman would hold meetings with the head of the council's planning department.
Since the introduction of the cabinet system we have now in Tunbridge Wells a cabinet member who holds the planning portfolio. The relationship between the cabinet member and the planning department should be on strategic issues and not on individual applications.
The recent spat on a planning application in Pembury is disquieting. The application was to build on Green Belt and the argument was over whether or not to apply the special circumstances provisions to over-ride the presumption of no development on Green Belt land.
The planning committee decided to apply the special circumstances provisions and approve the application. It is not clear what the recommendation of the planners was but the planners clearly did their duty in advising that special circumstances did permit development on Green Belt land.
Councillor Ransley is the cabinet member who holds the planning portfolio: the same person who had the barmy idea that some off-peak trains to London from Tunbridge Wells should terminate at Cannon Street.
It is a worrying state of affairs when the holder of the planning portfolio rails against officers giving impartial advice they are under an obligation to provide and against a decision of the planning committee having taken that advice into consideration. Planning committees sit as 'quasi-judicial, bodies and have to consider each application on its merits in the context of planning law.
Councillor Ransley's claim that the 'matter of green belt must be the same for everyone' indicates a worrying ignorance of planning law. His notion that the decision in this application sets a dangerous precedent is ill-founded. Previous decisions can be distinguished on the facts to neuter the effect of them on later ones and clearly the presumption against development on Green Belt land has to be overturned by the special circumstances of a particular application.
The inference I draw is that Councillor Ransley has attacked the impartiality and professionalism of the planners: now that is worrying.
Where's the dosh?
Rusthall residents believed that the newly formed Rusthall Parish Council would receive a loan of £40,000 from Tunbridge Wells Borough Council to tide it over the first year of operation, the reason being that no parish precept could be raised before the Council commenced functioning. Doubts as to this happening have surfaced.
It is reported that the Borough Council intends to make a 'gift' of £500 to the Parish Council instead of the loan,.
However a Borough Council officer is quoted as stating that the council had agreed to provide financial support to the parish council, to be repaid when the parish receives its precept instalment in April 2012
What I find surprising is that the parish council is intent on megaphone diplomacy, there is a meeting of the parish council next week.at which the matter will be discussed. Quite why this issue has been trailed through the local press before the position is explained at next week's meeting defeats me.
The confusion is worrying and hardly inspires confidence. Time for the Leader of the Borough Council, who represents Rusthall, to bang a few heads together in the two councils.
It is important to remember that it is public money. My concern is that Rusthall Parish Council does not see £40,000 as an amount it must spend. Obviously it needs to expend money on administration, room hire etc, but spare us vanity schemes.
It is reported that the Borough Council intends to make a 'gift' of £500 to the Parish Council instead of the loan,.
However a Borough Council officer is quoted as stating that the council had agreed to provide financial support to the parish council, to be repaid when the parish receives its precept instalment in April 2012
What I find surprising is that the parish council is intent on megaphone diplomacy, there is a meeting of the parish council next week.at which the matter will be discussed. Quite why this issue has been trailed through the local press before the position is explained at next week's meeting defeats me.
The confusion is worrying and hardly inspires confidence. Time for the Leader of the Borough Council, who represents Rusthall, to bang a few heads together in the two councils.
It is important to remember that it is public money. My concern is that Rusthall Parish Council does not see £40,000 as an amount it must spend. Obviously it needs to expend money on administration, room hire etc, but spare us vanity schemes.
Town Hall Dynamism:
I publish a report in this week's local paper:
Cllr David Jukes, deputy leader of the council, said: "The new cabinet has been in post for four months and I have been in my role as property and major projects portfolio holder for only two weeks since completing my duties as mayor.
"The thoughts we have on the future shape of the town are different to the previous cabinet and once we have crystallised our ideas they will be put to the council and the public forum before any major action is taken."
When?
Cllr David Jukes, deputy leader of the council, said: "The new cabinet has been in post for four months and I have been in my role as property and major projects portfolio holder for only two weeks since completing my duties as mayor.
"The thoughts we have on the future shape of the town are different to the previous cabinet and once we have crystallised our ideas they will be put to the council and the public forum before any major action is taken."
When?
Localism: my opinions for what they are worth
The splendid MP for Tunbridge Wells, Greg Clark, is responsible for the government's localism agenda. This agenda is based on the idea that central government should devolve powers, duties etc down the chain to local government and communities. It is part of the mechanism for the 'Big Society', but is distinct from it.
Whilst I might have quibbles over some of the proposals, the general thrust is in the right direction.
Under Labour we have had a form of localism, the devolution of powers to governments in Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland. The unfinished business is how to deal with the West Lothian Question. I favour the creation of an English Parliament. It is inequitable that the future arrangements of the NHS in England will be voted on by MPs from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. These MPs cannot vote on the NHS in their respective lands as health is a devolved matter.
What could happen after the next general election is that a majority of English MPs vote on a purely English matter one way, but the vote is reversed when Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland MPs votes are added. Of course, should Scotland gain independence (which I doubt will happen in the foreseeable future) then the problem is diminished but not resolved, as there will be still the Welsh and Northern Ireland MPs voting on English issues.
In Europe we have had the opposite of devolution. More and more power is gravitating to the European Union from member states. The EU now has rights of representation at the United Nations and is opening 'embassies' across the world. There is talk of a president of the EU being directly elected. These are the trappings of a state, to which may be added the pressure being brought to bear for a common fiscal policy across the EU.
The setting up of the eurozone had an inherent weakness in that there was a failure to establish a fiscal union. I am sure the mandarins in Brussels took the long view: it was a risk worth taking as it was a step along the road to greater union and the establishment of a European state.
So, let's have some real localism: establish an English parliament and take back powers ceded to the EU.
Whilst I might have quibbles over some of the proposals, the general thrust is in the right direction.
Under Labour we have had a form of localism, the devolution of powers to governments in Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland. The unfinished business is how to deal with the West Lothian Question. I favour the creation of an English Parliament. It is inequitable that the future arrangements of the NHS in England will be voted on by MPs from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. These MPs cannot vote on the NHS in their respective lands as health is a devolved matter.
What could happen after the next general election is that a majority of English MPs vote on a purely English matter one way, but the vote is reversed when Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland MPs votes are added. Of course, should Scotland gain independence (which I doubt will happen in the foreseeable future) then the problem is diminished but not resolved, as there will be still the Welsh and Northern Ireland MPs voting on English issues.
In Europe we have had the opposite of devolution. More and more power is gravitating to the European Union from member states. The EU now has rights of representation at the United Nations and is opening 'embassies' across the world. There is talk of a president of the EU being directly elected. These are the trappings of a state, to which may be added the pressure being brought to bear for a common fiscal policy across the EU.
The setting up of the eurozone had an inherent weakness in that there was a failure to establish a fiscal union. I am sure the mandarins in Brussels took the long view: it was a risk worth taking as it was a step along the road to greater union and the establishment of a European state.
So, let's have some real localism: establish an English parliament and take back powers ceded to the EU.
Wednesday, 8 June 2011
Further vindication of Adrian's opinions
My regular reader (hello) will recall that I have posted a number of blogs concerning Adrian who was the subject of a three page 'expose' in the local newspaper including the whole of the front page. He was accused of being racist.
The paper has continued to attack Adrian and claims that racial tension has risen in the area since it published the articles. Obviously the paper does not see the irony that if had not published racial tension would not have risen. Must say I have seen no signs of racial tension on my frequent visits to the area.
One of the points raised in the first article was Adrian's claim that an ethnic minority was grooming, or worse, young children.
Below is a link to an item on the BBC today:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-13694250
I think Adrian should send it to the local paper with a demand for an apology.
The paper has continued to attack Adrian and claims that racial tension has risen in the area since it published the articles. Obviously the paper does not see the irony that if had not published racial tension would not have risen. Must say I have seen no signs of racial tension on my frequent visits to the area.
One of the points raised in the first article was Adrian's claim that an ethnic minority was grooming, or worse, young children.
Below is a link to an item on the BBC today:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-13694250
I think Adrian should send it to the local paper with a demand for an apology.
Tuesday, 7 June 2011
Vanishing buildings
Some people come over all nostalgic about buildings and mount campaigns to save them from the demolition ball. The campaigns have little to do with the intrinsic merit of the building to be demolished and the plans for re-development but have more to do with memories of activities in the building or a sense of loss at a feature of the landscape disappearing.
It is a shock to return to places and note that the landscape has changed.
On a visit to Coventry I discovered that one of my watering holes, The Alhambra, had disappeared. Chesterfield FC's ground at Saltergate has closed and doubtless will soon be replaced by an housing development. Roker Park, for a long time the home of Sunderland FC, is now an housing estate.
Railway stations bring back memories of journeys. Many stations I used in my younger days have gone: Sheffield Victoria, Nottingham Victoria, Whittington Moor, Chesterfield Central, Manchester Exchange to name but a few.
The industrial landscape has changed beyond recognition in many parts of the country: steel and iron works have gone, pits have closed, heavy manufacturing has disappeared. In some locations it is hard to imagine what was there before.
We like old and familiar surroundings and when things change feel a sense of loss but of itself it is no basis for opposition to change. Opposition often is based on personal selfishness rather than consideration for the wider need. It is the former which I believe is the driving force of the ancients seeking to preserve the Tunbridge Wells civic complex.
The former Tunbridge Wells Council offices in Cranbrook are in the process of demolition. My memories of the building go back to the 1999-2000 when I chaired appeal panels hearing cases brought by residents against the decisions of the Council on housing benefit. I am not to be drawn into the spat in Cranbrook concerning community facilities, but I am not bereft as the demolition ball swings at the offices, nor shall I should the civic complex in Tunbridge Wells be demolished.
As parts of our personal heritage disappear, we may pause and regret their passing, but not for long as wallowing in nostalgia, for what has been, is self-defeating.
It is a shock to return to places and note that the landscape has changed.
On a visit to Coventry I discovered that one of my watering holes, The Alhambra, had disappeared. Chesterfield FC's ground at Saltergate has closed and doubtless will soon be replaced by an housing development. Roker Park, for a long time the home of Sunderland FC, is now an housing estate.
Railway stations bring back memories of journeys. Many stations I used in my younger days have gone: Sheffield Victoria, Nottingham Victoria, Whittington Moor, Chesterfield Central, Manchester Exchange to name but a few.
The industrial landscape has changed beyond recognition in many parts of the country: steel and iron works have gone, pits have closed, heavy manufacturing has disappeared. In some locations it is hard to imagine what was there before.
We like old and familiar surroundings and when things change feel a sense of loss but of itself it is no basis for opposition to change. Opposition often is based on personal selfishness rather than consideration for the wider need. It is the former which I believe is the driving force of the ancients seeking to preserve the Tunbridge Wells civic complex.
The former Tunbridge Wells Council offices in Cranbrook are in the process of demolition. My memories of the building go back to the 1999-2000 when I chaired appeal panels hearing cases brought by residents against the decisions of the Council on housing benefit. I am not to be drawn into the spat in Cranbrook concerning community facilities, but I am not bereft as the demolition ball swings at the offices, nor shall I should the civic complex in Tunbridge Wells be demolished.
As parts of our personal heritage disappear, we may pause and regret their passing, but not for long as wallowing in nostalgia, for what has been, is self-defeating.
Monday, 6 June 2011
Pumping more money into Sherwood
Over the years a lot of money has been pumped into Sherwood, Tunbridge Wells, both capital and revenue. Capital expenditure on the Little Forest Children's Centre and the TN2 Community Centre are two of the major projects. Now Town & County Housing Association, the major social housing landlord in the area, is pumping money in as part of the Sherwood Regeneration Project (SRP).
One does wonder what the social return on this investment will be. The SRP did not get off to an auspicious start, with accusations of secrecy and failure to consult with the local populace. When two borough councillors spilt the beans they were hauled over the coals by the chief executive of the council (as I commented on last year in this blog).
I have become more cynical about the value of regeneration projects, community development initiatives and community engagement schemes as they are 'top-down' usually and do not engage with the causes of problems. Instead, they provide sticking plasters to put over the symptoms.
The past sixteen years had seen me working in areas of deprivation in Kent and East London and my cynicism is borne of experience of seeing projects, initiatives and schemes fail as they do not engage with the real issues and certainly do not provide solutions.
One only has to look at the indices of deprivation in Thanet to realise that years of investment have failed to produce significant improvements. The same can be said of others parts of Kent and indeed nationwide. Why is this? Will the Big Society and Localism produce a step change in improving well-being in areas of deprivation? I have my doubts
One does wonder what the social return on this investment will be. The SRP did not get off to an auspicious start, with accusations of secrecy and failure to consult with the local populace. When two borough councillors spilt the beans they were hauled over the coals by the chief executive of the council (as I commented on last year in this blog).
I have become more cynical about the value of regeneration projects, community development initiatives and community engagement schemes as they are 'top-down' usually and do not engage with the causes of problems. Instead, they provide sticking plasters to put over the symptoms.
The past sixteen years had seen me working in areas of deprivation in Kent and East London and my cynicism is borne of experience of seeing projects, initiatives and schemes fail as they do not engage with the real issues and certainly do not provide solutions.
One only has to look at the indices of deprivation in Thanet to realise that years of investment have failed to produce significant improvements. The same can be said of others parts of Kent and indeed nationwide. Why is this? Will the Big Society and Localism produce a step change in improving well-being in areas of deprivation? I have my doubts
Sunday, 5 June 2011
A visit to Sherwood.
No, not Sherwood Nottinghamshire, but Sherwood Tunbridge Wells. A very warm day, unfortunately rather windy. Never mind, a call on the way at the Robin Hood public house put me in the right frame of mind to enjoy the Sherwood Carnival.
The highlight of the event was the procession. The Tunbridge Wells town crier led the way, closely followed by a band of drummers which drowned out the crier's bell. Sandwiched between the two was the Deputy Mayor of Tunbridge Wells, John Smith and the Deputy Mayoress. The Deputy Mayor wore his chain of office, but I did note that his jacket came off as the unremitting heat from the sun beat down on him and the rest of the procession.
Congratulations to John Smith for marching in the procession. Just the thing I would expect of a man who was deselected by the Conservatives, stood as an Independent and beat comprehensively the Conservative candidate.
Apart from meeting long standing friends, my reason for the visit was to sniff the Sherwood air for signs of the racial tension which the local newspaper claims has risen following articles the paper published alleging that a couple of Sherwood residents were racists. People of ethnic minority groups were circulating at the carnival and didn't give the impression of being tense, indeed everyone was very relaxed. Now the paper would not claim that racial tensions were rising without any evidence would it? Doubtless the evidence will be published, or won't it?
I commend the article that can be read by clicking on this link:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jun/03/poor-white-britons-discrimination-not-racial
When I commented on the local newspaper's first article I wrote:
The real issues relate to deprivation, not race, and unless tackled minority groups will continue to be the scapegoats. It is the message we should be concerned about, not vilifying one of the messengers.
Sherwood has serious problems of deprivation and in my experience residents have not scapegoated minority groups.
The highlight of the event was the procession. The Tunbridge Wells town crier led the way, closely followed by a band of drummers which drowned out the crier's bell. Sandwiched between the two was the Deputy Mayor of Tunbridge Wells, John Smith and the Deputy Mayoress. The Deputy Mayor wore his chain of office, but I did note that his jacket came off as the unremitting heat from the sun beat down on him and the rest of the procession.
Congratulations to John Smith for marching in the procession. Just the thing I would expect of a man who was deselected by the Conservatives, stood as an Independent and beat comprehensively the Conservative candidate.
Apart from meeting long standing friends, my reason for the visit was to sniff the Sherwood air for signs of the racial tension which the local newspaper claims has risen following articles the paper published alleging that a couple of Sherwood residents were racists. People of ethnic minority groups were circulating at the carnival and didn't give the impression of being tense, indeed everyone was very relaxed. Now the paper would not claim that racial tensions were rising without any evidence would it? Doubtless the evidence will be published, or won't it?
I commend the article that can be read by clicking on this link:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jun/03/poor-white-britons-discrimination-not-racial
When I commented on the local newspaper's first article I wrote:
The real issues relate to deprivation, not race, and unless tackled minority groups will continue to be the scapegoats. It is the message we should be concerned about, not vilifying one of the messengers.
Sherwood has serious problems of deprivation and in my experience residents have not scapegoated minority groups.
Friday, 3 June 2011
A strange decision
When I was a councillor on Tunbridge Wells Borough Council I attended once a fortnight meetings of the Western Area Planning Committee. The morning was spent travelling round on a mini-bus looking at sites which were the subject of planning applications. In the afternoon the committee met to determine the applications. It was a long day, particularly if there were contentious and/or complicated applications. We met at the Town Hall in Royal Tunbridge Wells.
Eastern Area meetings were held at the Council's offices in Cranbrook. Following closure of the Cranbrook offices the meetings moved to Hawkhurst.
The reason Eastern Area meetings were not held in Royal Tunbridge Wells was for convenience. The parties to applications, objectors and councillors did not have to traipse into Royal Tunbridge Wells. The planners had staff at Cranbrook who moved to Tunbridge Wells when the Cranbrook offices closed. It was far better for a few officers to travel a long way to meetings rather than everyone except the officers.
The Council has taken the strange decision to hold Eastern Area meetings at the Town Hall. Cue for protests from parish councils that they have not been consulted.
It is rather strange that at the very time the buzz words are 'localism', community engagement' and 'civic participation' Tunbridge Wells Borough Council is centralising a service and making it more difficult and expensive for residents to attend meetings.
Eastern Area meetings were held at the Council's offices in Cranbrook. Following closure of the Cranbrook offices the meetings moved to Hawkhurst.
The reason Eastern Area meetings were not held in Royal Tunbridge Wells was for convenience. The parties to applications, objectors and councillors did not have to traipse into Royal Tunbridge Wells. The planners had staff at Cranbrook who moved to Tunbridge Wells when the Cranbrook offices closed. It was far better for a few officers to travel a long way to meetings rather than everyone except the officers.
The Council has taken the strange decision to hold Eastern Area meetings at the Town Hall. Cue for protests from parish councils that they have not been consulted.
It is rather strange that at the very time the buzz words are 'localism', community engagement' and 'civic participation' Tunbridge Wells Borough Council is centralising a service and making it more difficult and expensive for residents to attend meetings.
Shaping up nicely
The borough council elections are eleven months away but already the thoughts of the political parties will be turning to Rusthall.
UKIP won its first seat on the council last May, winning the seat from the Conservative incumbent in Rusthall. UKIP delivered three leaflets and the candidate canvassed many electors as well as 'pressing the flesh' on the high street.
The Conservative campaign did not take off. There will be a vigorous campaign next May as the sitting councillor is the Leader of Tunbridge Wells Borough Council.
The Liberal Democrats published the best election leaflet. I thought they would win the seat repeating what happened in a by-election in Pembury where UKIP took votes from the Conservatives thus enabling the Lib Dems to win the seat from the Conservatives. The Lib Dem candidate has been elected chairman of Rusthall Village Association and should he decide to stand next May will be in a far stronger position to win the seat.
Could be close and difficult to predict who might win. The Labour Party may decide to contest the seat, after all the chairman of the parish council is a former Labour councillor on the Borough Council.
All this is good news for the residents of Rusthall as individuals and parties seek to gain support. Nothing like the prospect of a closely fought election to encourage the political parties to listen to the electorate and seek to gain its favour.
UKIP won its first seat on the council last May, winning the seat from the Conservative incumbent in Rusthall. UKIP delivered three leaflets and the candidate canvassed many electors as well as 'pressing the flesh' on the high street.
The Conservative campaign did not take off. There will be a vigorous campaign next May as the sitting councillor is the Leader of Tunbridge Wells Borough Council.
The Liberal Democrats published the best election leaflet. I thought they would win the seat repeating what happened in a by-election in Pembury where UKIP took votes from the Conservatives thus enabling the Lib Dems to win the seat from the Conservatives. The Lib Dem candidate has been elected chairman of Rusthall Village Association and should he decide to stand next May will be in a far stronger position to win the seat.
Could be close and difficult to predict who might win. The Labour Party may decide to contest the seat, after all the chairman of the parish council is a former Labour councillor on the Borough Council.
All this is good news for the residents of Rusthall as individuals and parties seek to gain support. Nothing like the prospect of a closely fought election to encourage the political parties to listen to the electorate and seek to gain its favour.
Rusthall Village Association news
Too often, candidates at local elections disappear after the election to be seen again only when the next election is pending. Congratulations then to Tom Snook, the Liberal Democrat candidate in Rusthall for the borough council elections, for standing and being elected chairman of the Rusthall Village Association.
Congratulations also to Andy Richards on becoming Vice-Chairman, although the local newspaper is somewhat wide of the mark when it states he only 'just' failed to be elected to the parish council.
Congratulations also to Andy Richards on becoming Vice-Chairman, although the local newspaper is somewhat wide of the mark when it states he only 'just' failed to be elected to the parish council.
Quite flows the Don
From the Wicker Arches, through Attercliffe, Grimesthorpe, Brightside, Wincobank and Meadow Hall to Rotherham flows the River Don. Along the valley ran competing railway systems, canals and tramways all to serve the steel industry and the communities huddled between the massive buildings producing steel. If ever there were dark satanic steel mills they were to be found here. And then it virtually all came to an end as global economic forces and government policies took effect.
I knew the area well. On a visit a few years ago I was stunned by the dereliction and decay. Vistas that in my youth had seemed unchangeable had vanished. Heavy industry and the support services it required had disappeared, almost. Crossing the Tinsley viaduct the scene to left and right had been transformed. Even the iconic cooling towers by the viaduct had been demolished.
Out of the ashes of heavy industry has sprung a cathedral to consumerism, the Meadowhall shopping centre: 1.4m sq. ft. and adjoining massive car parks. Property developers have drawn up plans to turn Meadowhall into the UK's largest out-of-town shopping destination which will add 700,000 sq.ft of retail space, although not connected to the existing building.
The proposal has been driven, according to the Daily Telegraph, by the growing shift in retail expenditure from high streets to the internet and regional shopping centres.
How long before there is a proposed expansion of Bluewater?
The issue for towns in the catchment area of Bluewater has been always how to counter the competition and attract people to shop in the high streets. Maidstone has developed the Fremlin Centre, Ashford has the new County Square complex, but what of Tunbridge Wells? The Royal Victoria Place shopping centre has gone decidedly down market in recent years as the owners sweat the asset.
Royal Tunbridge Wells has two major eyesores: the empty supermarket opposite the railway station and the derelict cinema site opposite the town hall. There are ideas for regeneration, policies, surveys and consultations. The impression one gains is that the local council is beginning to tackle the regeneration issues with much more determination, but the fear is that the Aspic Brigade will dominate the debate and, should they win, sentence the town to slow economic decline.
We need repeated the bold approach the council took to the development of the Royal Victoria Centre if we are to avert a significant decline in the town's economic prosperity.
I knew the area well. On a visit a few years ago I was stunned by the dereliction and decay. Vistas that in my youth had seemed unchangeable had vanished. Heavy industry and the support services it required had disappeared, almost. Crossing the Tinsley viaduct the scene to left and right had been transformed. Even the iconic cooling towers by the viaduct had been demolished.
Out of the ashes of heavy industry has sprung a cathedral to consumerism, the Meadowhall shopping centre: 1.4m sq. ft. and adjoining massive car parks. Property developers have drawn up plans to turn Meadowhall into the UK's largest out-of-town shopping destination which will add 700,000 sq.ft of retail space, although not connected to the existing building.
The proposal has been driven, according to the Daily Telegraph, by the growing shift in retail expenditure from high streets to the internet and regional shopping centres.
How long before there is a proposed expansion of Bluewater?
The issue for towns in the catchment area of Bluewater has been always how to counter the competition and attract people to shop in the high streets. Maidstone has developed the Fremlin Centre, Ashford has the new County Square complex, but what of Tunbridge Wells? The Royal Victoria Place shopping centre has gone decidedly down market in recent years as the owners sweat the asset.
Royal Tunbridge Wells has two major eyesores: the empty supermarket opposite the railway station and the derelict cinema site opposite the town hall. There are ideas for regeneration, policies, surveys and consultations. The impression one gains is that the local council is beginning to tackle the regeneration issues with much more determination, but the fear is that the Aspic Brigade will dominate the debate and, should they win, sentence the town to slow economic decline.
We need repeated the bold approach the council took to the development of the Royal Victoria Centre if we are to avert a significant decline in the town's economic prosperity.
Thursday, 2 June 2011
More YUK
As my regular reader knows I have an aversion to competitions to name the 'volunteer of the year', 'charity of the year' etc.
I commend the wheeze being promoted by ITV1 as a classic example of YUK.
NOMINATE BRITAIN’S UNSUNG HEROES
I commend the wheeze being promoted by ITV1 as a classic example of YUK.
A BRAND NEW ITV1 SHOW IS LOOKING TO RECOGNISE INSPIRATIONAL PEOPLE
Do you know an inspiring individual who has set up a small charity?
Do you know someone who has battled adversity but fundraises incessantly despite their own difficulties?
Is there someone who works tirelessly for others in your local community?
Would you like to reward a great volunteer in your local area?
Would you like to thank someone for an act of bravery or for saving someone’s life?
Do you know someone who has made great sacrifices to help others?
If you know someone who deserves to be recognised then please get in touch!
We ask that you do not tell the person or cause you have nominated as we would like this to be a surprise!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)