tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27611069887163084742024-03-19T01:02:07.591+00:00Theology RamblingsKENT COMMUNITY ACTIVIST: acerbic, carping, caustic, curmudgeonly,critical, cynical, grumpy, moaning, sardonic and plain speaking.
Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.comBlogger2247125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-73528084408251764112024-03-18T20:01:00.000+00:002024-03-18T20:01:22.486+00:00Part 261. A 'must read' Jim Palmer article. . I concur with all this. Article by<b>Jim PALMER.</b><div><br></div><div>It’s unfortunate for all those years as a pastor that I cheapened Jesus by making him into supernatural being who would save the world, and not as a courageous and revolutionary human person who came to love it. I can’t relate to the religious Jesus as a sinless saint, but I feel like I understand the Jesus who found deep peace within himself, but could also became unhinged by the abuses of religion. <div><br></div><div>With that in mind, here are 10 things about Christianity that Jesus would not endorse if he had a say: </div><div><br></div><div>1. That his vision for a transformed society, got twisted into an afterlife fantasy about heaven.</div><div><br></div><div>2. That a religion was formed to worship his name, instead of a movement to advance his message.</div><div><br></div><div>3. That the gospel says his death solved the problem of humankind's separation from God, instead of accepting that his life revealed the truth that there is no separation from God.</div><div><br></div><div>4. That the religion bearing his name was conceived by the theories and doctrines of Paul, instead of the truth Jesus lived and demonstrated.</div><div><br></div><div>5. That he was said to exclusively be God in the flesh, putting his example out of reach, rather than teaching that we all share in the same spirit that empowered his character and life.</div><div><br></div><div>6. That the religion that claims his name, teaches that his wisdom and teachings are the only legitimate way to know truth and God.</div><div><br></div><div>7. The idea that humankind stands condemned before God and deserving of Divine wrath and eternal conscious judgement, requiring the death of Jesus to fix it.</div><div><br></div><div>8. That people are waiting on Jesus to return to save the world and end suffering, rather than taking responsibility for saving the world and solving suffering ourselves.</div><div><br></div><div>9. That people think there is magical potency in uttering the name of Jesus, rather than accessing our own natural powers and capabilities to effect change.</div><div><br></div><div>10. That people have come to associate Jesus with church, theology, politics and power, rather than courage, justice, humanity, beauty and love.</div><div><br></div><div>Jim Palmer</div></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-25246018438805848522024-03-18T20:00:00.002+00:002024-03-19T01:01:33.762+00:00Part 260. My theological position: a summary. Section ThreeThree quotations: <div><br></div><div><i>Our religion should be a sincere search for God <b>within us</b>, a search that will bring forth fruits of love, justice and truth.</i></div><div><b>Oscar Romeo</b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><i>God is a verb that invites us to live, to love and to be.</i></div><div><b>John Shelby Spong </b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><i>I understand that the ultimate reality that the word 'God' indicates is woven into the fabric of all existence and in the ground of my being.</i></div><div><b>Jim Palmer </b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div>God is love. The ministry of Jesus is encapsulated in the words: love God, love others. Reports of the ministry of Jesus contained in the synoptic gospels indicate the challenge Jesus engaged in against the prevailing religious, political and economic systems. His support for the poor, the disadvantaged, the marginalised and the discriminated against comes through loud and clear.</div><div><br></div><div>When reading the synoptic gospels we must consider it in the context of the times and also the motivation of the authors which is a factor in determining content.</div><div><br></div><div>We have to understand the concepts and principles articulated in the synoptic gospels and apply them through the lens of love to our current context. That is the challenge for progressive christianity as it seeks to give effect to love, justice and truth for all.</div><div><b><br></b></div><div><b><br></b></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-13644562391006289872024-03-15T17:11:00.001+00:002024-03-15T17:19:30.453+00:00Part 259. My theological position: a summary. Section TwoWho or what is God? Does God exist? Theories as to the existence and nature of God are simply just that, theories. It is all conjecture and ultimately a matter of personal faith. Hebrews 11:1 encapsulates it well:<div><br></div><div><i>Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see.</i></div><div><i><br></i></div><div>John Shelby Spong commented on the nature of God thus:</div><div><br></div><div><i>God is not a noun, that demands to be described, God is a verb that invites us to love, to live, to be.</i></div><div><br></div><div>God is a human construct, a concept symbolising that which we cannot understand, a concept commandeered for different purposes throughout history. To my mind, for followers of Jesus God's being and purpose is love for humanity, for freedom, inclusion, equity, for the poor, marginalised and discriminated against.</div><div><br></div><div>An associated matter concerns prayer. I question the idea that God listens to and responds to prayer and the value of intercessionary prayer. I query the motives of individuals who, to justify their actions, assert they are in response to the Holy Spirit. </div><div><br></div><div>We may in faith believe in the efficacy of prayer, the leading of the Holy Spirit but let us not anthropomorphise God. God is beyond description.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-3818498734007112302024-03-15T00:47:00.000+00:002024-03-15T00:47:47.937+00:00Part 258. My theological position: a summary. Section One.As I have mused on theological matters in this blog some of my beliefs have developed, others have stayed as they were whilst yet others have been rejected. It is all personal opinion, though I trust I have taken counsel from others far more experienced and knowledgeable in theology than I can ever hope to be. I eschew flowery and opaque language. Jargon leaves me cold. Keep it simple but not simplistic.<div><br></div><div>So what <i>is </i>my theological stance? </div><div><br></div><div><i>I let go of the notion that the Bible is a divine product. I learned that it is a human cultural product, the product of two ancient communities, biblical Israel and early Christianity. As such, it contained their understandings and affirmations, statements not coming directly or somewhat directly from God.....I realised that whatever "divine revelation" and the "inspiration of the Bible" meant (if they meant anything, they did not mean that the Bible was a divine product with divine authority.</i></div><div><b>Marcus Borg </b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div>The above may be read in conjunction with the following statement by Borg.</div><div><br></div><div><i>Properly understood the Bible is a potential ally to the progressive Christian passion for transformation of ourselves and the world. It is our great heritage. Along with Jesus, to whom it is subordinate, it is our greatest treasure.</i></div><div><i><br></i></div><div>What is <i>properly understood</i>? How do we understand the meaning of words? How do we develop understanding of the message words are intended to convey? How do we interpret the bible in our context? The ideas of Jacques Derrida and other postmodernists inform us that the meaning of literature is not determined by the author but by our own understanding. A sensible approach. How are we to know what the authors of the Bible intended? Each generation brings its own interpretation to bear on scripture. In this context I proffer this gem.</div><div><br></div><div><i>My point is not that those ancient people told literal stories and we are not smart enough to take them symbolically, but that they told them symbolically and we are now dumb enough to take them literally.</i></div><div><b>John Dominic Crossan</b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div>So, should we take the synoptic gospels stories about Jesus literally or symbolically and if the latter what <i>do </i>they symbolise? Perhaps that God is love expressed symbolically in human form in Jesus.</div><div><b><br></b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-64193464354892250572024-03-12T23:09:00.000+00:002024-03-12T23:09:12.929+00:00Part 257. More quotations<i>The Kingdom of God is not a matter of getting individuals to heaven, but of transforming the life on earth into the harmony of heaven. </i><div><b>Walter Rauschenbusch </b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div>Your 'yes' to God requires your 'no' to all injustice, to all evil, to all lies.</div><div><b>Dietrich Bonhoeffer </b></div><div><br></div><div><i>We cannot profess our solidarity with those who are oppressed when we are unwilling to confront the oppressor.</i></div><div><b>Henri Nouwen</b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div>How can we be the church of Jesus unless we reflect the ministry of Jesus? Is the church a radical incarnation of the ministry of Jesus or a private social club?</div><div><b>Yvette Flunder</b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><i>The prophetic tasks of the Church are to tell the truth in a society that lives and illusion, grieve in a society that practices denial, and express hope in a society that lives in despair</i><b>.</b></div><div><b>Walter Brueggemann </b></div><div><i><br></i></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><b><br></b></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-80821205105186300932024-03-10T12:29:00.003+00:002024-03-10T14:29:28.915+00:00Part 256. Theology of Social Justice <div><i>A political ecclesiology organising then, begins with the Spirit's call to Christian churches to build relationships of liberation and love, and this mission is concretizing in the experience of counterpublic churches, building relational power for political, economic and racial justice.</i></div><div><b>Aaron Stauffer. </b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div>Phew!. Fortunately <b>Kissing Fish Book </b>Facebook page has provided an explanation in plain English.</div><div><br></div><div>"Aaron Stauffer's work encapsulates a profound perspective on the role of Christian churches in societal transformation. It suggests that a political ecclesiology, or the understanding of the church's role in political engagement, commences with the Spirit's call to establish relationships rooted in liberation and love. This call extends beyond mere rhetoric, finding concrete expression in the lived experiences of counterpublic churches. <br></div><div><br></div><div>In the context of counterpublic churches, the mission takes shape, and these faith communities become agents of change. They actively contribute to building relational power, not only within their congregations but also in the broader social landscape. The objective is clear: to address pressing issues of political, economic, and racial justice.</div><div><br></div><div>Stauffer invites contemplation on the dynamic interplay between spirituality and social action. He challenges traditional notions of the church as a passive observer, urging a more active and engaged role in the pursuit of justice. The transformative journey outlined in his work beckons believers to heed the Spirit's call, actively participate in the mission of liberation and love, and contribute to the collective effort for a more just and equitable society."</div><div><br></div><div>I concur with Aaron Stauffer's statement but would add 'and other forms of discrimination' after 'racial justice'.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-51385698888534718132024-03-07T22:57:00.002+00:002024-03-11T10:44:30.053+00:00Part 255. Theologians and commentatorsOn my Facebook page: <i>John Hopkinson Theology Page </i>I have posted a cartoon that has the simple message that Christian faith is about loving God and loving neighbours. Simple that is until the churches and theologians came along to complicate matters. <div><br></div><div>Of course the cartoonist has a point, but it would be wrong to be overly critical of theologians who proffer their insights into the meaning and application of the two Great Commandments set out by Jesus in the synoptic gospels. </div><div><br></div><div>My thinking and hence my faith has been influenced by a number of commentators in the fields of philosophy, politics, law, economics and theology. It is a long held view of mine that we cannot understand faith in a vacuum, we must consider faith, particularly its application, in the context of the society in which we live. The same may be said of the study of most disciplines: law, economics, politics, sociology etc.</div><div><br></div><div>So, who have been major influences in my faith journey? Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Walter Brueggemann, Kenneth Galbraith, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Bernice King, Jacques Derrida, Richard Rohr, Jim Palmer, Leonardo Boff, Oscar Romero, Gustavo Gutierrez, Desmond Tutu, Martin Luther King Jnr, Don Cupitt, David Hayward, John Pavlovitz, John Robinson, Marcus Borg, Richard Holloway and Rowan Williams. </div><div><br></div><div>So from all this my faith comes down to: follow the two Great Commandents, campaign for social justice for the poor, marginalised and discriminated against, reject the notion of a metaphysical God.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><div><br></div><div><br></div></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-50196176869216050352024-03-05T13:40:00.000+00:002024-03-05T13:40:52.981+00:00Part 254. KCC budget cutsCentral goverment has put a financial squeeze on local authorities leaving the latter to receive the odium for cuts they make to achieve balanced budgets. Decisions as to where councils cut their budgets is left to local discretion. Statutory services have to be maintained and any ring-fenced resources must be applied in keeping with the purpose of the provision.<div><br></div><div>Clearly difficult and unpopular decisions have to be taken by the politicians in local government. </div><div><br></div><div>In Kent closure of some Surestart centres, dismembering youth services, funding for homelessness charities and reduction in support funding for disabled people are all in the pipeline. One can have some sympathy for the dilemma facing the policians.</div><div><br></div><div>But where is the concerted opposition of churches to these attacks on the vulnerable in our society? Where are campaigns by the churches, not only at local level but also at national level? Many local councils are in a similar plight to Kent. The blame rests squarely on the shoulders of The Treasury and ministers. </div><div><br></div><div>For individuals affected by cuts it may then be the case that they turn to the already overstretched voluntary sector, including churches.</div><div><br></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-67621483693663780752024-03-03T23:35:00.000+00:002024-03-03T23:35:09.438+00:00Part 253. Quotations (2)<i>Jesus called people to follow him in a way of living. He does not require his followers to accept a catalogue of religious beliefs or adopt a set of spiritual practices. Rather, he offered them a new way to live their daily lives. As a result, the earliest members of the Jesus movement were known as followers of the way.</i><div><b>Kurt Struckmeyer</b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div>God is calling the Church to something new, but we hold things back when we do things according to tradition as opposed to partnering with God in the new way.</div><div><b>Doug Addison </b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><i>The Church is not memories; we are not just looking in a rear-view mirror. The Church is moving forward and needs new perspectives.</i></div><div><b>Oscar Romero </b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div>Never be afraid to raise your voice for honesty, truth and compassion against injustice and tyranny and greed.</div><div><b>William Faulkner</b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><i>Being human, even just a poor worker, is being made in the image of God. That is not communism or subversion. It is the word of God that enlightens everyone.</i></div><div><i><b>Oscar Romero </b></i></div><div><i><b><br></b></i></div><div>Always be sure that you struggle with Christian weapons. Never succumb to the temptation of becoming bitter. As you press on for justice, be sure you move with justice and discipline, using only the weapon of love.</div><div><b>Martin Luther King Jnr </b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><i>What is needed is a realisation that power without love is reckless and abusive, and that love without power is sentimental and anemic. Power at its best is love implementing the demands of justice and justice at its best is love correcting everything that stands against love.</i></div><div><b>Martin Luther King Jnr </b></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-10885974487411925092024-03-02T19:49:00.000+00:002024-03-02T19:49:37.694+00:00Part 252.. On the cusp of change?For those of a progressive disposition the proceedings on Saturday 2nd March at The Salvation Army <i>Belonging and Believing </i> conference have gone well, if one believes the feedback accurately reflects the substance and tone of presentations and discussions.<div><br></div><div>The Territorial Leaders have said: </div><div><br></div><div><i>Be assured we are not talking about changing our vision of fullness of life for all with Jesus, or our mission - to share the good news, to serve others without discrimination, to nurture disciples of Jesus, to care for creation, to seek justice and Reconciliation - or our values of passion, compassion, respect, mutual accountability, boldness and integrity, or our calling to follow Jesus. Rather we are talking about how we live this out together through discipleship that is radical and inclusive.</i></div><div><i><br></i></div><div>Radical and inclusive.</div><div><br></div><div>A question posed at the conference:</div><div><br></div><div><i>How can the UKI Territory shape discipleship that is exciting with a radical vision of belonging committing, and serving the Kingdom of God through The Salvation Army?</i></div><div><i><br></i></div><div>That word <i>radical </i>again. </div><div><i><br></i></div><div>The Membership Working Party will be taking on board the views expressed at the conference, together with the results of the <i>Belonging and Believing Survey, </i>and many other expressions of opinion. The next step will be for the Working Party to make recommendations to Territorial leaders. It is to be hoped that in the interests of transparency the recommendations and the reasoning behind them are placed in the public domain.</div><div><br></div><div>Let us hope the recommendations are radical and inclusive, not a damp squib.</div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-85981085868285857142024-03-01T17:58:00.001+00:002024-03-01T18:54:46.000+00:00Part 251. Belonging and Believing:The Big ConversationThis weekend The Salvation Army is holding a conference at Warwick University to consider <i>inter alia </i>the results of a survey that asked what it means to belong and believe as members or supporters of the Army and what needs to change. The event is fully subscribed.<div><br></div><div>A large section of this week's <i>Salvationist </i>is taken up with information concerning the event and issues raised by the survey.</div><div><br></div><div>What is striking in the <i>Salvationist </i>articles<i> </i>is the strength of support for LBGTQ+ inclusion. This has given great encouragement to those within the Army who have long campaigned for full inclusion.</div><div><br></div><div>Will the discussions at the conference reinforce the quest for full inclusion or will conservative fundamentalist evangelicals hold sway? In some ways the arguments reflect the current division within the Church of England.</div><div><br></div><div>The Membership Working Party will take on board the results of the survey, what is said at the conference, as well many other representations it has received, and then draw up its recommendations to be put to the territorial leadership this summer. Will the recommendations and the reasoning behind them be in the public domain? They should be as the need for accountability and tranparency has been promoted by the General. </div><div><br></div><div>TSA is an international organisation. Any move towards full inclusion in the United Kingdom and Ireland Territory will be viewed unfavourably in many Salvationists in the USA and West Africa. However doing what is right for the UK&I Territory should be implemented for that territory alone.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-14536309508459336332024-03-01T14:29:00.001+00:002024-03-01T14:42:37.064+00:00Part 250. Down on the estate (2)Please read in conjunction with Part 249.<div><br></div><div>There are over 850 significant social housing estates in England in which the Church of England is being instructed by General Synod to engage by planting churches and seeking new church leaders (including ordinands). Frankly I think this in a mission impossible simply on the basis of sheer size of the task.</div><div><br></div><div>One can understand why the CofE wishes to engage in deprived areas. The history of the CofE is one of loss to Methodist and Salvation Army churches. The two latter denominations are also in decline and looking to re-engage in such areas. The fear is that there will be competition rather than collaborative or partnership working. </div><div><br></div><div>Successful sustainable community engagement in areas of deprivation, that includes individuals who are destitute, are notoriously difficult to achieve. The last thing people want or need is outsider religious do-gooders preaching at them. Building successful community engagement is a very slow process. Trust is only gained over a long period. It is essential that any community group is <i>of </i>the community, <i>with</i> the community and <i>for</i> the community. </div><div><br></div><div>In areas of multiple deprivation the church must be seen to be campaigning for change, campaigning that has to be led from within the community. Control must rest with a community group, not outsiders whether as individuals or as representatives of a church. </div><div><br></div><div>Nowhere in the General Synod deliberations is there so much as a passing reference to Liberation Theology. The principles of LT are applicable to church engagement in areas of deprivation, indeed are essential. The church, of whatever denomination, is not there only to apply bandages to the wounded but to engage with communities for them to campaign for structural change.</div><div><br></div><div>It is a huge undertaking the CofE is embarked on. To achieve its target will require a massive commitment of human and financial resources. It would have been preferable to set a much lower initial target and then build on the experience gained.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><div><br></div><div><br></div></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-86602131906776198292024-02-29T21:05:00.002+00:002024-02-29T21:15:25.252+00:00Part 249. Down on the estate (1)An excellent initiative in many respects but i have some reservations. Below is the text of a Church of England press release.<div><br></div><div>General Synod<div><br></div><div>General Synod calls for redoubling of efforts to create new churches on estates</div><div>26/02/2024</div><div><br></div><div>Estate churches thanked by Bishop for 'utterly beautiful' work in face of challenges including poverty and rising levels of destitution</div><div><br></div><div>The Church of England needs many more leaders from working class backgrounds and deprived communities, the General Synod has heard, in a debate where members voted to redouble efforts to establish churches on housing estates.</div><div><br></div><div>The Synod re-committed the Church of England to setting up a church on every significant social housing estate, five years on from first giving its backing to this goal.</div><div><br></div><div>Members also backed moves to double the number of young active Christians on housing estates and ensure that young people from estates and low-income communities are trained as children’s and young people’s leaders among other forms of ministry.</div><div><br></div><div>The Bishop of Blackburn, Philip North, who introduced the debate, called on the Church of England to act now to reverse the "slow erosion" of Christian life on estates.</div><div><br></div><div>Dioceses and Theological Education institutions (TEIs) – where people are trained for ordained ministry - should be encouraged to consider more ways of training lay and ordained leaders from estates and deprived communities, he said.</div><div><br></div><div>“Estates churches and the wider church desperately need leaders called from our estates and deprived communities,” he said.</div><div><br></div><div>He added: “I’m convinced that there is an underground army of evangelists and prophets out there which a culturally middle class church is simply missing.”</div><div><br></div><div>The Synod also backed a call for the Church of England to address financial inequalities between dioceses.</div><div><br></div><div>Bishop Philip said the wealth disparities between dioceses are a "scandal" that "we cannot allow to endure".</div><div><br></div><div>He told Synod members that there have been "many advances" since the General Synod gave its backing five years ago for the drive to set up a church on every significant social housing estates in the country.</div><div><br></div><div>New estate churches have been planted by all Anglican traditions, he said, and a number of dioceses, such as Southwark, Norwich, London and Southwell and Nottingham have appointed advisers.</div><div><br></div><div>He added that around £100 million of Lowest Income Communities Funding and £40 million in Strategic Development Funding has been allocated to estates or economically deprived communities.</div><div><br></div><div>But he said there had also been "significant" setbacks including the impact of the pandemic.</div><div><br></div><div>At least 10 more estates churches have closed in the past five years, most with no plan for replanting and there are still at least 850 significant estates that are not served by a Christian community, he said.</div><div><br></div><div>Bishop Philip said the Synod had a chance to acknowledge and thank a "remarkable" group of lay people and priests who minister on estates.</div><div><br></div><div>He said the work on estates churches had been "utterly beautiful" in the face of multiple challenges including the pandemic and increasing levels of poverty and destitution.</div><div><br></div><div>The motion</div><div>Synod members gave their unanimous backing to the following Estates Evangelism motion (364 votes for, none against and no abstentions):</div><div><br></div><div>This Synod:</div><div><br></div><div>*dedicate itself afresh to the goal of achieving a loving, serving and worshipping Christian community on every significant social housing estate to mark the fifth anniversary of Synod Motion GS2122</div><div><br></div><div>*commend the work of all who minister on our estates and gives thanks for those Dioceses who have responded positively to the 2019 Motion</div><div><br></div><div>*call on all Dioceses to include in their strategic mission and ministry plans the goal of planting and renewing churches on, and/or doubling the number of young active disciples in social housing estates/other economically marginalised communities</div><div><br></div><div>*call on the whole church to address as a matter of urgency the structural and financial injustices that prevent flourishing and sustainable worshipping communities on every estate (for example, the financial inequalities between dioceses and the distribution of LInC Funding)</div><div><br></div><div>*commit itself to taking the necessary steps to raise up and support a new generation of lay and ordained leaders from estates and working class backgrounds (by for example addressing the recommendations of the Ministry Council’s Report ‘Let Justice Roll Down.’) at all levels in the church including a commitment to invest creatively in local and grassroots forms of ministry and leadership training.</div><div><br></div><div>*Request the Estates Evangelism Task Group to work alongside diocesan vocations advisers, the 30,000 Project and other related bodies to ensure that priority is given to the formation of young people from estates and low-income communities to serve as children’s and young people’s leaders, as well as in other forms of Christian ministry.</div></div><div><br></div><div>End of press release. My comments will be in the next post.</div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-35927318822079434852024-02-29T16:47:00.001+00:002024-02-29T17:41:45.166+00:00Part 248. Apologies but no resignations.In Part 243. <i>As Ollie said to Stan </i>mention is made of the independent report (Wilkinson Report) into the shambles that is the Church of England's safeguarding policies and procedures. It is a damning report.<div><br></div><div> General Synod agreed that as a matter of priority the report be sent to committees to consider and make recommendations for change. Profuse apologies offered to victims of abuse and members of the then Independent Safeguarding Board. <div><br></div><div>However no resignations from anyone with responsibility for this abject failure to protect the vulnerable. Heads should have rolled.</div><div><br></div></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-70233976156102293152024-02-29T13:45:00.000+00:002024-02-29T13:45:21.098+00:00Part 247. The shambles continuesThe paper and proposals for reconciliation of the conflict between the factions, battling for their respective arguments over same-sex love, were stopped in their tracks by the General Synod of the Church of England voting to move on to next business. The woolly ten commitments, or ideas of possible commitments, are thus deposited in the waste bin. However, an amendment calling for a new structure to protect the dedicated sensibilities of the the fundamentalist brigade was lost. A portent for the future as the Archbishop of the presses on with his fiction of unity within the Church of England and the Anglican Communion.<div><br></div><div>So, what now?</div><div><br></div><div>'A legally secure structural settlement, without theological compromise, is the only way forward, says CEEC’s John Dunnett.</div><div><br></div><div>The meeting of the General Synod of the Church of England concluded on Tuesday.</div><div><br></div><div>Commenting on the debate on the Living in Love and Faith (LLF) process, Revd Canon John Dunnett, National Director, Church of England Evangelical Council, CEEC, said: “The decision taken by General Synod to move to next business [before the end of the debate] is demonstrative of widespread dissatisfaction with how the bishops have been progressing the LLF process. The one thing that Synod could largely agree on was that neither side could support the proposals that would emanate from the motion, as tabled at Synod. We believe that GS2346, as presented at Synod, is riddled with confusion and ambiguity, contains proposals we could never support, and outlines inadequate structural provision.</div><div><br></div><div>“Significantly, the move to next business is also evidence that we cannot ‘square the circle’ in the debate, as currently framed. This issue is not adiaphora – we cannot agree to disagree.</div><div><br></div><div>“This is why we continue to call for a legal and structural settlement without theological compromise, which we believe is the only way forward. We will gladly work with Bishop Martyn Snow to explore this route further. Between now and July, we will be calling on churches and their leaders to articulate their support for this.</div><div><br></div><div>“Many feel that the fabric of the Church of England is tearing as a result of the Living in Love and Faith process and that structural differentiation is the only way of maintaining any degree of unity."'</div><div><br></div><div>What will be the architecture of a <i>legally secure structural settlement? </i>I believe we must wait and see what emerges before commenting.</div><div><br></div><div>The proponents of full inclusion also consider the disposal of the motion by General Synod helps their cause as it adds impetus and urgency to giving effect to earlier decisions by Synod relating to stand-alone services of blessing for individuals in same-sex marriages. I am not so sure. At some point there will need to be a change in Canon law that requires two-thirds majorities in all three houses of Synod. Will there be a trade-off? Agree the new structure the price for this being agreement to change Canon law? </div><div><br></div><div>It looks very messy and much may depend on the composition of the General Synod after the 2025 elections. Or will Parliament intervene?</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-65842141864079435322024-02-27T14:49:00.001+00:002024-02-27T14:49:42.168+00:00Part 246. Quotations (1)I concur with the sentiments expressed in the following quotations.<div><br></div><div><i>I prefer a Church which is bruised, hurting and dirty because it has been out on the streets, rather than a Church which is unhealthy from being confined and from clinging to its own security.</i></div><div><b>Pope Francis </b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div>We must talk about poverty, because people insulated by their own comfort lose sight of it.</div><div><b>Dorothy Day</b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><i>If we try and have a Christianity without social justice, we cut out the beautiful beating heart of Jesus and we are left with only a lifeless corpse of religion to drag around.</i></div><div><b>John Pavlovitz</b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div>The measure of a society in found in how they treat their weakest and most helpless citizens. </div><div><b>Jimmy Carter </b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><i>Any talk about God that fails to make God's liberation of the oppressed as its starting point is not Christian.</i></div><div><b>James Cone</b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div>When the Church hears the cry of the oppressed it cannot but denounce the social structures that give rise to and perpetuate the misery from which the cry arises.</div><div><b>Oscar Romero </b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><i><br></i></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-31950533994001617232024-02-25T12:44:00.003+00:002024-02-25T13:05:39.900+00:00Part 245. An interesting statement.The following is by <b>Jim Palmer</b>. It summarises (far better than I am able to) some key points of my current opinions. I do not concur with all the points he makes but I have included them so as not to impair the overall context.<div><br></div><div>10 things about Christianity that Jesus would not endorse if he had a say: </div><div><br></div><div>1. That his vision for a transformed society, got twisted into an afterlife fantasy about heaven.</div><div><br></div><div>2. That a religion was formed to worship his name, instead of a movement to advance his message.</div><div><br></div><div>3. That the gospel says his death solved the problem of humankind's separation from God, instead of accepting that his life revealed the truth that there is no separation from God.</div><div><br></div><div>4. That the religion bearing his name was conceived by the theories and doctrines of Paul, instead of the truth Jesus lived and demonstrated.</div><div><br></div><div>5. That he was said to exclusively be God in the flesh, putting his example out of reach, rather than teaching that we all share in the same spirit that empowered his character and life.</div><div><br></div><div>6. That the religion that claims his name, teaches that his wisdom and teachings are the only legitimate way to know truth and God.</div><div><br></div><div>7. The idea that humankind stands condemned before God and deserving of Divine wrath and eternal conscious judgement, requiring the death of Jesus to fix it.</div><div><br></div><div>8. That people are waiting on Jesus to return to save the world and end suffering, rather than taking responsibility for saving the world and solving suffering ourselves.</div><div><br></div><div>9. That people think there is magical potency in uttering the name of Jesus, rather than accessing our own natural powers and capabilities to effect change.</div><div><br></div><div>10. That people have come to associate Jesus with church, theology, politics and power, rather than courage, justice, humanity, beauty and love.</div><div><br></div><div><b>Jim Palmer </b></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-46246493406802627252024-02-24T12:42:00.001+00:002024-02-24T12:42:40.642+00:00Part 244. Social Justice Champions, The Salvation Army.I have been advised that:<div><br></div><div>"SJCs are not appointed as such, nor do they hold an official position within TSA. They're supporters who have indicated an interest in campaigning on a local or national issue. Anyone can sign up."<div><br></div><div>A few months ago a corps' officer informed me I had to be approved as a SJC by the corps Council. Ah well. </div><div><br></div><div>I surmise that an SJC may be assisted in the campaigning process by TSA but it would appear an individual may only act in a personal capacity, and not as a representative of TSA, when in communication with a councillor. MP etc.</div><div><br></div><div>I await clarification from TSA as to the accuracy of my surmise as well as a response to my query as to how TSA may respond to a public consultation by a public body within whose area there are a number of corps. </div><div><br></div><div>Kent has numerous corps within the county council's area. Many of the council's services impact on the very individuals the Army supports. The Army should be campaigning on behalf of <i>and </i>with those who would be affected by proposed policy and budgetary changes.<br><div><br><div><br></div></div></div></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-92157212674677114602024-02-21T18:39:00.001+00:002024-02-21T18:46:09.961+00:00Part 243. As Ollie said to Stan...Well here's another nice mess you've gotten me into. Yes, the Church of England is not only in a mess surrounding blessings of individuals in a same-sex marriage but also in a fine old shambles regarding safeguarding.<div><br></div><div>A damning independent report states the safeguarding process standard falls below that expected in secular organisations and urgent action is required to remedy the mess.</div><div><br></div><div>The report states safeguarding processes have been used in instances that have nothing to do with protecting children and vulnerable adults. Safeguarding has been 'weaponised" as a pretext for removing people regarded as a "nuisance".</div><div><br></div><div>Alice in Blunderland stuff.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-25948386504819863812024-02-20T00:59:00.000+00:002024-02-20T00:59:15.398+00:00Part 242. what a disgrace.The Church of England General Synod is to debate a motion on the Living in Love and Faith process. The waters have been muddied by a letter from the motion's mover, the Bishop of Leicester, addressed to all Synod members. <div><br></div><div>'I want to clarify the purpose of the motion we will be debating. The papers set out <b><u>a</u></b> set of commitments - they are intended as an illustration of the sort of commitments that <b><u>might</u> </b>form the basis of an agreement.'</div><div><br></div><div>In other words debate the outline of possible general principles rather than a detailed analysis of the words of specific proposals.</div><div><br></div><div>The letter continues:</div><div><br></div><div>'So the debate is about whether a set of commitments is a good approach, rather than whether you agree with the details of these particular commitments.'</div><div><br></div><div>What a continuing disgrace. Horse trading for stand-alone services for couples in same-sex marriages in return for which there will be structural change (separation) for those who dissent from the provision of said blessings.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-74525939780676816822024-02-18T14:19:00.001+00:002024-02-18T14:23:00.216+00:00Part 241. Snippets.If you need the Bible to love your neighbor, you'll never truly love them.<div><br></div><div>If you need the Bible to care for people, you'll never truly care for them.</div><div><br></div><div>If you need the Bible to be kind, gentle, and just, you'll never be truly kind, gentle, or just.</div><div><br></div><div>If you need the Bible to feed the hungry, stand in solidarity with the oppressed, and resist greed, you'll never truly feed, stand for, or resist anything.</div><div><br></div><div>If you need the Bible to do the right thing, to live generously, and to be humble and servant minded, you'll never truly do the right things and be the right person for the right reasons.</div><div><br></div><div>People who need the Bible often do so because the heart is missing. Living becomes a religious act, and being becomes a religious facade. Everything is to ultimately appease a rule, ritual, or religion. It bottom lines on self-righteousness, disguised as being spiritual.</div><div><br></div><div>Love is only love, right is only right, and goodness is only goodness, if it is compelled from the heart. </div><div><br></div><div>Grace is brave. Be brave. </div><div><b>Chris Kratzer</b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div>What the hell did you expect me to do? </div><div><br></div><div>You told me to love my neighbors, to model the life of Jesus. To be kind and considerate, and to stand up for the bullied.<br></div><div><br></div><div>You told me to love people, consider others as more important than myself. "Red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in His sight." We sang it together, pressing the volume pedal and leaning our hearts into the chorus.<br></div><div><br></div><div>You told me to love my enemies, to even do good to those who wish for bad things.</div><div><br></div><div>You told me to never "hate" anyone and to always find ways to encourage people. </div><div><br></div><div>You told me it's better to give than receive, to be last instead of first. </div><div><br></div><div>You told me that money doesn't bring happiness and can even lead to evil, but taking care of the needs of others brings great joy and life to the soul.<br></div><div><br></div><div>You told me that Jesus looks at what I do for the least-of-these as the true depth of my faith. </div><div>You told me to focus on my own sin instead of trying to police it in others. You told me to be accepting and forgiving.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I payed attention.<br></div><div>I took every lesson.</div><div>And I did what you told me.</div><div><br></div><div>But now, you call me a libtard. A queer-love</div><div>You call me "woke." A backslider.</div><div>You call me a heretic. A child of the devil.</div><div>You call me a false prophet. A reprobate leading people to gates of hell.</div><div>You call me soft. A snowflake. A socialist.</div><div><br></div><div>What the hell did you expect me to do?<br></div><div><br></div><div>You passed out the "WWJD" bracelets.<br></div><div>I took it to heart. </div><div><br></div><div>I thought you were serious, apparently not.<br></div><div>We were once friends. But now, the lines have been drawn. You hate nearly all the people I love. You stand against nearly all the things I stand for. I'm trying to see a way forward, but it's hard when I survey all the hurt, harm, and darkness that comes in the wake of your beliefs and presence. <br></div><div><br></div><div>What the hell did you expect me to do? <br></div><div><br></div><div>I believed it all the way. <br></div><div>I'm still believing it all the way.</div><div>Which leaves me wondering, what happened to you?</div><div>Grace is brave. Be brave.</div><div><b>Chris Kratzer</b></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-24819860665823110492024-02-16T22:45:00.005+00:002024-02-17T22:36:20.481+00:00Part 240. Whither The Salvation Army?An article by Peter Hobbs, a former Australian officer.<div><br></div><div>The UK Salvation Army event [ Belonging and Believing conference referred to in an earlier post] is a nice idea but the system is broken and the senior leaders don’t have the courage, the will, or the experience to be able to lead an organisation in the ways of Jesus. Those in leadership are picked because they maintain the status quo, status quo leadership is making sure rules and regs are followed and the idols maintained. Therefore the people in leadership have never had to think outside the box, they may be aware of theories, have some ideas, but unless they have actually modelled the reality of disciple making in community they won’t have the will to change the system. There are also very strong voices like Sentry that are bullying leaders to remain conservative, threatening pulling funding to Headquarters if the army changes. People are literally fighting with threats of pulling finances to maintain the status quo. The army rolls over for money, and knows it will die quickly if the money is pulled. So they bow to the bullies rather than stand up for what’s right. Many of the senior leaders have a conflict avoidance strategy so they let the loud voice run the show and keep their money. Selling their soul at the same time. There is no fighting for justice, it’s all words. </div><div><br></div><div>Cowards.</div><div><br></div><div>The Army leadership right up to Lyndon have shown they don’t have the will to change, and have made it clear they aren’t going to change. A recent fairwork commission the army spent $10,000 a day on the best barristers to effectively fight to keep the status quo on the position a Salvation Army Officer is not an employee. Therefore not protected under employee law and have no rights like an employee. Meaning they aggressively fought to be able to keep on treating officers anyway they like and keep using the fear method of behave or we will move or dismiss you as a weapon. $10,000 a day to keep this unjust system in play. They have no desire to serve suffering humanity and treat people with human dignity, not even their own, their officers or soldiers. They are in no position to change and they literally have no clue how to change. The movement William Booth started is dead and buried. </div><div><br></div><div>The other problem is all those who have tried to change have left. All the amazing leaders left years ago. There are plenty of Salvationists who want change but the system simply won’t allow for it or create space for it. It’s all talk. It’s not going to change. </div><div><br></div><div>The way forward is to take the example of Jesus, stay with the people of peace and pioneer a brand new movement wherever life happens. I have not looked back. It’s sad that people still have hope that The Army is going to change. It is current leadership right up to Lyndon who have enabled dysfunction and chosen to put the idols and dogma first and people last that have created the demise of this amazing organisation. </div><div><br></div><div>But this is the way. This is what Jesus modelled. For his disciples to be thrust out into the mission field. So we can reach all cultures not just those who love an outdated 19th century irrelevant religious culture. </div><div><br></div><div>This is the way. Death of the Army leads to resurrection of Jesus!</div><div><br></div><div><b>Additional comment from Peter.</b></div><div><br></div><div>I've been to youth forums, change conferences, and have been part of the change, pioneering brand-new Salvation Army communities for 40 years. Leaders talk and talk, then remain in an appointment for a year or two, then move on, and nothing happens. It’s spin to feed their narcissistic supply and make them look good so they can get promoted in the system. The talk always leads to nothing because the system is too inflexible to bring real reform.</div><div><br></div><div>My team worked with the territory to create a youth and children’s trauma-informed practice framework, working with our trained and proven family therapist from the Bellarine Community. Tens of thousands of dollars spent, then leaders change and the report is put on a shelf. The leaders that implemented the reform got disillusioned and left the army. Nothing happened with the report and over $80,000 wasted… It’s pure incompetence and blatant disregard of people and their investment in the mission. Our family therapist refused to work with the organisation after that. </div><div><br></div><div>The idol of the soldier's covenant holds the army back, and they fight to keep it as it is. No leaders have the will to change or the knowledge of how to update it. When suggestions are made and implemented from officers on the ground, the senior leaders get their noses out of joint because the narcissistic supply is taken away from them. They then punish the leaders beneath them for thinking and innovating. It’s pathetic, it’s weak, and absolutely messed up. Narcissism is rife, nepotism is also rife, and there is zero accountability for senior leaders' decisions because they make decisions about officers in the secret, faceless Gestapo-style Officer Review board. Lives of officers are managed by people who don’t have good interpersonal people skills and, regretfully, are poor decision-makers, and what’s worst is they are usually their “friends” or peers. It’s just awful.</div><div><br></div><div>An Army of dysfunction, abuse, and self-obsession. It’s too toxic to change. I’d suggest any new cadet to get out while they can. But then there are no cadets anyway… senior leadership still doesn’t see there’s a problem… it’s embarrassing and an absolute disgrace to the name of Jesus. In fact, it’s Idolatry and taking the Lord's name in vain. I’m glad God is working to create brand-new organic expressions outside the army.</div><div><br></div><div>This is the way.</div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-84337534791605159602024-02-15T20:03:00.002+00:002024-02-16T17:22:10.485+00:00Part 239. Two key events.The General Synod of the Church of England meets at the end of February. The agenda includes an item on Safeguarding, a contentious issue as the current arrangements are not working. The Synod will be considering proposals for the next steps in the Living in Love and Faith saga. The talk is of 'reconciliation', but the proposals are a capitulation to the demands of Conservative Evangelicals and their Anglo-Catholic allies and another kick in the teeth for LBGTQ communities, unless they are rejected or significantly amended.<div><br></div><div>The first weekend in March sees The Salvation Army holding a conference entitled 'Belonging and Believing'. The results of an extensive survey of opinion within the United Kingdom & Ireland Territory will be published at the conference. A report from the conference will be presented to divisional and national leaderships for them to decide what to recommend to the top brass. It is to be hoped the conference and report focus on how to stop and reverse the downward march in membership, how to recruit many more officers and how to achieve full inclusion.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-29917952946439756222024-02-14T18:49:00.003+00:002024-02-15T13:17:13.955+00:00Part 238. Towards full inclusion?A senior officer at the territorial headquarters posted on a Facebook page that The Salvation Army in the United Kingdom & Ireland Territory is very much influenced by the charismatic and conservative evangelical wings of the Church of England. Given the current shenanigans in the Church of England (and also in the Anglican Communion) on inclusion issues this does not bode well for any significant change in the stance of the Army on LBGTQ+ inclusion. <div><br></div><div>However, some are of the opinion that the following statements may be indicative of change. </div><div><br></div><div><i>Accountability and tranparency must be at the centre of our service and our leadership. In the world in which we live, and across the Army, the issues of culture and the way we do things must surrender to God’s way for his followers, especially those he has called to lead the Army and its people.</i></div><div><b>General Lyndon Buckingham.</b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div>The question that shouts out is: how do we define God's way? A theological minefield. The General is either signalling no change from the fundamentalist evangelical approach, or it is the precursor to a significant shift to a progressive stance. Either stance will be welcomed by some within the Army.</div><div><br></div><div><i>We both feel strongly about equality, which we hope is demonstrated by our leadership style. Equality, diversity and inclusion are very important to us both.This needs to be preached and lived out.</i></div><div><b>UK & I Territorial Leaders Jenine and Paul Main </b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div>Is this an indication that fundamental change is afoot? One would like to think so, but I have my doubts. There may be tinkering at the edges. </div><div><br></div><div>The <i>Belonging and Believing</i> conference in early March may test the waters as to the extent of demand for change. A poor showing by the proponents of inclusion will be seized on by its opponents as a justification for no change. In my opinion that would be a disaster, not only for LBGTQ+ individuals, but also for the Army's long-term survival in the UK. </div><div><br></div><div>Edit. </div><div><br></div><div>It has been suggested that the General's statement (a stand-alone item on his Facebook page) concerns financial administration and management of resources being operated in a unified way across the Army. I agree it is a plausible interpretation. The statement ironically is opaque.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761106988716308474.post-72547393362969424422024-02-12T22:08:00.003+00:002024-02-13T10:02:13.399+00:00Part 237. Campaigning: proposal to The Salvation Army The Salvation Army's ability to campaign for social justice is limited by resource constraints. This is the case particularly in regard to campaigning below national level. Organisations responsible for social care, health, education, housing, transport do not have boundaries contiguous with corps areas. Thus campaigning for changes in the policies of a county council will need to involve a number of corps. Likewise with health trusts and housing associations. <div><br></div><div>Given the resource limitations the Army has currently, I am proposing volunteer Social Justice Champions (or should it be social justice champions) form a virtual network to consider issues that arise which may impact on individuals in more than one corps area of influence. To achieve this a number of matters require resolution.</div><div><br></div><div>* What is the status of SJCs? Are they appointed by Corps or are they simply a generic group of individuals with no specific/authorised status?</div><div><br></div><div>* What are the reporting and control mechanisms, both for individual SJCs and when acting collectively?</div><div><br></div><div>These are important points for both individuals and any network. When contacting organisations there is a need for both The Salvation Army and the organisation being contacted to understand SJCs are expressing views officially endorsed by the Army.</div><div><br></div><div>Clearly there is much more to be considered.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>Kent Community Activisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13030538385656131722noreply@blogger.com0