Monday 18 March 2024

Part 261. A 'must read' Jim Palmer article. .

 I concur with all this. Article byJim PALMER.

It’s unfortunate for all those years as a pastor that I cheapened Jesus by making him into supernatural being who would save the world, and not as a courageous and revolutionary human person who came to love it. I can’t relate to the religious Jesus as a sinless saint, but I feel like I understand the Jesus who found deep peace within himself, but could also became unhinged by the abuses of religion. 

With that in mind, here are 10 things about Christianity that Jesus would not endorse if he had a say: 

1. That his vision for a transformed society, got twisted into an afterlife fantasy about heaven.

2. That a religion was formed to worship his name, instead of a movement to advance his message.

3. That the gospel says his death solved the problem of humankind's separation from God, instead of accepting that his life revealed the truth that there is no separation from God.

4. That the religion bearing his name was conceived by the theories and doctrines of Paul, instead of the truth Jesus lived and demonstrated.

5. That he was said to exclusively be God in the flesh, putting his example out of reach, rather than teaching that we all share in the same spirit that empowered his character and life.

6. That the religion that claims his name, teaches that his wisdom and teachings are the only legitimate way to know truth and God.

7. The idea that humankind stands condemned before God and deserving of Divine wrath and eternal conscious judgement, requiring the death of Jesus to fix it.

8. That people are waiting on Jesus to return to save the world and end suffering, rather than taking responsibility for saving the world and solving suffering ourselves.

9. That people think there is magical potency in uttering the name of Jesus, rather than accessing our own natural powers and capabilities to effect change.

10. That people have come to associate Jesus with church, theology, politics and power, rather than courage, justice, humanity, beauty and love.

Jim Palmer

Part 260. My theological position: a summary. Section Three

Three quotations: 

Our religion should be a sincere search for God within us, a search that will bring forth fruits of love, justice and truth.
Oscar Romeo

God is a verb that invites us to live, to love and to be.
John Shelby Spong 

I understand that the ultimate reality that the word  'God' indicates is woven into the fabric of all existence and in the ground of my being.
Jim Palmer 

God is love. The ministry of Jesus is encapsulated in the words: love God, love others. Reports of the ministry of Jesus contained in the synoptic gospels indicate the challenge Jesus engaged in against the prevailing religious, political and economic systems.  His support for the poor,  the disadvantaged, the marginalised and the discriminated against comes through loud and clear.

When reading the synoptic gospels we must consider it in the context of the times and also the motivation of the authors which is a factor in determining content.

We have to understand the concepts and principles articulated in the synoptic gospels and apply them through the lens of love to our current context. That is the challenge for progressive christianity as it seeks to give effect to love, justice and truth for all.


Friday 15 March 2024

Part 259. My theological position: a summary. Section Two

Who or what is God? Does God exist?  Theories as to the existence and nature of God are simply just that, theories. It is all conjecture and ultimately a matter of personal faith. Hebrews 11:1 encapsulates it well:

Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see.

John Shelby Spong commented on the nature of God thus:

God is not a noun, that demands to be described, God is a verb that invites us to love, to live, to be.

God is a human construct, a concept symbolising that which we cannot understand, a concept commandeered for different purposes throughout history.  To my mind, for followers of Jesus God's being and purpose is love for humanity, for freedom, inclusion, equity, for the poor, marginalised and discriminated against.

An associated matter concerns prayer.  I question the idea that God listens to and responds to prayer and the value of intercessionary prayer. I query the motives of individuals who, to justify their actions, assert they are in response to the Holy Spirit. 

We may in faith believe in the efficacy of prayer, the leading of the Holy Spirit but let us not anthropomorphise God. God is beyond description.


Part 258. My theological position: a summary. Section One.

As I have mused on theological matters in this blog some of my beliefs have developed, others have stayed as they were whilst yet others have been rejected. It is all personal opinion, though I trust I have taken counsel from others far more experienced and knowledgeable in theology than I can ever hope to be. I eschew flowery and opaque language. Jargon leaves me cold. Keep it simple but not simplistic.

So what is my theological stance?  

I let go of the notion that the Bible is a divine product. I learned that it is a human cultural product, the product of two ancient communities, biblical Israel and early Christianity. As such, it contained their understandings and affirmations, statements not coming directly or somewhat directly from God.....I realised that whatever "divine revelation" and the "inspiration  of the Bible" meant (if they meant anything, they did not mean that the Bible was a divine product with divine authority.
Marcus Borg 

The above may be read in conjunction with the following statement by Borg.

Properly understood the Bible is a potential ally to the progressive Christian passion for transformation of ourselves and the world.  It is our great heritage.  Along with Jesus, to whom it is subordinate, it is our greatest treasure.

What is properly understood? How do we understand the meaning of words? How do we develop understanding of the message words are intended to convey?  How do we interpret the bible in our context? The ideas of Jacques Derrida and other postmodernists inform us that the meaning of literature is not determined by the author but by our own understanding.  A sensible approach. How are we to know what the authors of the Bible intended? Each generation brings its own interpretation to bear on scripture. In this context I proffer this gem.

My point is not that those ancient people told literal stories and we are not smart enough to take them symbolically, but that they told them symbolically and we are now dumb enough to take them literally.
John Dominic Crossan

So, should we take the synoptic gospels stories about Jesus literally or symbolically and if the latter what do they symbolise? Perhaps that God is love expressed symbolically in human form in Jesus.












Tuesday 12 March 2024

Part 257. More quotations

The Kingdom of God is not a matter of getting individuals to heaven, but of transforming the life on earth into the harmony of heaven. 
Walter Rauschenbusch 

Your 'yes' to God  requires your 'no' to all injustice, to all evil, to all lies.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer 

We cannot profess our solidarity with those who are oppressed when we are unwilling to confront the oppressor.
Henri Nouwen

How can we be the church of Jesus unless we reflect the ministry of Jesus?  Is the church a radical incarnation of the ministry of Jesus or a private social club?
Yvette Flunder

The prophetic tasks of the Church are to tell the truth in a society that lives and illusion, grieve in a society that practices denial, and express hope in a society that lives in despair.
Walter Brueggemann 



Sunday 10 March 2024

Part 256. Theology of Social Justice

A political ecclesiology organising then, begins with the Spirit's call to Christian churches to build relationships of liberation and love, and this mission is concretizing in the experience of counterpublic churches, building relational power for political, economic and racial justice.
Aaron Stauffer.  

Phew!. Fortunately Kissing Fish Book Facebook page has provided an explanation in plain English.

"Aaron Stauffer's work encapsulates a profound perspective on the role of Christian churches in societal transformation. It suggests that a political ecclesiology, or the understanding of the church's role in political engagement, commences with the Spirit's call to establish relationships rooted in liberation and love. This call extends beyond mere rhetoric, finding concrete expression in the lived experiences of counterpublic churches. 

In the context of counterpublic churches, the mission takes shape, and these faith communities become agents of change. They actively contribute to building relational power, not only within their congregations but also in the broader social landscape. The objective is clear: to address pressing issues of political, economic, and racial justice.

Stauffer invites contemplation on the dynamic interplay between spirituality and social action. He challenges traditional notions of the church as a passive  observer, urging a more active and engaged role in the pursuit of justice. The transformative journey outlined in his work beckons believers to heed the Spirit's call, actively participate in the mission of liberation and love, and contribute to the collective effort for a more just and equitable society."

I concur with Aaron Stauffer's statement but would add 'and other forms of discrimination'  after 'racial justice'.




Thursday 7 March 2024

Part 255. Theologians and commentators

On my Facebook page: John Hopkinson Theology Page I  have posted a cartoon that has the simple message that Christian faith is about loving God and loving neighbours. Simple that is until the churches and theologians came along to complicate matters.  

Of course the cartoonist has a point, but it would be wrong to be overly critical of  theologians who proffer their insights into the meaning and application of the two Great Commandments set out by Jesus in the synoptic gospels. 

My thinking and hence my faith has been influenced by a number of commentators in the fields of philosophy, politics, law, economics and theology. It is a long held view of mine that we cannot understand faith in a vacuum,  we must consider faith, particularly its application, in the context of the society in which we live. The same may be said of the study of most disciplines: law, economics, politics, sociology etc.

So, who have been major influences in my faith journey? Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Walter Brueggemann, Kenneth Galbraith, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Bernice King, Jacques Derrida, Richard Rohr, Jim Palmer, Leonardo Boff, Oscar Romero, Gustavo Gutierrez, Desmond Tutu, Martin Luther King Jnr, Don Cupitt, David Hayward, John Pavlovitz, John Robinson, Marcus Borg, Richard Holloway and Rowan Williams. 

So from all this my faith comes down to: follow the two Great Commandents,  campaign for social justice for the poor, marginalised and discriminated against, reject the notion of a metaphysical God.






Tuesday 5 March 2024

Part 254. KCC budget cuts

Central goverment has put a financial squeeze on local authorities leaving the latter to receive the odium for cuts they make to achieve balanced budgets. Decisions as to where councils cut their budgets is left to local discretion. Statutory services have to be maintained and any ring-fenced resources must be applied in keeping with the purpose of the provision.

Clearly difficult and unpopular decisions have to be taken by the politicians in local government. 

In Kent closure of some Surestart centres, dismembering youth services, funding for homelessness charities and reduction in support funding for disabled people are all in the pipeline. One can have some sympathy for the dilemma facing the policians.

But where is the concerted opposition of churches to these attacks on the vulnerable in our society?  Where are campaigns by the churches, not only at local level but also at national level? Many local councils are in a similar plight to Kent.  The blame rests squarely on the shoulders of The Treasury and ministers. 

For individuals affected by cuts it may then be the case that they turn to the already overstretched voluntary sector, including churches.

Sunday 3 March 2024

Part 253. Quotations (2)

Jesus called people to follow him in a way of living.  He does not require his followers to accept a catalogue of religious beliefs or adopt a set of spiritual practices.  Rather, he offered them a new way to live their daily lives. As a result, the earliest members of the Jesus movement were known as followers of the way.
Kurt Struckmeyer

God is calling the Church to something new, but we hold things back when we do things according to tradition as opposed to partnering with God in the new way.
Doug Addison 

The Church is not memories; we are not just looking in a rear-view mirror. The Church is moving forward and needs new perspectives.
Oscar Romero 

Never be afraid to raise your voice for honesty, truth and compassion against injustice and tyranny and greed.
William Faulkner

Being human, even just a poor worker, is being made in the image of God.  That is not communism or subversion.  It is the word of God that enlightens everyone.
Oscar Romero 

Always be sure that you struggle with Christian weapons.  Never succumb to the temptation of becoming bitter. As you press on for justice, be sure you move with justice and discipline, using only the weapon of love.
Martin Luther King Jnr 

What is needed is a realisation that power without love is reckless and abusive, and that love without power is sentimental and anemic.  Power at its best is love implementing the demands of justice  and justice at its best is love correcting everything that stands against love.
Martin Luther King Jnr 

Saturday 2 March 2024

Part 252.. On the cusp of change?

For those of a progressive disposition the proceedings on Saturday 2nd March at The Salvation Army Belonging and Believing  conference have gone well, if one believes the feedback accurately reflects the substance and tone of presentations and discussions.

The Territorial Leaders  have said: 

Be assured we are not talking about changing our vision of fullness of life for all with Jesus, or our mission - to share the good news, to serve others without discrimination, to nurture disciples of Jesus, to care for creation, to seek justice and Reconciliation - or our values of passion, compassion,  respect, mutual accountability, boldness and integrity,  or our calling to follow Jesus. Rather  we are talking about how we live this out together through discipleship that is radical and inclusive.

Radical and inclusive.

A question posed at the conference:

How can the UKI Territory shape discipleship that is exciting with a radical vision of belonging  committing, and serving the Kingdom of God through The Salvation Army?

That word radical again. 

The Membership Working Party will be taking on board the views expressed at the conference, together with the results of the Belonging and Believing Survey, and many other expressions of opinion. The next step will be for the Working Party  to make recommendations to Territorial leaders.  It is to be hoped that in the interests of transparency the recommendations and the reasoning behind them are placed in the public domain.

Let us hope the recommendations are radical and inclusive, not a damp squib.

Friday 1 March 2024

Part 251. Belonging and Believing:The Big Conversation

This weekend The Salvation Army is holding a conference at Warwick University to consider inter alia the results of a survey that asked what it means to belong and believe as members or supporters of the Army and what needs to change. The event is fully subscribed.

A large section of this week's Salvationist is taken up with information concerning the event and issues raised by the survey.

What is striking in the Salvationist articles is the strength of support for LBGTQ+ inclusion. This has given great encouragement to those within the Army who have long campaigned for full inclusion.

Will the discussions at the conference reinforce the quest for full inclusion or will conservative fundamentalist evangelicals hold sway? In some ways the arguments reflect the current division within the Church of England.

The Membership Working Party will take on board the results of the survey, what is said at the conference,  as well many other representations it has received, and then draw up its recommendations to be put to the territorial leadership this summer. Will the recommendations and the reasoning behind them be in the public domain? They should be as the need for accountability and tranparency has been promoted by the General. 

TSA is an international organisation. Any move towards full inclusion in the United Kingdom and Ireland Territory will be viewed unfavourably in many Salvationists in the USA and West Africa. However doing what is right for the UK&I Territory should be implemented for that territory alone.


Part 250. Down on the estate (2)

Please read in conjunction with Part 249.

There are over 850 significant social housing estates in England in which the Church of England is being instructed by General Synod to engage by planting churches and seeking new church leaders (including ordinands). Frankly I think this in a mission impossible simply on the basis of sheer size of the task.

One can understand why the CofE wishes to engage in deprived areas. The history of the CofE is one of loss to Methodist and Salvation Army churches.  The two latter denominations are also in decline and looking to re-engage in such areas. The fear is that there will be competition rather than collaborative or partnership working.  

Successful sustainable community engagement in areas of deprivation, that includes individuals who are destitute, are notoriously difficult to achieve.  The last thing people want or need is outsider religious do-gooders preaching at them. Building successful community engagement is a very slow process. Trust is only gained over a long period. It is essential that any community group is of the community, with the community and for the community. 

In areas of multiple deprivation the church must be seen to be campaigning for change, campaigning that has to be led from within the community. Control must rest with a community group, not outsiders whether as individuals or as representatives of a church.  

Nowhere in the General Synod deliberations is there so much as a passing reference to Liberation Theology. The principles of LT are applicable to church engagement in areas of deprivation, indeed are essential.  The church, of whatever denomination, is not there only to apply bandages to the wounded but to engage with communities for them to campaign for structural change.

It is a huge undertaking the CofE is embarked on. To achieve its target will require a massive commitment of human and financial resources.  It would have been preferable to set a much lower initial target and then build on the experience gained.








Thursday 29 February 2024

Part 249. Down on the estate (1)

An excellent initiative in many respects but i have some reservations. Below is the text of a Church of England press release.

General Synod

General Synod calls for redoubling of efforts to create new churches on estates
26/02/2024

Estate churches thanked by Bishop for 'utterly beautiful' work in face of challenges including poverty and rising levels of destitution

The Church of England needs many more leaders from working class backgrounds and deprived communities, the General Synod has heard, in a debate where members voted to redouble efforts to establish churches on housing estates.

The Synod re-committed the Church of England to setting up a church on every significant social housing estate, five years on from first giving its backing to this goal.

Members also backed moves to double the number of young active Christians on housing estates and ensure that young people from estates and low-income communities are trained as children’s and young people’s leaders among other forms of ministry.

The Bishop of Blackburn, Philip North, who introduced the debate, called on the Church of England to act now to reverse the "slow erosion" of Christian life on estates.

Dioceses and Theological Education institutions (TEIs) – where people are trained for ordained ministry - should be encouraged to consider more ways of training lay and ordained leaders from estates and deprived communities, he said.

“Estates churches and the wider church desperately need leaders called from our estates and deprived communities,” he said.

He added: “I’m convinced that there is an underground army of evangelists and prophets out there which a culturally middle class church is simply missing.”

The Synod also backed a call for the Church of England to address financial inequalities between dioceses.

Bishop Philip said the wealth disparities between dioceses are a "scandal" that "we cannot allow to endure".

He told Synod members that there have been "many advances" since the General Synod gave its backing five years ago for the drive to set up a church on every significant social housing estates in the country.

New estate churches have been planted by all Anglican traditions, he said, and a number of dioceses, such as Southwark, Norwich, London and Southwell and Nottingham have appointed advisers.

He added that around £100 million of Lowest Income Communities Funding and £40 million in Strategic Development Funding has been allocated to estates or economically deprived communities.

But he said there had also been "significant" setbacks including the impact of the pandemic.

At least 10 more estates churches have closed in the past five years, most with no plan for replanting and there are still at least 850 significant estates that are not served by a Christian community, he said.

Bishop Philip said the Synod had a chance to acknowledge and thank a "remarkable" group of lay people and priests who minister on estates.

He said the work on estates churches had been "utterly beautiful" in the face of multiple challenges including the pandemic and increasing levels of poverty and destitution.

The motion
Synod members gave their unanimous backing to the following Estates Evangelism motion (364 votes for, none against and no abstentions):

This Synod:

*dedicate itself afresh to the goal of achieving a loving, serving and worshipping Christian community on every significant social housing estate to mark the fifth anniversary of Synod Motion GS2122

*commend the work of all who minister on our estates and gives thanks for those Dioceses who have responded positively to the 2019 Motion

*call on all Dioceses to include in their strategic mission and ministry plans the goal of planting and renewing churches on, and/or doubling the number of young active disciples in social housing estates/other economically marginalised communities

*call on the whole church to address as a matter of urgency the structural and financial injustices that prevent flourishing and sustainable worshipping communities on every estate (for example, the financial inequalities between dioceses and the distribution of LInC Funding)

*commit itself to taking the necessary steps to raise up and support a new generation of lay and ordained leaders from estates and working class backgrounds (by for example addressing the recommendations of the Ministry Council’s Report ‘Let Justice Roll Down.’) at all levels in the church including a commitment to invest creatively in local and grassroots forms of ministry and leadership training.

*Request the Estates Evangelism Task Group to work alongside diocesan vocations advisers, the 30,000 Project and other related bodies to ensure that priority is given to the formation of young people from estates and low-income communities to serve as children’s and young people’s leaders, as well as in other forms of Christian ministry.

End of press release. My comments will be in the next post.

Part 248. Apologies but no resignations.

In Part 243. As Ollie said to Stan mention is made of the independent report (Wilkinson Report) into the shambles that is the Church of England's safeguarding policies and procedures. It is a damning report.

 General Synod agreed that as a matter of priority the report be sent to committees to consider and make recommendations for change. Profuse apologies offered to victims of abuse and members of the then Independent Safeguarding Board. 

However no resignations from anyone with responsibility for this abject failure to protect the vulnerable. Heads should have rolled.

Part 247. The shambles continues

The paper and proposals for reconciliation of the conflict between the factions, battling for their respective arguments over same-sex love, were stopped in their tracks by the General Synod of the Church of England voting to move on to next business.  The woolly ten commitments, or ideas of possible commitments, are thus deposited in the waste bin. However, an amendment calling for a new structure to protect the dedicated sensibilities of the the fundamentalist brigade was lost. A portent for the future as the Archbishop of the presses on with his fiction of unity within the Church of England and the Anglican Communion.

So, what now?

'A legally secure structural settlement, without theological compromise, is the only way forward, says CEEC’s John Dunnett.

The meeting of the General Synod of the Church of England concluded on Tuesday.

Commenting on the debate on the Living in Love and Faith (LLF) process, Revd Canon John Dunnett, National Director, Church of England Evangelical Council, CEEC, said: “The decision taken by General Synod to move to next business [before the end of the debate] is demonstrative of widespread dissatisfaction with how the bishops have been progressing the LLF process. The one thing that Synod could largely agree on was that neither side could support the proposals that would emanate from the motion, as tabled at Synod. We believe that GS2346, as presented at Synod, is riddled with confusion and ambiguity, contains proposals we could never support, and outlines inadequate structural provision.

“Significantly, the move to next business is also evidence that we cannot ‘square the circle’ in the debate, as currently framed. This issue is not adiaphora – we cannot agree to disagree.

“This is why we continue to call for a legal and structural settlement without theological compromise, which we believe is the only way forward. We will gladly work with Bishop Martyn Snow to explore this route further. Between now and July, we will be calling on churches and their leaders to articulate their support for this.

“Many feel that the fabric of the Church of England is tearing as a result of the Living in Love and Faith process and that structural differentiation is the only way of maintaining any degree of unity."'

What will be the architecture of a legally secure structural settlement?  I believe we must wait and see what emerges before commenting.

The proponents of full inclusion also consider the disposal of the motion by General Synod helps their cause as it adds impetus and urgency to giving effect to earlier decisions by Synod relating to stand-alone services of blessing for individuals in same-sex marriages. I am not so sure. At some point there will need to be a change in Canon law that requires two-thirds majorities in all three houses of Synod. Will there be a trade-off? Agree the new structure the price for this being agreement to change Canon law?  

It looks very messy and much may depend on the composition of the General Synod after the 2025 elections. Or will Parliament intervene?


Tuesday 27 February 2024

Part 246. Quotations (1)

I concur with the sentiments expressed in the following quotations.

I prefer a Church which is bruised, hurting and dirty because it has been out on the streets, rather than a Church which is unhealthy from being confined and from clinging to its own security.
Pope Francis 

We must talk about poverty, because people insulated by their own comfort lose sight of it.
Dorothy Day

If we try and have a Christianity without social justice, we cut out the beautiful beating heart of Jesus and we are left with only a lifeless corpse of religion to drag around.
John Pavlovitz

The measure of a society in found in how they treat their weakest and most helpless citizens. 
Jimmy Carter 

Any talk about God that fails to make God's liberation of the oppressed as its starting point is not Christian.
James Cone

When the Church hears the cry of the oppressed it cannot but denounce the social structures that give rise to and perpetuate the misery from which the cry arises.
Oscar Romero 



Sunday 25 February 2024

Part 245. An interesting statement.

The following is by Jim Palmer. It summarises (far better than I am able to) some key points of my current opinions.  I do not concur with all the points he makes but I have included them so as not to impair the overall context.

10 things about Christianity that Jesus would not endorse if he had a say: 

1. That his vision for a transformed society, got twisted into an afterlife fantasy about heaven.

2. That a religion was formed to worship his name, instead of a movement to advance his message.

3. That the gospel says his death solved the problem of humankind's separation from God, instead of accepting that his life revealed the truth that there is no separation from God.

4. That the religion bearing his name was conceived by the theories and doctrines of Paul, instead of the truth Jesus lived and demonstrated.

5. That he was said to exclusively be God in the flesh, putting his example out of reach, rather than teaching that we all share in the same spirit that empowered his character and life.

6. That the religion that claims his name, teaches that his wisdom and teachings are the only legitimate way to know truth and God.

7. The idea that humankind stands condemned before God and deserving of Divine wrath and eternal conscious judgement, requiring the death of Jesus to fix it.

8. That people are waiting on Jesus to return to save the world and end suffering, rather than taking responsibility for saving the world and solving suffering ourselves.

9. That people think there is magical potency in uttering the name of Jesus, rather than accessing our own natural powers and capabilities to effect change.

10. That people have come to associate Jesus with church, theology, politics and power, rather than courage, justice, humanity, beauty and love.

Jim Palmer 

Saturday 24 February 2024

Part 244. Social Justice Champions, The Salvation Army.

I have been advised that:

"SJCs are not appointed as such, nor do they hold an official position within TSA. They're supporters who have indicated an interest in campaigning on a local or national issue. Anyone can sign up."

A few months ago a corps' officer informed me I had to be approved as a SJC by the corps Council. Ah well.  

I surmise that an SJC may be assisted in the campaigning process by TSA but it would appear an individual may only act in a personal capacity, and not as a representative of TSA, when in communication with a councillor. MP etc.

I await clarification from TSA  as to the accuracy of my surmise as well as a response to my query as to how TSA may respond to a public consultation by a public body within whose area there are a number of corps. 

Kent has numerous corps within the county council's area. Many of the council's services impact on the very individuals the Army supports. The Army should be campaigning on behalf of and with those who would be affected by proposed policy and budgetary changes.


Wednesday 21 February 2024

Part 243. As Ollie said to Stan...

Well here's another nice mess you've gotten me into. Yes, the Church of England is not only in a mess surrounding blessings of individuals in a same-sex marriage but also in  a fine old shambles regarding safeguarding.

A damning independent report states the safeguarding process standard falls below that expected in secular organisations and urgent action is required to remedy the mess.

The report states safeguarding processes have been used in instances that have nothing to do with protecting children and vulnerable adults. Safeguarding has been 'weaponised" as a pretext for removing people regarded as a "nuisance".

Alice in Blunderland stuff.


Tuesday 20 February 2024

Part 242. what a disgrace.

The Church of England General Synod is to debate a motion on the Living in Love and Faith process.  The waters have been muddied by a letter from the motion's mover, the Bishop of Leicester, addressed to all Synod members. 

'I want to clarify the purpose of the motion we will be debating.  The papers set out a set of commitments - they are intended as an illustration of the sort of commitments that might form the basis of an agreement.'

In other words debate the outline of possible general principles rather than a detailed analysis of the words of specific proposals.

The letter continues:

'So the debate is about whether a set of commitments is a good approach, rather than whether you agree with the details of these particular commitments.'

What a continuing disgrace. Horse trading for stand-alone services for couples in same-sex marriages in return for which there will be structural change (separation) for those who dissent from the provision of said blessings.


Sunday 18 February 2024

Part 241. Snippets.

If you need the Bible to love your neighbor, you'll never truly love them.

If you need the Bible to care for people, you'll never truly care for them.

If you need the Bible to be kind, gentle, and just, you'll never be truly kind, gentle, or just.

If you need the Bible to feed the hungry, stand in solidarity with the oppressed, and resist greed, you'll never truly feed, stand for, or resist anything.

If you need the Bible to do the right thing, to live generously, and to be humble and servant minded, you'll never truly do the right things and be the right person for the right reasons.

People who need the Bible often do so because the heart is missing. Living becomes a religious act, and being becomes a religious facade. Everything is to ultimately appease a rule, ritual, or religion. It bottom lines on self-righteousness, disguised as being spiritual.

Love is only love, right is only right, and goodness is only goodness, if it is compelled from the heart. 

Grace is brave. Be brave.  
Chris Kratzer


What the hell did you expect me to do?  

You told me to love my neighbors, to model the life of Jesus. To be kind and considerate, and to stand up for the bullied.

You told me to love people, consider others as more important than myself. "Red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in His sight." We sang it together, pressing the volume pedal and leaning our hearts into the chorus.

You told me to love my enemies, to even do good to those who wish for bad things.

You told me to never "hate" anyone and to always find ways to encourage people. 

You told me it's better to give than receive, to be last instead of first. 

You told me that money doesn't bring happiness and can even lead to evil, but taking care of the needs of others brings great joy and life to the soul.

You told me that Jesus looks at what I do for the least-of-these as the true depth of my faith. 
You told me to focus on my own sin instead of trying to police it in others. You told me to be accepting and forgiving.

I payed attention.
I took every lesson.
And I did what you told me.

But now, you call me a libtard. A queer-love
You call me "woke." A backslider.
You call me a heretic. A child of the devil.
You call me a false prophet. A reprobate leading people to gates of hell.
You call me soft. A snowflake. A socialist.

What the hell did you expect me to do?

You passed out the "WWJD" bracelets.
I took it to heart. 

I thought you were serious, apparently not.
We were once friends. But now, the lines have been drawn. You hate nearly all the people I love. You stand against nearly all the things I stand for. I'm trying to see a way forward, but it's hard when I survey all the hurt, harm, and darkness that comes in the wake of your beliefs and presence.  

What the hell did you expect me to do? 

I believed it all the way. 
I'm still believing it all the way.
Which leaves me wondering, what happened to you?
Grace is brave. Be brave.
Chris Kratzer

Friday 16 February 2024

Part 240. Whither The Salvation Army?

An article by Peter Hobbs, a former Australian officer.

The UK Salvation Army event [ Belonging and Believing conference referred to in an earlier post] is a nice idea but the system is broken and the senior leaders don’t have the courage, the will, or the experience to be able to lead an organisation in the ways of Jesus. Those in leadership are picked because they maintain the status quo, status quo leadership is making sure rules and regs are followed and the idols maintained. Therefore the people in leadership have never had to think outside the box, they may be aware of theories, have some ideas, but unless they have actually modelled the reality of disciple making in community they won’t have the will to change the system. There are also very strong voices like Sentry that are bullying leaders to remain conservative, threatening pulling funding to Headquarters if the army changes. People are literally fighting with threats of pulling finances to maintain the status quo. The army rolls over for money, and knows it will die quickly if the money is pulled. So they bow to the bullies rather than stand up for what’s right. Many of the senior leaders have a conflict avoidance strategy so they let the loud voice run the show and keep their money. Selling their soul at the same time. There is no fighting for justice, it’s all words. 

Cowards.

The Army leadership right up to Lyndon have shown they don’t have the will to change, and have made it clear they aren’t going to change. A recent fairwork commission the army spent $10,000 a day on the best barristers to effectively fight to keep the status quo on the position a Salvation Army Officer is not an employee. Therefore not protected under employee law and have no rights like an employee. Meaning they aggressively fought to be able to keep on treating officers anyway they like and keep using the fear method of behave or we will move or dismiss you as a weapon. $10,000 a day to keep this unjust system in play. They have no desire to serve suffering humanity and treat people with human dignity, not even their own, their officers or soldiers. They are in no position to change and they literally have no clue how to change. The movement William Booth started is dead and buried. 

The other problem is all those who have tried to change have left. All the amazing leaders left years ago. There are plenty of Salvationists who want change but the system simply won’t allow for it or create space for it. It’s all talk. It’s not going to change. 

The way forward is to take the example of Jesus, stay with the people of peace and pioneer a brand new movement wherever life happens. I have not looked back. It’s sad that people still have hope that The Army is going to change. It is current leadership right up to Lyndon who have enabled dysfunction and chosen to put the idols and dogma first and people last that have created the demise of this amazing organisation. 

But this is the way. This is what Jesus modelled. For his disciples to be thrust out into the mission field. So we can reach all cultures not just those who love an outdated 19th century irrelevant religious culture. 

This is the way. Death of the Army leads to resurrection of Jesus!

Additional comment from Peter.

I've been to youth forums, change conferences, and have been part of the change, pioneering brand-new Salvation Army communities for 40 years. Leaders talk and talk, then remain in an appointment for a year or two, then move on, and nothing happens. It’s spin to feed their narcissistic supply and make them look good so they can get promoted in the system. The talk always leads to nothing because the system is too inflexible to bring real reform.

My team worked with the territory to create a youth and children’s trauma-informed practice framework, working with our trained and proven family therapist from the Bellarine Community. Tens of thousands of dollars spent, then leaders change and the report is put on a shelf. The leaders that implemented the reform got disillusioned and left the army. Nothing happened with the report and over $80,000 wasted… It’s pure incompetence and blatant disregard of people and their investment in the mission. Our family therapist refused to work with the organisation after that. 

The idol of the soldier's covenant holds the army back, and they fight to keep it as it is. No leaders have the will to change or the knowledge of how to update it. When suggestions are made and implemented from officers on the ground, the senior leaders get their noses out of joint because the narcissistic supply is taken away from them. They then punish the leaders beneath them for thinking and innovating. It’s pathetic, it’s weak, and absolutely messed up. Narcissism is rife, nepotism is also rife, and there is zero accountability for senior leaders' decisions because they make decisions about officers in the secret, faceless Gestapo-style Officer Review board. Lives of officers are managed by people who don’t have good interpersonal people skills and, regretfully, are poor decision-makers, and what’s worst is they are usually their “friends” or peers. It’s just awful.

An Army of dysfunction, abuse, and self-obsession. It’s too toxic to change. I’d suggest any new cadet to get out while they can. But then there are no cadets anyway… senior leadership still doesn’t see there’s a problem… it’s embarrassing and an absolute disgrace to the name of Jesus. In fact, it’s Idolatry and taking the Lord's name in vain. I’m glad God is working to create brand-new organic expressions outside the army.

This is the way.

Thursday 15 February 2024

Part 239. Two key events.

The General Synod of the Church of England  meets at the end of February. The agenda includes an item on Safeguarding, a contentious issue as the current arrangements are not working. The Synod will be considering proposals for the next steps in the Living in Love and Faith saga. The talk is of 'reconciliation', but the proposals are a capitulation to the demands of Conservative Evangelicals and their Anglo-Catholic allies and another kick in the teeth for LBGTQ communities, unless they are rejected or significantly amended.

The first weekend in March sees The Salvation Army holding a conference entitled 'Belonging and Believing'. The results of an extensive survey of opinion within the United Kingdom & Ireland Territory will be published at the conference. A report from the conference will be presented to divisional and national leaderships for them to decide what to recommend to the top brass.  It is to be hoped the conference and report focus on how to stop and reverse the downward march in membership,  how to recruit many more officers and how to achieve full inclusion.




Wednesday 14 February 2024

Part 238. Towards full inclusion?

A senior officer at the territorial headquarters posted on a Facebook page that The Salvation Army in the United Kingdom & Ireland Territory is very much influenced by the charismatic and conservative evangelical wings of the Church of England.  Given the current shenanigans in the Church of England (and also in the Anglican Communion) on inclusion issues this does not bode well for any significant change in the stance of the Army on LBGTQ+ inclusion. 

However, some are of the opinion that the following statements may be indicative of change.  

Accountability and tranparency must be at the centre of our service and our leadership. In the world in which we live, and across the Army, the issues of culture and the way we do things must surrender to God’s way for his followers, especially those he has called to lead the Army and its people.
General Lyndon Buckingham.

The question that shouts out is: how do we define God's way? A theological minefield. The General is either signalling no change from the fundamentalist evangelical approach, or it is the precursor to a significant shift to a progressive stance. Either stance will be welcomed by some within the Army.

We both feel strongly about equality, which we hope is demonstrated by our leadership style. Equality, diversity and inclusion are very important to us both.This needs to be preached and lived out.
UK & I Territorial Leaders Jenine and Paul Main 

Is this an indication that fundamental change is afoot? One would like to think so, but I have my doubts. There may be tinkering at the edges. 

The Belonging and Believing conference in early March may test the waters as to the extent of demand for change.  A poor showing by the proponents of inclusion will be seized on by its opponents as a justification for no change. In my opinion that would be a disaster, not only for LBGTQ+ individuals, but also  for the Army's long-term survival in the UK.  

Edit.  

It has been suggested that the General's statement (a stand-alone  item on his Facebook page) concerns financial administration and management of resources being operated in a unified way across the Army. I agree it is a plausible interpretation. The statement ironically is opaque.


Monday 12 February 2024

Part 237. Campaigning: proposal to The Salvation Army

The Salvation Army's ability to campaign for social justice is limited by resource constraints. This is the case particularly in regard to campaigning below national level. Organisations responsible for social care, health, education, housing, transport do not have boundaries contiguous with corps areas. Thus campaigning for changes in the policies of a county council will need to involve a number of corps. Likewise with health trusts and housing associations. 

Given the resource limitations the Army has currently, I am proposing volunteer Social Justice Champions (or should it be social justice champions) form a virtual network to consider issues that arise which may impact on individuals in more than one corps area of influence.  To achieve this a number of matters require resolution.

* What is the status of SJCs? Are they appointed by Corps or are they simply a generic group of individuals with no specific/authorised status?

* What are the reporting and control mechanisms, both for individual SJCs and when acting collectively?

These are important points for both individuals and any network. When contacting organisations there is a need for both The Salvation Army and the organisation being contacted to understand SJCs are expressing views officially endorsed by the Army.

Clearly there is much more to be considered.


Friday 9 February 2024

Part 236. A deal in the offing?

The papers for the next meeting of the General Synod of the Church of England are published today. One paper is entitled:  

Living in Love, Faith, and Reconciliation 

Not, I hasten to add, my underlining. It is a 20 page document and I refrain from detailed analysis. The following points and observations stand out, well for me at least.

* There is an emphasis on the need for unity and respect for differing opinions. Mostly blather.

* Ten draft commitments are outlined. I was struck in particular by the 9th commitment relating to episcopay. Having learnt from the issue of women priests it is proposed that minimal formal structural change should be explored.

* The papers states approval of new services of blessing would have difficulty in achieving a two thirds majority in each of the three houses of Synod unless part of a settlement.

* The overall impression is that, in a bid to achieve a spurious unity at any cost, the interests of LBGTQ communities are to be sold down the river. The determining factor in negotiating a settlement will be the demands of conservative evangelicals and their conservative Anglo-Catholic collaborators.

* Discussion of same-sex marriage is off the agenda until at least after the 2025 General Synod elections.


Wednesday 7 February 2024

Part 235. Campaigning in Kent.

Kent is a big county with many centres of population. Local government is in the hands of Medway Council (unitary authority) and Kent County Council.  The KCC area is served also by 12 district councils.  KCC's area includes Dartford, Gravesend, Sheerness, Margate, Ramsgate, Dover, Folkestone, Ashford, Canterbury, Maidstone, Tunbridge Wells, Tonbridge and Sevenoaks. Sadly, the Salvation Army does not have a presence in all the major towns, nor in many smaller communities such as Edenbridge, Swanley, Paddock Wood and Tenterden.

A matter I have raised with TSA is how it responds to Kent County Council consultations.  How may a response be made to a consultation that includes  inputs from corps in the area? Does a process or mechanism exist to achieve this?  Should an online network be established to discuss social justice issues in the county? What is the role of Social Justice Champions? 

KCC is responsible for, inter alia, social care.  Social care affects all age groups: particularly individuals and families TSA comes in contact with and seeks to support.  KCC is currently consulting on its Adult Social Care Charging Policy. Will TSA express an opinion? We should be campaigning, writing to our KCC councillors and cabinet members, meeting them,  but we must do so with a united voice.

Tuesday 6 February 2024

Part 234. Progress, I hope.

Today, I received a copy of "the relaunched and restyled" Social Justice Newsletter published by The Salvation Army for Social Justice Champions. I await further developments. 

Part 233. Archbishops attempt to keep LLF on track.....they hope.

Forced move?  This situation should never have been permitted to arise. No news on a replacement co-lead. A poisoned chalice?


Theology Advisers | The Church of England
www.churchofengland.org
The Archbishops of Canterbury and York have announced the appointment of a new interim Theology Adviser, the Revd Canon Dr Jessica Martin, currently Canon Residentiary for Learning and Outreach at Ely Cathedral, to work alongside the Revd Dr Tom Woolford. Tom and Jessica will work as Joint Interim Theology Advisers to the House of Bishops and Secretaries to Faith and Order Commission (FAOC), on secondment for a six-month period starting in March 2024. These interim roles are in place while a substantive recruitment process is underway for a permanent successor to the Revd Dr Isabelle Hamley, who leaves the NCIs at the end of February to take up the role of Principal of Ridley Hall.

The Archbishops said: “In the last week, there has been a lot of public commentary about the appointment of the Interim Theology Adviser to the House of Bishops.

"This has required care to resolve, not just for individuals involved or affected by this appointment, but for the wider LLF process.

"We are grateful to Jessica and to Tom for their willingness to work together as interim Joint Theology Advisers.

"We remain concerned about the negative tone of debate in some parts of the Church, especially on social media.

"We must all do our utmost to disagree in a manner which shows the love of Jesus Christ to every person we encounter, especially those with whom we disagree.

"We are confident that Tom and Jessica will model this in their new roles and support the bishops in our work.”

Bishop Robert Innes, Chair of FAOC, said: “The Faith and Order Commission is an important resource for the national church representing a diversity of theological opinion and learning.

"I am confident that the Commission will be well served by our two new Interim Advisers. They are fine theologians, and I am personally looking forward very much to working with them.”

Dr Jessica Martin said: “It is a great pleasure to fulfil this interim role, working alongside Dr Woolford in the service of the whole Church, and modelling a mutual charity within difference in the advice he and I offer together to support the bishops and FAOC.”

Dr Tom Woolford said: “I understand the vital importance of ensuring that trust in the LLF process is maintained and I welcome the appointment of Dr Martin as Joint Theology Advisor.

"I intend and anticipate that we will both individually, as well as together, strive to provide advice in a neutral manner, and I look forward to our working together in support of the bishops and FAOC.”

Monday 5 February 2024

Part 232. Social Justice Champion, The Salvation Army

I have decided to have another try, following the shambles surrounding my previous attempt, at becoming a Salvation Army Social Justice Champion. I was invited to apply in a Salvation Army comment on one of my comments on their Facebook page. 


Friday 2 February 2024

Part 231. Love and Social Justice.

I do not engage in help to individuals and also campaign for social justice because I am a Christian.

I do not engage in help to individuals and also campaign for social justice because I follow Jesus.

I do these things because I choose to.

Part 230. Labour promises ban on conversion therapy.

An article in Pink News on welcome developments. Doubtless The Christian Institute will respond with its literalist fundamentalist Evangelical nonsense stoking fear about attacks on freedom.

'PinkNews | Latest lesbian, gay, bi and trans news | LGBTQ+ news
UK
Keir Starmer promises trans-inclusive conversion therapy ban under Labour
Jan 31
 Written by Chantelle Billson


LGBTQ+ activists have praised Keir Starmer for promising to bring in a trans-inclusive conversion therapy ban if Labour wins the next general election. ⁰

Labour leader Starmer vowed to tackle “psychologically damaging abuse” by bringing in a law that would extend the proposed safety net to transgender people. 


So-called conversion therapy refers to attempts by anti-LGBTQ+ groups or individuals to forcibly change the sexuality or gender identity of an individual, which is, of course, impossible.

According to The Express, Starmer, speaking to LGBT+ Labour on Tuesday (30 January), said: “We’ll implement a full, trans-inclusive, ban on all forms of conversion therapy.”


He added: “We fully support the view that conversion therapy is psychologically damaging abuse”.

LGBT Humanists co-ordinator Nick Baldwin responded to Starmer’s latest statement on conversion therapy by telling PinkNews: “I commend Keir Starmer for his promise to safeguard the rights and wellbeing of vulnerable LGBT people. Banning conversion therapy is not only a matter of legal necessity but also a moral imperative.

“It sends a clear message that the rights and dignity, and ultimate safety, of LGBT people should be protected in law.” 

A conversion therapy ban was first promised by Theresa May half a decade ago. 

Jayne Ozanne, the founder of the Ban Conversion Therapy Coalition, said she was glad to hear of the Labour leader’s pledge, which would “cover the one group that we know are most at risk: trans people.”

She continued: “Contrary to the fear-mongering that those wanting to continue these harmful practices are stoking, no parent, teacher or religious leader will ever be stopped from having challenging conversations with those in their care.

“What will be banned, however, are practices conducted by those with a pre-determined mind set, who say that someone can never be trans or gay. The ‘war on trans’ must stop. It is putting lives at risk for political gain, and will be viewed poorly by the electorate.”

Starmer has previously been criticised for taking Labour backwards on trans rights: Last year, he scrapped the party’s commitment to self-ID for trans people, whipped Labour MPs to abstain on the Tories’ unprecedented use of a Section 35 order to block the SNP’s gender reform bill, and described a woman as an ‘adult female’.

Keir Starmer and Labour Party banners
Keir Starmer is the current leader of the Labour Party. His comments on conversion therapy come just a day after one his most senior colleagues, shadow health secretary Wes Streeting, backed the idea of housing trans patients in separate hospital wards rather than ward that correspond with their gender identity.

In parliament on Monday (29 January), Starmer promised to crackdown on all categories of hate crime, with those found guilty facing longer jail sentences.

“We’ll strengthen the law, so every category of hate crime is treated as an aggravated offence,” he vowed.

Starmer went on to promise a modernisation of the Gender Recognition Act, following Scotland voting through its reform bill, allowing trans people to gain legal recognition without the need for a medical diagnosis.

Despite the party backtracking on previous commitments to self-ID, he insisted that Labour has defended LGBTQ+ rights. 

Last August, data journalist Ell Folan claimed that, under Starmer’s leadership, the Labour Party has become increasingly out of step with its voter base on the issue of transgender rights.'

Thursday 1 February 2024

Part 229. More Church of England discord

A storm has arisen over the appointment 'after an open and competitive process" of Revd. Dr Thomas Woolford  as interim Secretary to the Faith and Order Commission (FAOC)and Theological Adviser to the House of Bishops. The appointment was made by Bishop Robert Innes, Chair of FAOC. 

The appointment has been greeted with dismay and anger by progressives, so much so that one of the co-leaders of the LLF process, the Bishop of Newcastle has resigned. Her co-leader, the Bishop of Leicester, is staying on with provisos but has written to the two Archbishops seeking undertakings concerning his role, the appointment of a new co-leader  and appointment of a further adviser to ensure balance.

Bishop of Newcastle's Statement 

Living in Love and Faith: A Statement from Bishop Helen-Ann
First published on: 1st February 2024
My first commitment, and priority, is to continue to respond to God’s calling to be Bishop of Newcastle, and I rejoice in this calling. It has become clear to me in the last 48 hours that there are serious concerns relating to the recent process of appointing an Interim Theological Advisor to the House of Bishops. This was, and is not, an LLF appointment, and neither Bishop Martyn nor myself were involved in it. Whilst the remit of the theological advisor is broader than any matters relating to LLF, there is no doubt that LLF remains front and centre in the life of our Church at this time. What has transpired in the last 48 hours has had a critically negative impact on the work Bishop Martyn and I were seeking, in good faith, to do. My role as co-lead bishop for the LLF process is now undermining my capacity to fulfil my primary calling, to lead and care for the people and places of the Diocese of Newcastle.

I am fully committed to the vocation and life of the Church of England, its place in our diverse communities across this land, and in the wider Anglican Communion. Mindful of different views within my own diocese, I am also fully committed to the full inclusion of LGBTQIA+ people. I do not believe these are mutually exclusive, and I am not naïve in saying this. As I approach the 10th anniversary of my consecration as a bishop, my decision to step down from my LLF role is not one I have taken lightly, but is one built on all I have learnt about being a bishop, both here and in Aotearoa New Zealand. I will continue to be involved in the LLF process as a diocesan bishop, and will endeavour to prayerfully and actively work towards fulfilling the commitments expressed above, and those already agreed to in General Synod.

+Helen-Ann Newcastle,

February 1st 2024.

Strong stuff. The response of the Archbishops in on my Facebook page: John Hopkinson Theology Page 


Commentary

By Colin Coward, a leading light in Changing Attitude England

I checked my emails and Facebook before opening Thinking Anglicans, and only then discovered that Helen-Ann, the bishop of Newcastle, has stepped down from her LLF role because what has transpired in the last 48 hours had a critically negative impact on the work she and bishop Martyn were trying to do. I'm in a state of shock. 
What transpired to provoke her resignation seems to be the appointment of the Vicar of All Saints’, New Longton, the Revd Dr Thomas Woolford, a tutor at Emmanuel Theological College, as the interim secretary to the Faith and Order Commission (FAOC) and adviser to the House of Bishops. He has held homophobic and misogynistic views in the past, though he claims to have modified them.
The most recent post on TA reports that more than 130 members of the General Synod Sexuality and Gender Group have signed a letter expressing their view that the proposal of a “reset” of the Living in Love and Faith (LLF) process is unwise, and that talk of a “settlement” for those opposing the introduction of blessings for same sex couples fails to honour decisions taken by the Synod.


THINKING ANGLICANS 
Has the Bishop's Statement and then:

The Church Times has this: Bishop of Newcastle stands down from LLF over ‘serious concerns’ about interim adviser

This report is comprehensive, and I urge you to read it in full. But here are two excerpts:

…Earlier in the week, the Vicar of All Saints’, New Longton, the Revd Dr Thomas Woolford, a tutor at Emmanuel Theological College, was announced as the interim secretary to the Faith and Order Commission (FAOC) and adviser to the House of Bishops, before a permanent post-holder takes up the position in September.

After his appointment, an article by Dr Woolford, published in 2019 on the website of Church Society, a conservative Evangelical organisation in the C of E, began to be circulated on social media.

In the article, Mr Woolford wrote: “I think it would be disastrous and desperately wicked if the Church were to prepare blessings for things we must not bless, alter the canons to accommodate worldly thinking, give up the standard of chastity for ordained office-holders, or sanction false teaching.”

Speaking shortly after Dr Hartley’s announcement, Dr Woolford distanced himself from the tone of the article. “I’m still a conservative on blessings and on sexuality; so that part hasn’t changed,” he said. “But I’d put a lot of things differently in light of the journey that we’ve been on in Synod and in the wider Church.”

And the report later continues:

…On Thursday afternoon, the Bishop in Europe, Dr Robert Innes, who chairs the FAOC, said that Dr Woolford’s was an “advisory role, not an executive role”.

“He is an adviser among other advisers, and advisers come from an appropriately diverse array of positions,” he told the Church Times, and emphasised that it was a six-month interim appointment.

“It’s testament to the very febrile nature of the Church at the moment that the appointment of a temporary adviser attracts so much interest and controversy, and I do regret that.”

He described Dr Woolford as a “a very able theologian indeed”, who understood that he had to “behave in a neutral way”.

Statement from Bishop of Leicester.

Statement from Bishop Martyn on his role as Co-Lead Bishop for LLF.

I am deeply saddened by the Bishop of Newcastle’s decision to stand down from the role of Co-Lead Bishop for the Living in Love and Faith process. I greatly enjoyed working with her on this process and I want to express my personal thanks for her support and encouragement, and my respect for her decision to prioritise her ministry in her own diocese.

I took on the role of Co-Lead Bishop for the Living in Love and Faith process out of a sense of calling to bridge-building and reconciliation – both for their own sake and as a core part of our Christian witness. Having reflected on my position over the past couple of days, this sense of calling remains.

However, I recognise that confidence and trust in the Living in Love and Faith process is low, and that I cannot by myself rebuild that trust or command the confidence of the full breadth of the Church of England. So I have indicated to the Archbishops that I am willing to continue in the role of Co-Lead Bishop with several provisos: 

Like Bishop Helen-Ann, my diocese is my first priority. I have been in Leicester eight years and the people and communities of this wonderful diocese know my views on LLF. They may not all agree with my views but we have had regular discussions at Diocesan Synod, in small groups and one-to-one conversations, and there is a high level of mutual respect. I will continue to prioritise these local conversations.

The Archbishops will need to appoint a successor to Bishop Helen-Ann who commands similar respect across the House of Bishops and General Synod. It is important to model an approach of people with differing views working together.

The Secretary-General will need to appoint a second Interim Theological Adviser to the House of Bishops so that there is a similar model of working together across difference. And the Co-Lead Bishops for LLF must be involved in the appointment of future Theological Advisers (we were not involved in the recent process). 

The Faith and Order Commission must remain a diverse group which resources the House of Bishops through careful, rich and nuanced theological work.

I have asked the Archbishops to consider leading a time of prayerful reflection at General Synod which sets this whole process once again in the context of discernment about what sort of Church we are called to be in the coming years.

I remain committed to serving the Church as we seek a way forward which ensures that LGBTQIA+ people are accepted, valued and loved for who they are, and ensures that those who cannot in conscience use the Prayers of Love and Faith also have a secure place within the Church.

The commitments which will be brought to Synod later this month will do more to lay out the steps we need to take to improve the transparency and accountability of the Living in Love and Faith process. My prayers are for an honest, generous and prayerful debate.

Tuesday 30 January 2024

Part 228: A Miscellany.

A few quotations which may be on interest.

God is always on the side of the oppressed. To misunderstood this posture is to misunderstand all of Judeo-Christian history, theology and tradition 
Nazarenes United for Peace.

Compassion and justice are the primary ethical fruits of the Christian life.
Marcus Borg

Charity is necessary.  But Charity without justice is complicit in supporting systems that create the need for Charity.
Mark Sandlin

Kindness and justice are not synonymous. Be kind. And advocate and work for justice. Lives depend on it.
Bernice King

Let us not tire of preaching love.  It is the force that will overcome the world.
Oscar Romero 

Our language and theology are completely inadequate to name the eternal truth. The absolute best we can do is to claim that the Holy One can only be understood as love beyond all comprehension.
Caleb J Lines.

We walk into the mystery of God; we do not define that Mystery.
John Shelby Spong

A church which doesn't provoke any crisis, a gospel which doesn't unsettle, a word of God that doesn't get under anyone's skin, a word of God that doesn't touch the real sin of the society in which it is proclaimed - what gospel is that?
Oscar Romero 

If I sit next to a madman as he drives a car into a group of innocent bystanders, I can't as a Christian,simply wait for the catastrophe, then comfort the wounded and bury the dead. I must try and wrestle the steering wheel out of the hands of the driver.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer 

If it's not about love, then it's not about God. 
Michael Curry 


Monday 29 January 2024

Part 227: Living in Love and Faith update

The latest position on the Love and Living in Faith journey looks like this (I think).  The talk now is not of 'structured differentiation' but of the Conservative Evangelicals preferred word 'settlement'.  The intention of those leading the development of a settlement is to present to the February meeting of General Synod a paper outlining proposed 'commitments' intended to form the basis for an initial settlement document to be put to the Synod in July. The final settlement proposals will be presented at the February 2025 meeting.  All this presupposes smooth progress, not be regarded as a given. To the chagrin of many the commitments look likely to be a bid for plurality holding equal status for the liberals and conservatives.  

Meanwhile no progress is being made on implementing the decision of General Synod to permit stand alone services of blessing for individuals in same-sex civil marriages.  It is understood the House of Bishops had a majority for a trial period for such services but the two Archbishops in effect vetoed such a move.

It is to be hoped that when the eventual settlement proposal comes before General Synod its approval in contingent on Synod approving by a two-thirds majority the use of stand alone services.

The overall impression one has is of the Archbishop of Canterbury striving at any cost  to maintain the unity of the Anglican Communion and at the same time attempting to prevent the breakup of the Church of England. Sadly the pain and anguish of gay individuals is collateral damage. It is a disgrace.


Sunday 28 January 2024

Part 226. Conservative Evangelicals' mindset

Conservative Evangelicals in the Church of England claim marriage is between one man and one woman on the basis that it is the traditional expression of marriage in scripture. Accordingly no other form of marriage has claim to biblical authority. Such interpretation is rooted in literalism and claims to bible inerrancy. Fortunately secular society sees things differently, as do some Christian church denominations.

Opposition to change within the CofE comes from conservative Anglo-Catholics and, far more significantly, conservative Evangelicals.  This blog has commented at length on the ongoing battle within the CofE.

The Salvation Army holds an identical theological view to the CofE and the Roman Catholic Church: marriage is between one man and one woman. Whilst there are individuals within TSA campaigning for full inclusion (sexual orientation should not be used to justify discrimination) there is little sign that the Army will move away from its current stance. One senior officer at the United Kingdom & Ireland Territory Headquarters has stated that the Army is heavily influenced by the charismatic and evangelical wings of the CofE.  Not a good omen.

So, will change come? Will the conference at Warwick University this March on what it means to belong in the Army be the catalyst producing change in TSA's approach? Maybe, but don't count on it.

Saturday 27 January 2024

Part 225. Love and Justice

A thread running through the Old and New Testaments is the demand for justice for the widow, the orphan, the poor, the downtrodden, the despised, the marginalised. Jesus demands his followers love their neighbour, but we are also called to demand justice, particularly for the poor.

'Love' and 'justice' are both subjective concepts.  How should they be defined and applied? How long is a piece of string? Is there an all-embracing definition for either word? Doubtful. What amounts to love or justice is dependent upon the circumstances in which either is applied. Context is all.

Love relates to individuals, either singularly or collectively. Thus individuals donating food to foodbanks will show love to one or more people unknown to them. Love manifests itself in numerous ways as illustrated by Paul's letters.  Jesus illustrates love in many ways as enumerated throughout the synoptic gospels.

The pursuit of justice is directed to systemic change, to achieving better futures for victims or potential victims of injustice. The objective may be clear but there are major issues to consider. What change is required to achieve the desired outcome? How will it be achieved?  There will often be disagreement on what needs to be done and how, driven by political, social, faith and economic perspectives.  Identifying injustice is the easier stage, although there may be disagreement as to its extent. How to overcome it is the hardest stage as competing solutions are offered. It is incumbent on faith organisations to recognise the need for compromise if any progress to achieving justice is to be made. 

Karl Popper observed that it is vital to work for concrete solutions rather than stand back awaiting some future hope or ideal. Put it another way. Followers of Jesus wish to work for God's kingdom on earth in the here and now, not wait for a second Advent. 

Friday 26 January 2024

Part 224. LLF. Next steps.

The Bishops of Newcastle and Leicester are quoted in The Church Times as stating it is their hope agreement on structural change, to accommodate clergy and parishes opposed to prayers for couples in a same-sex marriage, will be approved by General Synod before the next round of Synod elections. Achieving this will stop the issue dominating the elections, they hope.  However same-sex marriage by the Church of England may well become a major issue.

It is reported that the two Bishops are planning to have the issue of structural change on the next General Synod agenda. Likely to be about process rather than substantive proposals.

How will Synod members in favour of the new prayers respond to proposals for structural change? In my opinion any change to accommodate conservative Evangelicals and conservative Anglo-Catholics should be resisted. Call their bluff and should they choose to leave, so be it.


Thursday 25 January 2024

Part 223. Church of England: shocking developments

News is filtering out that the senior leadership of the Church of England (the Archbishops) has decided not to proceed for now with the introduction of stand-alone services of blessing for individuals in same-sex marriages, nor to the introduction of new pastoral guidance permitting same-sex clergy to marry and not be celibate. The new guidance would supercede Issues of Human Sexuality.

Instead of implementing the wishes of General Synod priority will be given to securing a settlement with those opposed to change. So, no change until there is a structural differentiation and 'protection' for those opposed to change.  Shades of the women priests brouhaha.

The register to list churches willing to perform the proposed services will not be implemented until a new structure has been determined.

It is a disgrace. The clear decisions of Synod have been kicked into the long grass by the decision of the Archbishops to succumb to the threats of those opposed to change. Potentially years of wrangling lay ahead. General Synods could be a battleground for years. 

Perhaps Parliament should intervene. After all, the Church of England is the established church subject to Parliament.

Wednesday 24 January 2024

Part 222. Poverty: a stain on the nation.

Yesterday, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation published a further report on poverty in the United Kingdom: UK Poverty 2024. The essential guide to understanding poverty in the UK.  It is another truly shocking report and further clear evidence of the need for the campaign by the churches to demand government takes urgent action.

It is shameful  that poverty levels are so high. The report is easy to find on a search engine and I have downloaded the Foundation's news article, which contains a download link to the report, to my Facebook page: John Hopkinson Theology Page.  It is a long detailed report and well worth close study.

*Please take a look at the Let's End Poverty website: letsendpoverty.co.uk. it is brimful with campaigning ideas and action. Better still,  join the campaign.






Part 221. The call of Jesus.

Jesus had and continues to have a profound effect on the thinking and actions of humanity. For many, their lives are dedicated to following his teaching and praxis. 

Love your neighbour and seek his kingdom on earth.  It all sounds so simple, deceptively so.  To follow Jesus inevitably leads to clashes with the forces of power and wealth. In his time Jesus was deeply involved in disputation with religious, legal  and political authority. He championed the poor, the marginalised, the discriminated against. He railed against injustice. 

Jesus called for transformation in individuals' attitudes and through this for a new society. This is for the followers of Jesus to seek today.  It is all that matters. Ignore the Old Testament as Jesus is its fulfilment. Pauline theology is commentary and personal opinion, it is not essential reading to understanding and applying the teaching of Jesus. 

My interest is in life on earth, not life after death. I despair of religion concentrating  on regarding individuals as fallen and in need of salvation with the gift of eternal life as a reward. We are not donkeys subject to the stick and carrot approach as to how we conduct our lives. Jesus teaches us not to be selfish and self-centred but to go out into the world and preach and work to achieve his message of love and justice, for his kingdom to come on earth as it is heaven, 

Jesus tells us to love God. But what or who is God? A metaphysical entity or a concept of human imagination? Humanity strives to understand what is beyond understanding. A mystery but not a superstition.  Faith is hope and being certain of what is unseen and unknown.  Refuse to anthropomorphise God but freely acknowledge the power of prayer to grant us assurance and hope.

Part 220. Following Jesus

We can love God as a concept, as an ideal  beyond human understanding. The authors of the Bible attempted to understand God,  just as we do today.  God in beyond our comprehension; the evangelical mantra  that the Bible is God inspired is a myth. On what basis is the claim made that an individual's writing is inspired by God rather than the author's attributing his thoughts as God inspired? It follows that we should not read the Bible in a literalist, fundamentalist way: the premis that the Bible is God's "truth" is nonsense on stilts. However  we should not be entirely dismissive. The Old Testament provides an invaluable record  of some of humanity's thinking and how it was applied in the life and society of the time.

Well, that puts me beyond the pail of evangelical doctrine. It debars me from becoming a Salvation Army soldier, but given the Army's current homophobic stance on soldiership based on a woeful interpretation of the Bible, it is highly unlikely I would seek to be one.

The importance of our reading the Bible is to secure an understanding of the teaching of Jesus and its application, not through literal interpretation, but through our understanding of the principles enunciated and actions recorded.  Postmodernism holds that the meaning of a text is discerned by the reader, which may differ from the intention of the author.  Thus the principles of Jesus should be understood and applied in a current context. Such an approach makes the teaching of Jesus relevant today: to love all our neighbours, to seek transformation,  justice and systemic change for the poor, excluded, marginalised and discriminated against.






Part 219. Thy kingdom come on earth

A key feature of progressive christianity, the following is a collection of theological insights, concerning God's Kingdom on earth

"The Kingdom of God" was not about an afterlife, about how to get into heaven, but about the transformation of life one earth.
Marcus J Borg 

The Kingdom of God is not a matter of getting individuals into heaven, but of transforming the life on earth into the harmony of heaven.
Walter Rauschenbusch

Many progressive Christians aren't particularly concerned about going to heaven after they die.  In fact, many are openly agnostic about whether or not there is a heaven.  Our concern is more upon living and loving  in God's Kingdom right now, and faithfully helping to manifest it all the more.
Roger Wolsey, Kissing Fish Book

Part 218. Cats and kids.

When we moved house the first thing our cat did on release was go AWOL. Months later as we were walking through the site of the old colliery tip our cat appeared. We picked her up, took her home, fed her and showed her her old bed. However, a little while later she disappeared. Next morning we opened the door and there she was with four kittens. We were delighted and she was content to stay with us.

Some children run away from home. It is often the case they are found quickly. Some are found and returned home or return home on their own volition. Parent(s) and other family members are overjoyed at the safe return of a child, the running away is forgiven.

One may imagine the joy attributed to the father in the Parable of the Prodigal Son on the return of his wayward son. The joy of reunion with a loved one outshone every other consideration. Jesus tells of unconditional, transformational love for all. A key message sadly lost on bible loving literalist fundamentalists and churches that are not fully inclusive.

Tuesday 23 January 2024

Part 217. The Prodigal Son

The Parable of the Prodigal Son (Luke 15:11-32) is an illustration of the central  message of Jesus: unconditional love. 

Love is for all regardless of class, colour, sexual orientation, wealth or any other forms of separation humanity is capable of making.  As one reads the story of the son who wasted his inheritance and returned to be feted by his father one cannot but have some empathy with the attitude of the son that stayed with the father and did his bidding. A major attack of envy that the wayward son should receive such a welcome, almost a reward for returning, instead of being castigated for his behaviour. But that is not God's way. Love in indiscriminate, available to all equally.

We may think it unfair, that the profligate behaviour of one son seems to be disregarded, indeed rewarded, but in God's economy love conquers all.

Sadly some churches embrace division and exclusion in their theology and praxis. It is wrong and counter to the command to love others as one would wish to be loved, particularly if you were in their shoes.




Friday 19 January 2024

Part 216. Imprisonment or freedom?

Most of us have spent our lives building a theological mansion that only turned out to be a theological prison.
Justin Phillips. Church Pastor, USA 

This reminds me of a verse from a Charles Wesley hymn:

    Long my imprisoned spirit lay
fast bound in sin and nature's night;
   Thine eye diffused a quickening ray-
I woke  the dungeon flamed with light;
    my chains fell off, my heart was free.
I  rose, went forth, and followed thee.

By what may a person be imprisoned?   It may be by a Church's approach to biblical interpretation, by church tradition, by church dogma, rules or regulations. All may impinge on  understanding and application of our faith. 

An individual may be imprisoned by peer group pressure, by a desire to conform, by fear of isolation or rejection. Whatever the cause, passing through the cell door to freedom involves reevaluation and probably rejection of what has gone before.

For some the escape is a gradual process, for others sparked by a trigger event or experience. Over time I formed the opinion that the central driver of Christian faith is not church tradition, nor literal interpretation of scripture.  The driver is the centrality of Jesus and his command to love without limitations or conditions. We should understand this love through the lens of our experience and understanding of the world as it is, not as it was when the Scriptures were composed. Our understanding of God's love is ongoing, it did not end in the first century of the Common Era.  Sadly the early Christianity succeeded in separating the church from the teaching of Jesus by taking its lead from Pauline ideas and developing dogma far removed from the teaching of Jesus. 

The teaching of Jesus is to be discerned in the synoptic gospels. We do not need to consider the rest of the canon as anything other than of secondary importance. Also, we need to be aware that the synoptic gospels should be read to understand the ideas they convey, not by literal word by word forensic analysis. The authors of the synoptic gospels each had their own subjective opinions to advance in their selection and interpretation of oral tradition and existing documentation.  

This understanding of the central teaching of Jesus, the command to love all unconditionally, was my trigger moment  freeing me from the chains of fundamentalist bible-based faith and releasing me to proclaim God's love for all creation. Now I am free to follow Jesus,




Thursday 18 January 2024

Part 215: The Good Samaritan

An interesting statement by Martin Luther King Jnr on the parable of the Good Samaritan. 

"The first question which the priest and Levite asked was: If I stop to help this man what will happen to me?

But the good Samaritan reversed the question: if I do not stop to help this man, what will happen to him?

This tension between the demands of organised religion and the duty to love is well illustrated by Richard Rohr:  

His (Jesus) hardest words of judgment were for those who perpetuated systems of inequality and repression and who, through religion itself, thought they were sinless and untouchable.


In the following quotation King gives expression to the expansion of the concept of love from direct help to a demand for systemic change.

"True compassion is more than flinging a coin at a beggar. It comes to see that an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring.


Wednesday 17 January 2024

Part 214. Galbraith, King and Popper.

In The Affluent Society (1958) Kenneth William Galbraith describes an 'underclass' consisting of people in low paid dead-end jobs who nevertheless provide vital services: rubbish collectors, packers, janitors, drain cleaners, shop staff etc. Individuals in well paid employment with comfortable working environments and career progression relied on the work and low pay of the underclass in order to maintain their own comfortable lifestyle. Politically it was hard to sell to the better off the idea that they should pay more tax to lift people out of low wages and also tackle the systemic issues of poor eduction, poor housing, poor health, poor public transport etc. Galbraith observed that the state had the means but lacked the political will to act. Or rather, selfish self interest in the electorate beats altruism.

However the reaction in the USA was not all negative. indeed during the Kennedy and Johnson administrations federal funding was made available to improve living conditions for the poor in society. Information on this is available through a search-engine. The fact is that, partly through the prompting of Galbraith, issues surrounding the causes of poverty did become major political issues and were acted upon.

Martin Luther King Jnr is remembered particularly for his non-violent campaigning and demonstrating for racial equality. This aspect of his work has tended to push into the background his call for radical redistribution of wealth and systemic change in society to tackle poverty, marginalisation and discrimination.  Three examples:

We must recognise that we can't solve our problems now until there is a radical redistribution of economic and political power.....this means a revolution of values and other things. We must see now that the evils of racism, economic exploitation and militarism are all tied together....you can't really get rid of one without getting rid of others....the whole structure of American life must change. 

I am now convinced that the simplest approach will prove the most effective. The solution to poverty is to abolish it directly by a now widely discussed matter: the guaranteed income.  The time has come for us to civilise ourselves by the total, direct and immediate abolition of poverty.

I am sure that none of you would want to rest content with the superficial kind of social analysis that deals merely with effects and does not grapple with underlying causes.

See Part 211 for comment on Karl Popper.

The thread running through the above is the need for political action now to tackle the systemic causes of poverty.  The task  for churches in the UK is to campaign vigorously so that the message is heard in social media and political circles, but most importantly is acted upon by the politicians. A start has been made: there is a mountain to climb.

Tuesday 16 January 2024

Part 213. On the march (and about time).

The Church is not the master or the servant of the state, but rather the conscience of the state.  It must be the guide and critic of the state, and never its tool.
Martin Luther King Jnr 

The Christian in the modern world must be politically involved, at least to the extent of being concerned about political issues as they impinge on human freedom, justice, equality, economic and social development, and above all, on the condition of the poor.
Fr John F Carroll, SJ  

Last year I posted on two damning reports on Poverty and Destitution in the UK. (See posts 173 & 187)

Destitution in the UK 2023. 
Published by Joseph Rowntree Foundation

Two Nations: the State of Poverty in the UK.
Published by the Centre for Social Justice 

I doubted if the churches would enter the political fray and campaign for systemic change. I am delighted to note that senior leaders of churches and Christian charities have come together to publish the statement below.  The sentiment is excellent. We await details of the programmes of 'practical action and....
courageous campaigning'.


The Statement (See also post 210)

We believe that poverty is a scandal, the root causes of which have been neglected by our political leaders in the UK Parliament for too long. As this new year begins, the cost of living scandal is clearly not over for the poorest people in the UK. Around the world, poverty holds too many individuals and communities back from fulfilling their potential.

But we know that poverty is not inevitable – it’s a consequence of political choices and priorities. With a General Election on the horizon, we call on our political leaders to make tackling poverty a priority. In line with our existing commitment to the UN Sustainable Development Goals, this should include setting out clear plans to eradicate extreme poverty and reduce overall poverty by at least half, in both the UK and globally by 2030. 

Whilst our work to tackle poverty in the UK and around the world takes different forms, we are united in our belief that the human cost of failing to take action now is too big and too damaging to ignore. This year must mark the beginning of the end for poverty. 

Inspired by our faith, we believe in a future where everyone has an equal share in the world’s resources. Where everyone has enough to eat. Where all of us are able to wake up in the morning with hope, opportunities and options for living a fulfilling life. 

This year, our Churches and Christian charities are committed to putting poverty on the agenda through practical action, prophetic words and courageous campaigning. Our elected politicians need to take responsibility too.  Now is the time for action.