Part 293. Let’s be pragmatic. (1)

I have believed for many years that the resolution of issues is best achieved by taking a pragmatic approach unfettered by assumptions and opinions entrenched in dogma associated with a specific philosophy.  That is not to state that there is no need for guiding principles but principles exist for just that purpose, to guide, not to act as a total fetter or constraint on reaching resolution of issues.

An example.  The National Health Service in England is in very poor shape and no matter how much money is spent on it matters do not improve.  Finding solutions to the various problems is not helped by a dogmatic assertion of the need for privatisation or retention of public ownership.  What is required is finding the most appropriate solution unfettered by political considerations underpinned by political philosophies. An individual on a long waiting list for treatment couldn't care less how the waiting period is reduced and even less about arguments over private or public ownership.  

Dogma and bigotry borne of adhering slavishly to a philosophy have been the cause of much misery.

I recognise the above is a generalisation. Nevertheless I believe we do need to consider the relationship between applying principles and being pragmatic. Rather than one very long post the argument will be spread over a number of posts.