Planning Shambles (6)

Most of the new wall has been demolished and re-building on a new line is in progress.  A change demanded by Kent County Council has resulted in an improved sight line.  You will recall from an earlier post that Tunbridge Wells Borough Council was mindful to do nothing. This will form the basis of a formal complaint.

The re-built wall does not accord with the approved plans.  The difference is not major and although the outcome is not ideal I suspect KCC will apply the de minimis rule.

Opposition parties in Tunbridge Wells

The disaster that is overwhelming the retail sector in town and city centres has been accentuated by the COVID crisis.  However the problems existed well before the virus struck.  There is a desperate need for something to attract people into Tunbridge Wells, apart from the mayhem of boozers.  One idea was to develop the town as a cultural centre and a major proposal was for a new theatre to replace and improve on the Assembly Hall which is slowly falling apart.

An unholy alliance of opposition parties,  some members of the controlling party and a rat-bag of assorted local loud-mouths and foghorns killed the theatre scheme and with  it any future the town may have had.

Now these self-same councillors are seeking to replace the leader of the council for failing to be dynamic in dealing with the consequences of the virus.

Planning Shambles (5)

At last!  The offending wall is being demolished.  Tunbridge Wells Borough Council stated the wall was 'broadly' in accordance with the plans and decided to do nothing.  Fortunately Kent County Council  was not of the same opinion.

Planning Shambles (4) An end in sight?

Today there was a site meeting between the developer. Kent County Council Highways and Tunbridge Wells Borough Council  planners to consider the issue of 'the wall' (See earlier posts)

The outcome. conveyed to me by TWBC

Part of the wall is to be rebuilt where that part obscures the vision splays agreed in the planning permission.

Not before time!

Letter in today's Daily Telegraph:

SIR – Lists of user-friendly bars (Letters, July 1) will always lead with Maurice’s Peacock Inn in Nottingham, during the swinging Seventies.

Bells on the wall would bring pints of Shipstone’s in a jiffy, delivered with banter from another era.

I knew the pub well.  It was located on Mansfield Road, just up from the site of Nottingham Victoria station and opposite York House where I worked.  Many a happy lunchtime and after work sessions.  The lounge bar had a bell system.  Activate the bell push and Maurice would appear, tea-towel over his shoulder, take your order and reappear with tray and drinks and non PC banter.  Happy days.

Planning: Shambles ((3) Red :Lion Wall

The saga continues.  Recently I published the e-mails I sent and received on this matter.

https://kentcommunityactivist.blogspot.com/2020/06/planning-application-2-shambles.html

On 08 June Tunbridge Wells Borough Council (TWBC)  e-mailed me:

I have visited the site, and spoken to the developer. The wall being rebuilt broadly fits the detail of the plan 05D on 19/03589/LBC. As the development has always been controversial in terms of the visibility splays of access to the site, I believe they have adjusted it slightly for better visibility. As such I do not see this as a substantial breach of the plans.

In other words TWBC is happy to do nothing.

A few days later Kent County Council Highways (KCC) visited the site and contacted TWBC.  the upshot was this e-mail from TWBC dated 19 June.

I have since had a chance to hear from KCC Highways and they agree the wall, as built, is built on the wrong line in part.

The developer accepts this is an error of their making, and will be realigning it to comply with the visibility splays.

Rather a change!

However the developer has not realigned the wall. Instead he has continued building it. Time for me to complain again:

I e-mailed KCC on 01 July and received this response on 02 July.

At this stage I can advise you that  the developer is aware of this matter and  that the wall is under further consideration by both the highway and planning authorities.

Another change of stance.  What a shambles.  I fired off this response to KCC.

Thus 'further consideration' means let the developer continue to built and then?  Oh dear the work is so far advanced we should not stop it.  The developer should have been stopped.

I'll keep you posted.  My opinion is that the developer will get away with it. I shall be making a complaint to TWBC and KCC  in any event about how this matter has been handled.